io9

  • io9
  • science
  • overmind
  • kotaku
  • gizmodo
Profile logout login
Futurama reveals a love story that spans the entire history of the universe...twice

Futurama reveals a love story that spans the entire history of the universe...twice #futuramarecap #futurama

Check out some gorgeous Sucker Punch art, and learn why Zack Snyder's going fantasy

Check out some gorgeous Sucker Punch art, and learn why Zack Snyder's going fantasy #exclusive #suckerpunch

Ask China Miéville anything you want about "The City & The City"

Ask China Miéville anything you want about "The City & The City" #io9bookclub #chinamieville

Everything we know about what's coming next on Supernatural

Everything we know about what's coming next on Supernatural #thisisawesome #supernatural

The dystopian novel that's turning China upside down

The dystopian novel that's turning China upside down #futuredystopias #books

Spectroscopy: Using rainbows to analyze the universe

Spectroscopy: Using rainbows to analyze the universe #madscience #physics

Grant Morrison drops hints about his new Western indie flick, Sinatoro

Grant Morrison drops hints about his new Western indie flick, Sinatoro #exclusive #grantmorrison

io9

FAQ. Include # before tag:
#observationdeck, #tips, #calendar, #corrections, etc.

San Francisco, 11:52 AM
Fri Jul 30
26 posts in the last 24 hours


Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
sending request

IO9 TEAM

Tip your editors:

Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |

Managing Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |

Senior Reporter:
Meredith Woerner |

Assistant Editor:
Cyriaque Lamar |

Contributing Editor:
Marc Bernardin |

Graphic Design:
Stephanie Fox |

Contributors:
Tim Barribeau |
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |
Dr. Dave Goldberg |
Josh Wimmer
Chris Braak

Interns:
David Daw |
Mary Ratliff |
Kelly Faircloth

Media Requests:


Follow io9 on:
Twitter
Facebook
io9 Brings You Complete San Diego
Comic-Con Coverage.

SUBSCRIBE TO IO9 RSS



Welcome to io9

  • Sign up for the io9 Daily and get one great story in your inbox each day.


    Please enter your email address.
    Please enter a valid email address.
    sending request

  • Join io9 on Facebook. Click "Like" to get the most important stories in your News Feed.

Please confirm your birth date:

Please enter a valid date
Please enter your full birth year
This content is restricted.

Mathematician Uses SETI Formula To Determine He Has A 0.00034% Chance Of Getting Laid

An economics graduate student in the UK has used the well-known Drake Equation - used to figure out how many advanced civilizations might reside in our galaxy - to determine why he hasn't had a girlfriend in three years.

The Drake Equation was created by astronomer Frank Drake at the first SETI conference in the 1960s, and was used to determine how many civilizations in our galaxy might be capable of communicating with ours.

Here is the typical Drake Equation:

N = R* • fp • ne • fl • fi • fc • L

According to the SETI institute, these are the original parameters:

N = The number of civilizations in The Milky Way Galaxy whose electromagnetic emissions are detectable.

R* =The rate of formation of stars suitable for the development of intelligent life.

fp = The fraction of those stars with planetary systems.

ne = The number of planets, per solar system, with an environment suitable for life.

fl = The fraction of suitable planets on which life actually appears.

fi = The fraction of life bearing planets on which intelligent life emerges.

fc = The fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space.

L = The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals into space.

To investigate his girlfriend problem, researcher Peter Backus wrote a brief paper in which he modified the parameters of the Drake Equation to discover the number of women in the UK who could be his girlfriend. He changed the N to G, for possible girlfriends. Here are the other modifications he made:

R is the rate of formation of people in the UK

fw is the percentage who are women

fl is the fraction of women who live in London

fA is the fraction who are age-appropriate [by this he means up to 7 years younger than himself, but no more than 3 years older]

fu is the fraction of age-appropriate women in London with university degrees

fb is the fraction of these age-appropriate university women in London who he finds attractive [he claims 1 in 20]

L is length of time he's been alive [31 years]

So basically you multiply the values he provides for each of these parameters (read the paper [PDF] for details), and you get his tragic chance of getting a girlfriend: There are only 26 women in the UK he could actually date.

Before you get all weepy for this guy, let's consider his methodology when it comes to his vain attempts to get laid, shall we?

Backus has modeled his search for a human being on a planet coated with human beings by using an equation designed to locate communicative civilizations in the vast reaches of our galaxy. What does that mean? He's assuming that "women I can have sex with" and "communicative aliens" are roughly comparable values. If you consider the rest of the Drake Equation, that would make most women into the equivalent of dead planets, empty space, and alien life without intelligence. A tiny percentage of those women might not be dead or empty. An even tinier percentage could communicate intelligently, but possibly not during his lifetime.

This aspiring economics researcher has made one of the most basic mistakes men make - especially men who are science fiction writers or scientists. He's confused women with extraterrestrials. And he has drawn a comparison between the cultural attributes of those women and the evolutionary development of ecosystems on other worlds.

I think we know why Backus is having a hard time getting laid. He's treating women as if they aren't human. Maybe if he'd remember that we're part of his species, he'd be spending more time putting that pretty face of his to good use, instead of writing papers about why he isn't.

via Peter Backus' website

Send an email to Annalee Newitz, the author of this post, at annalee@io9.com.


Upload an image | Add an image URL ×
×
×
Choose a file to upload:
×
Attribute comment to:
Please enter an email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
Dsmvwl | Admin | Promote only | Promote to frontpage | Approve user | Ban user  ×
Loading comments ... -/|\
Earlier discussions Paging in progress... | Other discussions | Show all discussions | Show featured discussions only | Expand all replies Collapse all replies
Start a new discussion
By Annalee Newitz
share on facebook
Jan 26, 2010 03:32 PM 24,053 views on this post, 4,178 new visitors24,053 185
Edit » Set to Draft » Invite » Syndicate » Edit timestamp »

Syndicate this post


Site:
Mode:

sending request
cancel
more about #aliens
V's Logan Huffman explains why his character is such a jerk
Lost’s Damon Lindelof hired to rewrite Ridley Scott's Alien prequel
Tribble machines, zombie solidarity bands and face-huggers: Comic-Con Radvertising!
read more: #madscience, #aliens, #drakeequation, #seti, #peterbackus, #mathematics, #whatthehellsciencedouche, #jezebel, #tweet
 
  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Register

One last thing!

While we don't require an email address to sign up, consider adding one to your account. This will give you the ability to reset a lost or stolen password.

Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need a login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

Your username will be the part of your email address before the @ sign. If you wish to remain anonymous, create your own username by signing up for a Gawker account here.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Already Have an Account?
Login with your Facebook or existing io9 account.

Questions?
Learn more at the Comment FAQ.



Invite a friend to comment

To invite people to this discussion, send them an email invitation by pasting in a list of comma-separated email addresses and then clicking Send invites.

Please enter at least one email address.
Please use valid email addresses.
Please use unique email addresses.
Please enter fewer addresses.
requesting invites

Send a link

Send a link to this post 'Mathematician Uses SETI Formula To Determine He Has A 0.00034% Chance Of Getting Laid' via email:

Please enter your name.
Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter your recipient's email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter your message.
Sending message

Syndicate

Republish or promote to:
logging in Saving...

Syndicate

Republished On
Post Status
logging in Saving...