Is It Time To Retire The Word "Epic"?

You'll see lots of rants on the internet claiming the word "epic" is overused. It's become a blanket synonym for "fun," and people say "I had an epic bath" with zero irony. But maybe this is just a symptom of a larger problem. Maybe the word "epic" in general has lost all meaning, including when we talk about fantasy.

Top image: Gandalf vs. Balrog, artist unknown.

It's easy to find those rants about "epic" being an overused term for "pretty decent" — some of them happened after Cosmopolitan had a cover promising "Epic Sex," which somehow didn't involve having sex while riding on dragons or fighting off Orcs with a crossbow mid-coitus:

Is It Time To Retire The Word "Epic"?

And sure, "epic" is overused by people on the internet and in publishing, when they need another word for "awesome" or "ridiculously fun." But maybe it's just overused in general? Maybe too many stories have been described as "epics," and the notion of epic storytelling (or "epic fantasy") has lost some of its edge?

The history of the word epic

The word "epic" comes from the Greek "epikos," meaning a poem or story, and it only became an adjective in the late 16th century. At first, this term was used to describe long poems with heroic narratives, in which long periods of time passed and somewhat larger-than-life heroes did great deeds. The earliest example might be The Epic of Gilgamesh, but also Homer's Iliad and Odyssey are frequently mentioned.

These epic poems, along with later ones by Virgil and others, are frequently about establishing a sense of national identity as much as celebrating heroism.

Over time, the definition has gotten a lot vaguer. As John P. McWilliams observes in his book The American Epic: Transforming a Genre, 1770-1860, "Although so loaded a term demands definition, securing a workable definition that is not idiosyncratic proves exasperating." Adds McWilliams, "one may well conclude that the word 'epic' is only a substanceless advertisement for size and length, as it has long since become for [book] jacket blurbs and film promotion."

He concludes: "Although oral heroic poetry can and has been studied as a distinct separate genre, no precise meaning of 'epic' can be found that will suit even those few texts that centuries of readers have agreed to call epics." He more or less decides that "epic" means "heroic narrative," and that everything else about the term changes over time to suit different people's needs.

Is It Time To Retire The Word "Epic"?

And in the Columbia History of American Poetry, McWilliams concludes that epics generally "celebrate heroism" and "convey the values and customs of a culture."

But it's not enough to have a heroic storyline, insists Derek Elley in The Epic Film: Myth and History: "Heroes alone do not make an epic unless the other ingredients are also present: a literary garb which dresses the action in noble style; the all-important mythic element which raises the work above mere reportage by the introduction of the irrational, the inexplicable or the magical; and the feeling of an overall unity and purpose to the work, of an embodiment of unchangeable ideals, which is frequently national."

Elley probably does the best job of anyone of pinning down what makes something "epic" rather than just "heroic" — although I'd add that there has to be the passage of time and a certain largeness to the deeds and the characters. But McWilliams is also right that the term "epic" has become a "substanceless advertisement," and is almost meaningless at this point.

So what is an epic nowadays?

In the genre world, we use the word "epic" in two different contexts — as a descriptor for the subgenre "epic fantasy," and to describe any story that's kind of long and has big fights in it.

Definitions of "epic fantasy" tend to vary — usually, it takes place in a world that's not present-day Earth, there are heroes and monsters, and people go on a long journey or quest. There tends to be a map inside the front cover. The term "epic fantasy," though, is a broad marketing term that is more or less interchangeable with "heroic fantasy," "quest fantasy" or "high fantasy."

But a lot of "epic fantasy" doesn't really have heroism, as such — there's been a trend towards morally gray characters, and people who are defined by their foibles as much as by their exploits. (See George R.R. Martin, but also a ton of others.) And it's become increasingly obvious that "epic fantasy" is a more of a marketing category (and a collection of tropes) than anything that shares an aspiration to grandeur or "dressing the action in noble style," as Elley puts it.

Is It Time To Retire The Word "Epic"?

Likewise, the term "epic" appears to be a somewhat debased coin when used generally to refer to long works of action and heroism. Partly because pop culture tends towards incoherence — so the longer a work goes on, the less likely it is to have any unifying theme or ideas any longer. After a couple movies or seasons of television or books in a series, the ideas often become increasingly fragmented and the story less cohesive generally. So length almost works against you, when it comes to the other loose requirements for an epic story.

Most of all, though, there's the sense that an epic, traditionally, conveys a unified set of cultural values. Or national identity. Tolkien's works are directly connected to Anglo-Saxon literature and traditions, and Lord of the Rings can be read as a distinct English epic.

Is It Time To Retire The Word "Epic"?

For better or worse, we live in an era when national identity is much more fractured (especially in the United States) and the sense of unifying cultural values is much less pervasive. If an epic has to appeal to a single tradition and a monolithic identity, then maybe that's something that just can't exist any more. Maybe cultural relativism killed the epic story. So in place of Greek mythology or Christianity or Anglo-Saxon traditions, we substitute vague sayings and feel-good New Age ideas, like "The Force is with you" or whatnot.

And maybe that's a good thing — maybe we don't actually need a sense of cohesive national or cultural identity any longer. Maybe it's better to embrace the fact that we live in a diverse world, and if the main function of the epic was to encourage identification with the dominant culture, maybe it's better off gone.

But even if you disagree with that last statement and consider the epic a wonderful thing, that doesn't change the fact that the term "epic" has become nearly meaningless — and a big reason for that is that we no longer live in the sort of world that created epics. It's not just that the term "epic" is overused, the idea of an epic may no longer be as relevant as it once was.

And that presents an opportunity to create a new kind of heroic story — one that's not epic, but fantastic.