SAN FRANCISCO, 7:34 AM, WED JUL 9 | 29 POSTS IN THE LAST 24 HOURS | tips@io9.com | RSS

Martian Ice Ages Bolster Case for Life on Red Planet

Just ten million years ago (a geological eyeblink), Mars could've had an ice age. Even cooler, it may have been one of several, meaning the planet underwent freeze/thaw periods much like those here on Earth. And that means — you guessed it — the chances for liquid water and life on the Red Planet just went way up. Cooler still, those glaciers likely had liquid water near their base, and seeping into the rocks below. A new study in the journal Geology based on images from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter has found compelling evidence that sheets of ice between 1 and 2.5 kilometers thick grew near the Martian equator some time in the recent past.

Even if Mars has had steadily sub-freezing weather for a long time now, glaciers can provide the kind of cover needed to maintain liquid water. We know from Earthling ice sheets that as you go deeper inside them, the temperature tends to go up. Down near the bottom the crushing pressure of miles of ice piled on top can cause melting. Ponds and lakes can even form.

The researchers — headed by Jay Dickson of Brown University — think the same thing could've happened on Mars:

After examining stunning high-resolution images taken last year by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, the researchers have documented for the first time that ice packs at least 1 kilometer (0.6 miles) thick and perhaps 2.5 kilometers (1.6 miles) thick existed along Mars' mid-latitude belt as recently as 100 million years ago. In addition, the team believes other images tell them that glaciers flowed in localized areas in the last 10 to 100 million years - akin to the day before yesterday in Mars' geological timeline.

This evidence of recent activity means the Martian climate may change again and could bolster speculation about whether the Red Planet can, or did, support life.

"We've gone from seeing Mars as a dead planet for three-plus billion years to one that has been alive in recent times," said Jay Dickson, a research analyst in the Department of Geological Sciences at Brown and lead author of the Geology paper. "[The finding] has changed our perspective from a planet that has been dry and dead to one that is icy and active."

Images from Mars orbiter.
Source: Geology via Science Blog

9:45 AM on Fri Apr 25 2008
By Michael Reilly
810 views
9 comments

Comments

  • [from] "dry and dead to one that is icy and active."
    Sounds like my dating history.
    Heeeyyy Ooooooh!

    Okay, seriously now.

    This makes me think of that recent "Going green is about saving humans not the earth" post.

    Why isn't it possible that the Earth's atmosphere could get so f'ed up that it ends up like Mars? Maybe it would even get there without us. Maybe there was once a Martian "Green" movement (maybe that's even where the phrase Little Green Men came from!) And folks were like "No. We could never destroy Mars. It's had water and ice for billions of years!" That will never end."

    Okay, maybe not. But still. (Or not? I don't know. Just thinking outloud.)

  • Are we talkin' water ice, or carbon dioxide ice? Because I don't think you'd get much life with the latter. And if it was water ice, where'd it all go and can it ever come back?

  • Thanks, now I know for sure where I'll land!

  • Image of amorphous amorphous at 10:54 AM on 04/25/08 *

    Maybe when we land there we will find a Martian Ötzi...

    I will avenge your death, my friend.

  • Isn't J'onn J'onzz proof enough for life on Mars?

  • Killer bacteria FTW!

  • Man. That first photo looks like a cross-section from a reproductive poster.
    Planetary Vagina.
    Yeah. It's Friday...

  • So if there is life on Mars, do you think it will ever be terraformed? Or will environmentalist sue the pants off anyone trying to change the atmosphere to support human life?

  • @Sihanouk-s-Poodle: I wish this would be a real question in our lifetimes but I doubt it. I would say yes, though, that any attempt to use any of the planets or moons for the benefit of mankind will be met with stiff opposition from the same types who oppose doing anything on earth for the benefit of mankind. Anything practical, I should say, like drilling our own oil, that sort of thing.

Start a discussion:

Reply by Email

Login with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.