<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[io9: Hollywood Slavebots]]></title>
		
		<link>http://io9.com/tag/hollywood slavebots</link>
		<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://gawker.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
		<description><![CDATA[io9 posts tagged Hollywood Slavebots]]></description>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Is the U.S. remake of Let The Right One In doomed?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Is the U.S. remake of Let The Right One In doomed?" href="http://io9.com/let-the-right-one-in/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">lettherightonein</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Is the U.S. remake of Let The Right One In doomed?" href="http://io9.com/5583525/is-the-us-remake-of-let-the-right-one-in-doomed" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Is the U.S. remake of Let The Right One In doomed?" alt="Click here to read Is the U.S. remake of Let The Right One In doomed?" src="http://cache.io9.com/assets/images/8/2010/07/chloe.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Just when we were starting to think the U.S. version of <em>Let The Right One In</em> might be worth watching, it turns out we may not get the chance. The culprit, once again, is studio turmoil.				<a href="http://io9.com/5583525/is-the-us-remake-of-let-the-right-one-in-doomed" title="Click here to read more about Is the U.S. remake of Let The Right One In doomed?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5583525/is-the-us-remake-of-let-the-right-one-in-doomed]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5583525]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Let the right one in]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA["Kodi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Chloe Moretz]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hollywood Slavebots]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Let me in]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Matt Reeves]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Smit-mcphee']]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Studio troubles]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Vampires]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 Jul 2010 14:30:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Jane Anders]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5583525&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A Nation-By-Nation Breakdown Of Avatar's Moolah]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read A Nation-By-Nation Breakdown Of Avatar's Moolah" href="http://io9.com/cash/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">cash</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read A Nation-By-Nation Breakdown Of Avatar's Moolah" href="http://io9.com/5445912/a-nation+by+nation-breakdown-of-avatars-moolah" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read A Nation-By-Nation Breakdown Of Avatar's Moolah" alt="Click here to read A Nation-By-Nation Breakdown Of Avatar's Moolah" src="http://cache.io9.com/assets/images/8/2010/01/custom_1263261407805_avatarrussia_01.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				 We know that <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jamescameron" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jamescameron" href="http://io9.com/tag/jamescameron/">James Cameron</a>'s <em>Avatar</em> has raked in a record-breaking $1.34 billion internationally. But where exactly did Cameron make the most greenbacks off his epic of 10-foot-tall cerulean cat people who make love with their hairdos?				<a href="http://io9.com/5445912/a-nation+by+nation-breakdown-of-avatars-moolah" title="Click here to read more about A Nation-By-Nation Breakdown Of Avatar's Moolah">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5445912/a-nation+by+nation-breakdown-of-avatars-moolah]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5445912]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Cash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hollywood slave bots]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[James Cameron]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Jan 2010 06:30:00 PST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cyriaque Lamar]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5445912&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[5 Theories That Explain Why Avatar Was Such A Huge Hit]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read 5 Theories That Explain Why Avatar Was Such A Huge Hit" href="http://io9.com/avatar/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">avatar</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read 5 Theories That Explain Why Avatar Was Such A Huge Hit" href="http://io9.com/5439860/5-theories-that-explain-why-avatar-was-such-a-huge-hit" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read 5 Theories That Explain Why Avatar Was Such A Huge Hit" alt="Click here to read 5 Theories That Explain Why Avatar Was Such A Huge Hit" src="http://cache.io9.com/assets/images/8/2012/01/small_211f101d4d3b7b6fb2f20619bc65597e.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Now that <em>Avatar</em> is on track to be the<a href="http://www.ksbitv.com/news/entertainment/?feed=bim&id=80714657"> second biggest film of all time</a>, pundits are starting to wonder if there's more to its success than Art Nouveau pterodactyls in 3-D. Here are five explanations they've come up with.				<a href="http://io9.com/5439860/5-theories-that-explain-why-avatar-was-such-a-huge-hit" title="Click here to read more about 5 Theories That Explain Why Avatar Was Such A Huge Hit">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5439860/5-theories-that-explain-why-avatar-was-such-a-huge-hit]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5439860]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hollywood Slavebots]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[James Cameron]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Overmind]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Terminator Salvation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:00:00 PST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Jane Anders]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5439860&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Woman Behind Children Of Men Takes Over Universal Pictures]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged DONNA LANGLEY" title="Click here to read more posts tagged DONNA LANGLEY" href="http://io9.com/tag/donna-langley/">Donna Langley</a> just became the first British woman to run a Hollywood studio &mdash; and joined a very exclusive club of female power-brokers in Hollywood &mdash; by becoming co-chair of Universal Studios. In her previous role as president of production, she was responsible for <em>Mamma Mia!