<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[io9: Intellectual Property]]></title>
		
		<link>http://io9.com/tag/intellectual property</link>
		<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://gawker.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
		<description><![CDATA[io9 posts tagged Intellectual Property]]></description>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Why we can't have a full-size AT-AT from Star Wars, or an app that makes your iPhone look like a PADD from Star Trek]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Why we can't have a full-size AT-AT from Star Wars, or an app that makes your iPhone look like a PADD from Star Trek" href="http://io9.com/star-wars/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">starwars</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Why we can't have a full-size AT-AT from Star Wars, or an app that makes your iPhone look like a PADD from Star Trek" href="http://io9.com/5793842/why-we-cant-have-a-full+size-at+at-from-star-wars-or-an-app-that-makes-your-iphone-look-like-a-padd-from-star-trek" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Why we can't have a full-size AT-AT from Star Wars, or an app that makes your iPhone look like a PADD from Star Trek" alt="Click here to read Why we can't have a full-size AT-AT from Star Wars, or an app that makes your iPhone look like a PADD from Star Trek" src="http://cache.io9.com/assets/images/8/2011/04/small_tumblr_ljnb73os181qih3fb.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Copyright concerns put a halt to two particularly exciting geeky projects in the past week. Lucasfilm put the kibosh on plans to raise money to build a full-size <em>Star Wars</em> AT-AT walker, and CBS stopped a Star Trek-themed "DiagnosticPADD" app.				<a href="http://io9.com/5793842/why-we-cant-have-a-full+size-at+at-from-star-wars-or-an-app-that-makes-your-iphone-look-like-a-padd-from-star-trek" title="Click here to read more about Why we can't have a full-size AT-AT from Star Wars, or an app that makes your iPhone look like a PADD from Star Trek">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5793842/why-we-cant-have-a-full+size-at+at-from-star-wars-or-an-app-that-makes-your-iphone-look-like-a-padd-from-star-trek]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5793842]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Star Wars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star wars: the empire strikes back]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:30:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Jane Anders]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5793842&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Judge rules that Todd McFarlane owes Neil Gaiman back pay for Spawn characters]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Judge rules that Todd McFarlane owes Neil Gaiman back pay for Spawn characters" href="http://io9.com/lawsuits/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">lawsuits</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Judge rules that Todd McFarlane owes Neil Gaiman back pay for Spawn characters" href="http://io9.com/5601381/judge-rules-that-todd-mcfarlane-owes-neil-gaiman-back-pay-for-spawn-characters" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Judge rules that Todd McFarlane owes Neil Gaiman back pay for Spawn characters" alt="Click here to read Judge rules that Todd McFarlane owes Neil Gaiman back pay for Spawn characters" src="http://cache.io9.com/assets/images/8/2012/01/small_ab3b167b18722a9564cbddb45add039e.png"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				In 1992, Neil Gaiman created Medieval Spawn and Angela, a warrior angel, for Todd McFarlane's up-and-coming <em>Spawn </em>comic. Years later, the characters "Dark Ages Spawn" and "Tiffany and Domina" debuted in <em>Spawn</em>. McFarlane must now pay Gaiman for these derivatives.				<a href="http://io9.com/5601381/judge-rules-that-todd-mcfarlane-owes-neil-gaiman-back-pay-for-spawn-characters" title="Click here to read more about Judge rules that Todd McFarlane owes Neil Gaiman back pay for Spawn characters">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5601381/judge-rules-that-todd-mcfarlane-owes-neil-gaiman-back-pay-for-spawn-characters]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5601381]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Angela]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Comics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Dark ages spawn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Domina]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Medieval spawn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Neil Gaiman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[spawn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[todd mcfarlane]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:23:22 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cyriaque Lamar]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5601381&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[What Would SF Look Like If Copyright Only Lasted 20 Years?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read What Would SF Look Like If Copyright Only Lasted 20 Years?" href="http://io9.com/poll/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">poll</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read What Would SF Look Like If Copyright Only Lasted 20 Years?" href="http://io9.com/5127860/what-would-sf-look-like-if-copyright-only-lasted-20-years" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read What Would SF Look Like If Copyright Only Lasted 20 Years?" alt="Click here to read What Would SF Look Like If Copyright Only Lasted 20 Years?" src="http://cache.io9.com/assets/images/8/2009/01/starteam.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				In Paul Melko's <em>Walls Of The Universe</em>, our hero visits an alternate world where patents and copyrights only last a short time. What would happen to science fiction if this was true in our world?				<a href="http://io9.com/5127860/what-would-sf-look-like-if-copyright-only-lasted-20-years" title="Click here to read more about What Would SF Look Like If Copyright Only Lasted 20 Years?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5127860/what-would-sf-look-like-if-copyright-only-lasted-20-years]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5127860]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Poll]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[alternate universes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star Wars]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:30:00 PST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Jane Anders]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5127860&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fox On Watchmen Lawsuit: Don't Blame Us!]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Fox On Watchmen Lawsuit: Don't Blame Us!" href="http://io9.com/watchmen/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">watchmen</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Fox On Watchmen Lawsuit: Don't Blame Us!" href="http://io9.com/5040035/fox-on-watchmen-lawsuit-dont-blame-us" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Fox On Watchmen Lawsuit: Don't Blame Us!" alt="Click here to read Fox On Watchmen Lawsuit: Don't Blame Us!" src="http://cache.io9.com/assets/images/8/2008/08/watchmen_movie.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Plagued by fans complaining about the possibility of being robbed of the <em>Watchmen</em> movie by a copyright infringement lawsuit from 20th Century Fox, a statement from the studio has asked fans back off, direct their anger elsewhere and respect proper ownership of intellectual property. Because, you know, that worked so well for the record industry.				<a href="http://io9.com/5040035/fox-on-watchmen-lawsuit-dont-blame-us" title="Click here to read more about Fox On Watchmen Lawsuit: Don't Blame Us!">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5040035/fox-on-watchmen-lawsuit-dont-blame-us]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5040035]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[watchmen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lawrence gordon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[warners]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 22 Aug 2008 06:30:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5040035&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lawsuit Won't Stop The Watchmen]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Lawsuit Won't Stop The Watchmen" href="http://io9.com/watchmen/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">watchmen</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Lawsuit Won't Stop The Watchmen" href="http://io9.com/5038694/lawsuit-wont-stop-the-watchmen" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Lawsuit Won't Stop The Watchmen" alt="Click here to read Lawsuit Won't Stop The Watchmen" src="http://cache.io9.com/assets/images/8/2012/01/214f6d158167324e4316fe49c455f769.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<span class="customObject framed item_0"><a href="index.php?op=showcustomobject&postId=5038694&item=0" rel="lyteframe" rev="width: 75px; height: 102px;" class="noHrefOverride">Click to view</a></span>It's looking bad for the <em>Watchmen</em> movie, now that a judge is allowing a lawsuit by Fox over the film rights to the famous graphic novel to go forward. It's even worse when you realize that the same judge ruled against Warner Bros. in a case involving the rights to a <em>Dukes Of Hazzard</em> movie two years ago. But the reality is, the Dukes got their movie, and so will the Minutemen.  

