io9

  • io9
  • science
  • overmind
  • kotaku
  • gizmodo
Profile logout login
In Burroughs' second Barsoom series, the right girl winds up in the right body

In Burroughs' second Barsoom series, the right girl winds up in the right body #bookreview #readingbarsoom

A syllabus and book list for novice students of science fiction literature

A syllabus and book list for novice students of science fiction literature #scifi101 #books

The io9 Book Club is in session! Let's discuss "The Hundred Thousand Kingdoms"

The io9 Book Club is in session! Let's discuss "The Hundred Thousand Kingdoms" #io9bookclub #thehundredthousand

September Books Offer Time Travel, Vampires, and Viral Marketing

September Books Offer Time Travel, Vampires, and Viral Marketing #books #bookreview

Physicists build a "quantum cat" out of light

Physicists build a "quantum cat" out of light #quantumphysics #physics

Peter Wingfield answers 11 of your deepest Highlander questions!

Peter Wingfield answers 11 of your deepest Highlander questions! #exclusive #highlander

The ultimate guide to September's science fiction awesomeness!

The ultimate guide to September's science fiction awesomeness! #io9calendar #calendar

io9

FAQ. Include # before tag:
#observationdeck, #tips, #calendar, #corrections, etc.

San Francisco, 7:52 AM
Thu Sep 2
24 posts in the last 24 hours


Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
sending request

IO9 TEAM

Tip your editors:

Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |

Managing Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |

Senior Reporter:
Meredith Woerner |

Assistant Editor:
Cyriaque Lamar |

Reporter:
Alasdair Wilkins |

Contributing Editor:
Marc Bernardin |

Graphic Design:
Stephanie Fox |

Contributors:
Tim Barribeau |
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Dr. Dave Goldberg |
Josh Wimmer
Chris Braak

Interns:
Mary Ratliff |
Kelly Faircloth
Lindsay Wolfe

Media Requests:


Follow io9 on:
Twitter
Facebook
All the Cool New Stuff From Apple Today on Gizmodo
SF 101: Science Fiction For Beginners on io9
Examining video games' fixation with firearms — at a safe distance — all week long.

SUBSCRIBE TO IO9 RSS



Welcome to io9

  • Sign up for the io9 Daily and get one great story in your inbox each day.


    Please enter your email address.
    Please enter a valid email address.
    sending request

  • Join io9 on Facebook. Click "Like" to get the most important stories in your News Feed.

Please confirm your birth date:

Please enter a valid date
Please enter your full birth year
This content is restricted.

Two New Methods Lend Scientific Muscle To Detecting Art Forgeries

If you're looking to sell some phony art, your time appears to be running out. Dartmouth researchers can spot art forgeries using neuroscience techniques, while Polish scientists use medical imaging technology to do likewise.

The Dartmouth College team of James Hughes, Daniel Graham, and Daniel Rockmore took an established part of neuroscience - the notion of sparse coding - and applied it to the art world. Sparse coding technology imitates the human visual system by attempting to replicate the ways in which the brain takes complex images and breaks them down into simple patterns thanks to a series of filter neurons. The brain has developed such that it uses relatively few neurons to process common patterns in the natural world, although it needs many more neurons to deal with complex images with which it is unfamiliar.

The team took this technology and applied it to real paintings by Flemish master Peter Bruegel and a set of forgeries:

Essentially, they imagined a visual system that had evolved while being exposed only to Bruegel drawings. Thus, it would process Bruegel drawings using few filters but would have to use many more when looking at anything else-including Bruegel forgeries.

To create this model the researchers obtained a number of genuine and fake Bruegel drawings. They digitally broke the authentic works up into smaller pieces and using sparse coding technology identified the smallest or "sparsest" set of those pieces that could be used as filters. This set of filters essentially quantified Bruegel's unique artistic style by capturing properties repeated throughout the artist's works.

They then processed both the real and fake Bruegel paintings using the system they had created. The real paintings needed far fewer filters in order to process the real ones than it did the fake ones. No matter how good the forgeries were to the naked eye, they broke down into a set of patterns wholly unrecognizable to the sparse coding system that only knew genuine Bruegel works. The research team believes that this represents a technological breakthrough in art authentication in that their method is considerably more accurate than any other yet devised, although they stress their model is not meant to replace the work of art experts.

Meanwhile, at Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland, Associate Professor Piotr Targowski has appropriated another trick from medical technology to spot forgeries. This time, the focus is not on outright forgeries, but fake additions to genuine paintings, such as forged artist signatures added years after the fact. Targowski uses Optical Coherence Tomography, originally created to produce 3D images of the layers of the retina, to spot different layers in the painting:

...easel paintings prepared according to traditional techniques consist of multiple layers. The artist, for instance, first applies a glue sizing over the canvas to ensure proper adhesion of later layers. Those layers may include an outline of the painting, the painting itself, layers of semitransparent glazes, and finally transparent varnish.

If the signature or some other inscription is in an out-of-place layer, they can conclude that the element was added at a later date. Targowski and his team have already detected later additions in a couple of 18th and 19th century oil paintings. Perhaps the best news for art lovers is that this method does no physical harm to the paintings. As such, its only their reputations that risk being damaged.

[DUJS Online and OfficialWire]

Send an email to Alasdair Wilkins, the author of this post, at alasdair@io9.com.


Upload an image | Add an image URL ×
×
×
Choose a file to upload:
×
Attribute comment to:
Please enter an email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
Dsmvwl | Admin | Promote only | Promote to frontpage | Approve user | Ban user  ×
Loading comments ... -/|\
Earlier discussions Paging in progress... | Other discussions | Show all discussions | Show featured discussions only | Expand all replies Collapse all replies
Start a new discussion
By Alasdair Wilkins
share on facebook
Feb 10, 2010 11:45 AM 1,669 views on this post, 211 new visitors1,669 9
Edit » Set to Draft » Invite » Syndicate » Edit timestamp »

Syndicate this post


Site:
Mode:

sending request
cancel
more about #artforgery
read more: #madscience, #artforgery, #artauthentication, #art, #science
 
  • Archives
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Register

One last thing!

While we don't require an email address to sign up, consider adding one to your account. This will give you the ability to reset a lost or stolen password.

Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need a login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

Your username will be the part of your email address before the @ sign. If you wish to remain anonymous, create your own username by signing up for a Gawker account here.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Already Have an Account?
Login with your Facebook or existing io9 account.

Questions?
Learn more at the Comment FAQ.



Invite a friend to comment

To invite people to this discussion, send them an email invitation by pasting in a list of comma-separated email addresses and then clicking Send invites.

Please enter at least one email address.
Please use valid email addresses.
Please use unique email addresses.
Please enter fewer addresses.
requesting invites

Send a link

Send a link to this post 'Two New Methods Lend Scientific Muscle To Detecting Art Forgeries' via email:

Please enter your name.
Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter your recipient's email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter your message.
Sending message

Syndicate

Republish or promote to:
logging in Saving...

Syndicate

Republished On
Post Status
logging in Saving...