</em>, one of the few big women-focused hits of the past few years. And more pertinently to our interests, she oversaw <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CHILDREN OF MEN" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CHILDREN OF MEN" href="http://io9.com/tag/children-of-men/">Children Of Men</a></em> and had some involvement in the <em>Wolfman </em>movie. She also oversaw the Paul Greengrass <em>Bourne </em>sequels. She'll be in charge of the creative side at Universal, replacing Marc Shmuger and David Linde, who were fired after a string of flops including the underwhelming <em>Land Of The Lost</em>. Let's hope Langley's ascension means a few smarter science fiction films &mdash; and maybe a few that are aware that women can be more than just the "love interest" or the "ass-kicking supporting character in tight pants." [<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2009/oct/08/donna-langley-universal-pictures">Guardian</a>]				<a href="http://io9.com/5377740/the-woman-behind-children-of-men-takes-over-universal-pictures" title="Click here to read more about The Woman Behind Children Of Men Takes Over Universal Pictures">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5377740/the-woman-behind-children-of-men-takes-over-universal-pictures]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5377740]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[children of men]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Donna langley]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hollywood Slavebots]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 Oct 2009 07:00:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Jane Anders]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5377740&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Has SciFi Finally Worked Its Way To Hollywood's Big Kids Table?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Has SciFi Finally Worked Its Way To Hollywood's Big Kids Table?" href="http://io9.com/hollywood-slavebots/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">hollywoodslavebots</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Has SciFi Finally Worked Its Way To Hollywood's Big Kids Table?" href="http://io9.com/5026582/has-scifi-finally-worked-its-way-to-hollywoods-big-kids-table" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Has SciFi Finally Worked Its Way To Hollywood's Big Kids Table?" alt="Click here to read Has SciFi Finally Worked Its Way To Hollywood's Big Kids Table?" src="http://cache.io9.com/assets/images/8/2008/07/oscars.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<em>Dark Knight's </em>Oscar buzz has been circling since the first "Why So Serious?" ad. And now that some science fiction television series garnered a handful of Emmy nominations yesterday, people are wondering if this could be the year the red-headed stepchild of the entertainment industry gets a well deserved pat on the back from Hollywood. Sadly, the answer is probably no, because while the buzz is great, signs of blatant disregard for genre shows and movies are still glaring at us from the award show podium. And Hollywood is more than happy to tell us why.				<a href="http://io9.com/5026582/has-scifi-finally-worked-its-way-to-hollywoods-big-kids-table" title="Click here to read more about Has SciFi Finally Worked Its Way To Hollywood's Big Kids Table?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5026582/has-scifi-finally-worked-its-way-to-hollywoods-big-kids-table]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5026582]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Hollywood Slavebots]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Batman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Battlestar Galactica]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Emmys]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lost]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The Dark Knight]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Jul 2008 08:20:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meredith Woerner]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5026582&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[In The Battle Between 3D And IMAX, We All Lose]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read In The Battle Between 3D And IMAX, We All Lose" href="http://io9.com/hollywood-slavebots/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">hollywoodslavebots</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read In The Battle Between 3D And IMAX, We All Lose" href="http://io9.com/5023128/in-the-battle-between-3d-and-imax-we-all-lose" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read In The Battle Between 3D And IMAX, We All Lose" alt="Click here to read In The Battle Between 3D And IMAX, We All Lose" src="http://cache.io9.com/assets/images/8/2008/07/dKimax.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Now that <em>Dark Knight </em>director Chris Nolan has boasted about shooting his bat-epic on IMAX how many will follow in his footsteps and make movies for the big boy screen? <em>Flight Of The Dragon</em> has <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i6e371b8ae16a0b5b4e9dba2d4d4a00e1">announced </a>that it will be going the way of the Bat and filming the live-action dragon flick in 4K resolution for IMAX release. And while it's not particularly scifi, everyone knows that once you get the dragons, zombies and superheroes are never far behind. But with the rise of <em>Avatar</em> and other 3D scifi epics (who also combine IMAX screenings with their 3D techniques) are we about to see a rift between 3D and IMAX technology, as Nolan seems to think? More importantly, is storytelling going to take a backseat to 3D and IMAX whizbangery? 				<a href="http://io9.com/5023128/in-the-battle-between-3d-and-imax-we-all-lose" title="Click here to read more about In The Battle Between 3D And IMAX, We All Lose">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5023128/in-the-battle-between-3d-and-imax-we-all-lose]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5023128]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Hollywood Slavebots]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3-d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Batman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[christopher nolan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fly me to the moon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Imax]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[James Cameron]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Journey To The Center Of The Earth]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The Dark Knight]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:30:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meredith Woerner]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5023128&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Are We In For A New Anime Hurricane?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Are We In For A New Anime Hurricane?" href="http://io9.com/hollywood-slavebots/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">hollywoodslavebots</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Are We In For A New Anime Hurricane?" href="http://io9.com/5022718/are-we-in-for-a-new-anime-hurricane" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Are We In For A New Anime Hurricane?" alt="Click here to read Are We In For A New Anime Hurricane?" src="http://cache.io9.com/assets/images/8/2008/07/c2/2d/c22d8c0d512ee067d666c9f9c8988d48.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				It's a good year to be a comic book writer. You can't throw a collectible at a Con without hitting a graphic novel that's just been optioned for a movie. From Marc Guggenheim's <em>Resurrection</em> to <em>Hiding In Time</em>, comics are the new Hollywood pitches. And are Japanese manga and anime next? Astro Boy's studio Imagi just got a hefty <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117988515.html?categoryid=13&cs=1">new investor</a>, so it's looking more and more as if 2009 will be the year of the big-screen anime adaptation.				<a href="http://io9.com/5022718/are-we-in-for-a-new-anime-hurricane" title="Click here to read more about Are We In For A New Anime Hurricane?