<![CDATA[Comments from brianeisley]]> <![CDATA[Comments from brianeisley]]> <![CDATA[brianeisley commented on The 10,000-Year-Old Clock that Inspired Neal Stephenson's Anathem]]> @moff: Well, unlike most, I had a really good time with the Baroque Cycle and didn't think it was difficult at all. Far as I'm concerned, that's still his masterpiece.

And I realize now that much of my impression of denseness in Anathem probably had to do with the language and with the rich history that the characters are always referring to. I had to keep referring to the glossary, the chronology, and the earlier chapters of the book for quite some time.

Here's a possibly dangerous analogy: the world in Anathem, in many ways, has a similar richness and complexity as in Tolkien. Just as in Lord of the Rings, you have the physical, cultural, and linguistic relics of thousands of years of history littering the landscape.

Of course, Anathem is nowhere near as accessible as Lord of the Rings, so the comparison isn't really fair. But as an act of worldbuilding, it's one of the best attempts I've seen lately.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on The 10,000-Year-Old Clock that Inspired Neal Stephenson's Anathem]]> I'm reading an advance copy of Anathem right now. He doesn't just use the clock, but also the quasi-religious order that Long Now has predicted would have to arise to maintain it. It's a society of scientists and philosophers that have withdrawn (or, it is suggested, been forcibly segregated) from the larger society for many thousands of years, with only very occasional contact with the outside.

I'm about halfway through the book. I'm enjoying it, but it's definitely not for everyone. Even by Stephenson's standards, it's dense. And it's one of those books that has a glossary in back, so it's really slow going for the first hundred pages or so until you get used to the terminology.

But it's fascinating; he's playing around with a host of philosophical, sociological, and linguistic ideas, by placing them in an independently evolved society. It's all recognizable, but slightly skewed from the world we know. I'm looking forward to seeing how it ends.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Five Ways Reality Went Sci-Fi So Far This Century]]> Re 9/11: as usual, the Onion said it best, in their first cover story afterward: "American Life Turns Into Bad Jerry Bruckheimer Movie".

[www.theonion.com]

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Bizarre Loop Building Nears Completion]]> Man oh man, I can't wait to see the video of this thing falling in the next earthquake.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on The Last Interview of Thomas M. Disch]]> Sad news, even though I didn't much care for his fiction. I tried to read 334 some years ago and couldn't get into it.

The Dreams Our Stuff Is Made Of, however, is brilliant.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Molly Ringwald Trapped In A Robolympics Of Death]]> Man, that is some quality industrial-strength cheese.

I actually saw this in the theater when it first came out. I remember it being bad. I didn't remember it being quite this bad.

I think, though, that even then, we knew Molly Ringwald was in for great things.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on The First Ever Gynoid Is Now Complete At Last!]]> This is incredible news. I saw the 2001 version and loved it, despite large sections still being missing. I was actually thinking about buying that DVD the other day; glad I didn't.

No Moroder, though, please. The 2001 version had an excellent new recording of the original score. It worked beautifully. They need to keep that and expand it.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Which Alternate Universe Has The Best Science Fiction?]]> I say that, of course, knowing that I'm going to get roasted. I don't care.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Which Alternate Universe Has The Best Science Fiction?]]> Sorry, but I have never and will never understand why some people are so passionately devoted to Babylon 5. Whenever I've tried to watch it, the writing and acting are so bad that I almost can't finish the episode. The universe is interesting, but the execution is horrible.

IMHO, Straczynski should have gone into comics from the beginning. His Spider-man work is by far the best thing he's ever done.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Battlestar Galactica Goes Planet of the Apes]]> I think it was Earth; I see no reason to think it isn't (though I did notice that the continents were obscured, unlike the glimpse from the third-season finale).

What I think is more important is this: whatever happened on Earth, it happened recently. Very recently.

The soil is still highly radioactive. Ambient radiation from a nuclear blast drops off pretty quickly--within a few weeks--outside of ground zero. Take Hiroshima and Nagasaki: they started rebuilding almost immediately. Yes, there have been highly elevated cancer rates among survivors who were there during the attack, but those who moved in afterward have been fine. They have monuments at the sites that are now major attractions; they're perfectly safe to visit.

And it also looks like there could be a nuclear winter happening (although it could just be a regular northern winter). A nuclear winter would clear up within a few years. It would completely wreck the biosphere, but afterward the weather would return to normal.

