<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[io9: Designer Baby]]></title>
		
		<link>http://io9.com/tag/designer baby</link>
		<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://gawker.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
		<description><![CDATA[io9 posts tagged Designer Baby]]></description>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[No, Bitches, It's Not a Designer Baby]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read No, Bitches, It's Not a Designer Baby" href="http://io9.com/mad-genetic-engineering/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">madgeneticengineering</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read No, Bitches, It's Not a Designer Baby" href="http://io9.com/389755/no-bitches-its-not-a-designer-baby" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read No, Bitches, It's Not a Designer Baby" alt="Click here to read No, Bitches, It's Not a Designer Baby" src="http://cache.io9.com/assets/images/8/2008/05/small_designerbaby.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				 It's inevitable: the media has not only confused human reproductive cloning with "designer babies," but in fact they have confused a stem cell experiment with designer babies too. I love my sensationalist science as much as the next person, but the <em>London Times</em> has gone batshit <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article3908516.ece">with its reports</a> that a GM human embryo could lead to "designer babies" out there in the wilds of science land. Now all these anti-baby engineering groups are going nuts because nobody has bothered to explain the science to them. Even Wired picked up <a href="http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/05/the-first-genet.html">the story</a>, though thankfully without the "designer baby" crap. So what's the deal? When will you get your designer baby with wings and mutant powers?				<a href="http://io9.com/389755/no-bitches-its-not-a-designer-baby" title="Click here to read more about No, Bitches, It's Not a Designer Baby">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/389755/no-bitches-its-not-a-designer-baby]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-389755]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[mad genetic engineering]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Clones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[designer baby]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shut up bitches]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 May 2008 15:48:50 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Annalee Newitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=389755&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

