Enter your username and password.

...but Scott, you took the aliens perspective OUT of perspective.
The environmental slant is a disservice to the still verey relevent angle of TDTESS's story. Klaatu didn't care if we blew ourselves to hell in a handbasket, just as long as we didn't take the universe with us. And THAT was a direct analogy for the nuclear capable countries of the world constantly threatening war against each other, while ignoring the billions of other people who would be affected by their stupid wars. This idea STILL applies, so why change the scope of the story???
Reply@AmishJohn: That gun metaphor makes no sense at all considering this isn't about weapons and war but pollution. They aren't trying to stop violence from spreading by using violence, but willing to kill to save a house in a housing shortage.
ReplyNow fictionally, Klaatu's idea was to stop Man from jetting into space and terrorizing others with our rockets. Realistically, our idea is to utilize space to shoot fancier rockets at "terrorists". Certainly the ecological issues present themselves, but the centric issue is still our inherent violent nature.
ReplyBoth films are fundamentally flawed.
If aliens have tech to travel the universe then they surely can teach us a thing or two and fix us.
It's the Jesus complex. I'm not going to help you but in a little while now I'm going to kill everybody I don't like. Tata for now.
Or Narnia (again Jesus complex). Aslan hides out in the woods while everybody fighting for his cause voluntarily goes into battle to make the world a better place. "You didn't ask for my help." Fuck you Aslan, they didn't ask the mouse for help and even he, a lowely mouse, volunteered to do the right thing.
Reply






