Enter your username and password.
Loading comments ... 

I like how neither of those scenes occurred, although I can see the necessity of the second one, as the revelation that the book was owned by someone styling themselves "The Half-Blood Prince" was entirely non-verbal in the books.
The first clip just confuses me, as exciting as it looked.
Reply
@smartboydan is banned from Deadspin :(: I understand having to make cuts from the books, and that's fine.
But adding completely new scenes? Why not just include some of the stuff they cut?? I've never understood that.
Reply
@HootieMac: Because some things work very well on paper, and others work very well on screen. Often, what works with one doesn't work with the other. In a flick, you've got to keep the pace moving along, so you've gotta make some changes (LOTR series is a good example of this). It's not good or bad on it's own, it's how well these new scenes fit in with the whole.
Reply
@smartboydan is banned from Deadspin :(:
If I recall, there was a subplot in the book where a girl tried to slip Harry some love potion, but it was in a box of chocolates, not muffins.
Reply
@HootieMac: Like instead of cutting the Marauders Map from the second movie and instead putting in a scene where they eat candy that makes them make noises? That was the second movie, right?
Reply
@SetDipSwitchesTo_GitEmSteveDav...: Marauders Map was in the movies, the only thing they didnt include was WHO made it (IE that his father sirius and lupus where the creators of the map)
Reply
@Jim Topoleski: That's what I meant. They neglected to mention that somewhat important point, but instead made some candy that made you howl like a monkey.
Reply
@smartboydan is banned from Deadspin :(: Thanks, I don't get the purpose of that first one either. Whyyyy?
Reply
@2DaysTillTheState_GitEmSteveDa...: I have in general been increasingly happy with the Potter movies. They manage to stay true to the spirit of the stories without feeling enslaved by the details of them.
Reply