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5022718/are-we-in-for-a-new-anime-hurricane]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5022718]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Hollywood Slavebots]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[akira]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Astro Boy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gatchaman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ghost in the shell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Robotech]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:30:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meredith Woerner]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5022718&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[SAG Strike: Much Ado About Nothing, Or Disaster For Scifi?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read SAG Strike: Much Ado About Nothing, Or Disaster For Scifi?" href="http://io9.com/hollywood-slavebots/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">hollywoodslavebots</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read SAG Strike: Much Ado About Nothing, Or Disaster For Scifi?" href="http://io9.com/5021625/sag-strike-much-ado-about-nothing-or-disaster-for-scifi" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read SAG Strike: Much Ado About Nothing, Or Disaster For Scifi?" alt="Click here to read SAG Strike: Much Ado About Nothing, Or Disaster For Scifi?" src="http://cache.io9.com/assets/images/8/2008/07/2a/af/2aaf08b505162959f7ed18ed205f0a45.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				With all the fussing and fretting over the possible Screen Actors Guild strike, it's surprising that it's so far gone nowhere, and doesn't seem to be harming our beloved scifi movies at all. Was it the fact that people were tired of talking about a strike or did the public just not care what the actors had to say? The bottom line, movies are robot soldiering on, and to prove it <em>Terminator 4</em> published some set pictures. Click through for <em>T4</em> pics and strike round up.				<a href="http://io9.com/5021625/sag-strike-much-ado-about-nothing-or-disaster-for-scifi" title="Click here to read more about SAG Strike: Much Ado About Nothing, Or Disaster For Scifi?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5021625/sag-strike-much-ado-about-nothing-or-disaster-for-scifi]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5021625]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Hollywood Slavebots]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sag strike]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Strike]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[T4]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[terminator]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Terminator 4]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Terminator: Salvation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[transformers 2]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:30:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meredith Woerner]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5021625&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hancock Is A Filthy Dirty Cheater]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Hancock Is A Filthy Dirty Cheater" href="http://io9.com/hollywood-slavebots/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">hollywoodslavebots</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Hancock Is A Filthy Dirty Cheater" href="http://io9.com/5021281/hancock-is-a-filthy-dirty-cheater" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Hancock Is A Filthy Dirty Cheater" alt="Click here to read Hancock Is A Filthy Dirty Cheater" src="http://cache.io9.com/assets/images/8/2008/07/b9/91/b991f6bab93ad55786c7639a9ced5a79.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<em>Hancock</em> uses all the tricks in Sony Pictures' bag to get people to believe it's not terrible. But all of it's slick rick Hollywood actions will not let it prosper. I am well aware that almost every big studio "opens" its major movies the night before in hopes of lumping in the midnight and late hour screenings into the overall opening-day numbers. But Hancock's brazen 7:00 pm opening on the Tuesday before its actual July 3rd release is a desperate attempt to grab every little ticket purchase it can. Click for more on the tawdry deceptions of <em>Hancock</em>.				<a href="http://io9.com/5021281/hancock-is-a-filthy-dirty-cheater" title="Click here to read more about Hancock Is A Filthy Dirty Cheater">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5021281/hancock-is-a-filthy-dirty-cheater]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5021281]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Hollywood Slavebots]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hancock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Will Smith]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:43:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meredith Woerner]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5021281&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[George Lucas Will Change The Way Hollywood Works — Again]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read George Lucas Will Change The Way Hollywood Works — Again" href="http://io9.com/hollywood-slavebots/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">hollywoodslavebots</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read George Lucas Will Change The Way Hollywood Works — Again" href="http://io9.com/5020886/george-lucas-will-change-the-way-hollywood-works---again" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read George Lucas Will Change The Way Hollywood Works — Again" alt="Click here to read George Lucas Will Change The Way Hollywood Works — Again" src="http://cache.io9.com/assets/images/8/2008/06/7b/4a/7b4a41e04de114802b41b1b36831e7ac.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<em>Welcome to Hollywood Slavebots, a new column where I'll uncover the seedy underverse of scifi Hollywood to show you how money-grubbing studios, bad contracts and bickering execs will change your scifi entertainment future.</em> Thirty years ago, George Lucas changed Hollywood forever, with the original <em>Star Wars</em>. Now he's trying to do it again, with a new animated <em>Star Wars</em> series, <em>Clone Wars</em>, which broke all the studios' rules for how TV and movies are created. Click through for details, plus a gallery of new <em>Clone Wars</em> concept art.				<a href="http://io9.com/5020886/george-lucas-will-change-the-way-hollywood-works---again" title="Click here to read more about George Lucas Will Change The Way Hollywood Works — Again">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5020886/george-lucas-will-change-the-way-hollywood-works---again]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5020886]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Hollywood Slavebots]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Clone Wars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[George Lucas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star Wars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star Wars: Clone Wars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:51:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meredith Woerner]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5020886&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