Fox is seeking an injunction to stop the March release of Warners' <em>Watchmen</em> movie, and they've managed to find the most sympathetic judge in L.A., Lawrence Feess. In a nutshell, Fox argues that Warners obtained movie rights from producer Lawrence Gordon, but Fox already owned the rights to distribute any movie made by Gordon. In a similar case involving the <em>Dukes</em> movie, Judge Feess granted a preliminary injunction preventing Warners from releasing the film. 

But in the <em>Hazzard</em> case, Warner Bros. agreed to pay the plaintiffs at least $17.5 million to settle their claims, and the movie came out as planned. (In retrospect, Warners may regret that settlement, considering how badly <em>Dukes</em> did.) It seems likely that Fox is simply lining up for a payout, and <em>Watchmen</em> will come out on time - but it'll simply be even more expensive than Warner Bros. already bargained on.  <em>Watchmen Babies image from <a href="http://time-blog.com/nerd_world/2008/02/">Time.com</a>.</em> [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/19/business/media/19movie.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin">New York Times</a>]				<a href="http://io9.com/5038694/lawsuit-wont-stop-the-watchmen" title="Click here to read more about Lawsuit Won't Stop The Watchmen">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5038694/lawsuit-wont-stop-the-watchmen]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5038694]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[watchmen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Dukes of Hazzard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Superheroes]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:40:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Jane Anders]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5038694&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[What Copyright Ruling Really Means For Superman]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read What Copyright Ruling Really Means For Superman" href="http://io9.com/superman/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">superman</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read What Copyright Ruling Really Means For Superman" href="http://io9.com/373875/what-copyright-ruling-really-means-for-superman" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read What Copyright Ruling Really Means For Superman" alt="Click here to read What Copyright Ruling Really Means For Superman" src="http://cache.io9.com/assets/images/8/2008/03/small_action1.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				If you're concerned that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/29/business/media/29comics.html?_r=1&ref=business&oref=slogin">the family of Superman co-creator Jerry Siegel regaining part of the copyright to <em>Action Comics</em> #1</a> means that you're going to be deprived of new Superman comics or episodes of <em>Smallville</em>, then I have good news for you. That's not going to happen anytime soon, as DC Comics still owns half of the character's copyright, and most of the character's mythology. Over at Uncivil Society, lawyer Jeff Trexler has taken the time to make sure that even the legally-stupid like myself understand just what's going on with the battle over the Man of Steel.				<a href="http://io9.com/373875/what-copyright-ruling-really-means-for-superman" title="Click here to read more about What Copyright Ruling Really Means For Superman">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/373875/what-copyright-ruling-really-means-for-superman]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-373875]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Superman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[action comics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Comics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Dc Comics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[siegel family]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:30:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=373875&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Licensing Problems Wreck Bionic Woman's Cyber-Limbs]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Licensing Problems Wreck Bionic Woman's Cyber-Limbs" href="http://io9.com/bionic-woman/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">bionicwoman</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Licensing Problems Wreck Bionic Woman's Cyber-Limbs" href="http://io9.com/317030/licensing-problems-wreck-bionic-womans-cyber+limbs" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Licensing Problems Wreck Bionic Woman's Cyber-Limbs" alt="Click here to read Licensing Problems Wreck Bionic Woman's Cyber-Limbs" src="http://cache.io9.com/assets/images/8/2007/10/small_71886362-thumb.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a href="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2007/10/718863622.php" onclick="window.open('http://io9.com/assets/resources/2007/10/718863622.php','popup','width=2163,height=3000,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"></a>Why are there no cool cybernetic limbs (like on the left) in the new <em>Bionic Woman</em> TV show? Many of us speculated that the creators thought nanobots were cooler, and regular old cyborgs were too old-school. But it turns out the answer has more to do with legalities, according to creator David Eick:				<a href="http://io9.com/317030/licensing-problems-wreck-bionic-womans-cyber+limbs" title="Click here to read more about Licensing Problems Wreck Bionic Woman's Cyber-Limbs">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/317030/licensing-problems-wreck-bionic-womans-cyber+limbs]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-317030]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[bionic woman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bionics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cybernetics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cyborg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:21:04 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[charliejane]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=317030&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