So, I think they've arrived in the immediate aftermath of the catastrophe. My theory? After the rebel Cylons joined the human fleet, the other Cylons jumped to Earth ahead of them and annihilated our civilization--possibly with the help of the last of the Five.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Ultra Late Adopter: Why I Don't Want an iPhone... But Will Probably Cave Anyway]]> I was recently in the market for my first smartphone. I looked long and hard at the iPhone, and then calmly and deliberately turned my back on it and got a Palm Centro. I am very glad I did.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Watch Vader Meet The Secret Apprentice]]> Well, this looks really damn awesome. Too bad I ain't gonna buy a console for it.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on The Prisoner May Be The One Scifi Show Worth Remaking]]> @aixelsyd: Sorry, but neither of us could figure out what to make of "Fall Out". There was not a single moment in it that made any sense at all. (And we're not "littlebrains".)

About the only way it might work, as far as I can tell, is if the entire series, from beginning to end, takes place in McGoohan's mind, and he is both Number Six and Number One. But that's not clear at all.

Oh, and we thought the missile was really stupid. We both busted out laughing.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Wall Cars Will Race Automagically for Eternity]]> Coolness. They probably don't do so well on carpet, though, so I don't think we'll be doing it anytime soon.

Although I'd love to watch the dog and cat try to deal with this. Hee hee hee...

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Palm Centro On Verizon]]> I got a Centro a couple of months ago and I love it. Yes, the interface is old, but it's reliable. And I'd used Palm devices before, and still had all of my third-party software--most of which works fine on the Centro. (Like, oh, emulators for NES, Atari 2600, and the HP scientific calculators. Do these even exist for the iPhone?)

I looked long and hard at the iPhone, but in the end, I just couldn't justify paying that much for that little. Even with the 3G version--which, with AT&T hiking the price $10/month, turns out to be even more expensive than the first generation.

The Centro costs FAR less than the iPhone and uses the same $50/month Sprint plan I had before, and has a robust third-party software market that isn't in thrall to Apple (or constantly fighting against them). And the keyboard, while small, is fine with my thumbs, and I get fewer errors than with the iPhone's virtual keyboard. And I can edit Office documents on the fly.

About the only thing the Centro doesn't have that I would like is GPS, but I can deal.

Oh, and it can shoot video, which the new iPhone STILL can't do.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on The Prisoner May Be The One Scifi Show Worth Remaking]]> My spouse and I just finished going through the Prisoner DVD set. I actually do think that a remake could work quite well (though not necessarily with Caviezel). Especially if they play on all the tension in our culture now over surveillance and official paranoia.

And, frankly, I'd be happy if they had an ending that made sense. I'd always heard about how bizarre the last episode was, and how people camped out on McGoohan's doorstep demanding explanations that he refused to give. Having seen it now, I completely understand. What the hell was he thinking?

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Welcome to the Future of Broadband: Third Major ISP AT&T Testing Bandwidth Caps in the Fall]]> @Nev-in-NYC:

"providers of an essential service joining together to collaboratively hike the price leaving consumers with no viable alternative." (emphasis added)

I think you've hit the nail on the head there. I smell an antitrust lawsuit.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Why Haven't Alien Intelligences Contacted Us Yet?]]> Personally, I think that intelligent life is common; it's industrial civilization that's rare.

The main reason we've been able to reach the technological level that we have is because of the cheap, convenient energy available from fossil fuels, mainly coal and oil. Much of this exists because of historical accidents, particularly mass extinctions--such as the asteroid impact that killed the dinosaurs.

These are probably fairly common occurrences, but we don't really know how often it will be that an emerging civilization will have such convenient energy sources available to exploit just when it needs them. And, since we're running out of them ourselves, we have no reason to think that they'll last very long where they do exist.

Add to that the fact that much of our technical infrastructure would have been difficult or impossible to build without petroleum (think rubber, plastics, etc.). Also, it's unclear at best whether we'll be able to maintain our current technological level without fossil fuels.

Given all that, it looks like we may have been pretty damn lucky in being able to advance to where we are in the first place, and there's no telling if we can stay here.

Combine that with distance, timing, and all the other uncertainties in the Drake Equation, and I'm not surprised at all that we haven't found anybody. I'm sure they're out there, but we may never be able to talk to them.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Pong Seemed So Exciting Back in the 1970s]]> I started with one of the B&W Pong games, possibly the Sears TelePong. There were many, many imitators though. Went from that to the Atari 2600.

Amazingly, the Pong controllers were better.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on 40 Hours Of Illustrator, Time-Lapsed]]> Well, I personally think this is absolutely amazing. I couldn't take my eyes off of it.

I want a higher-rez video, a print of the final product, and a good MP3 of the soundtrack.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Cylon Deathfest on Battlestar Galactica]]> BTW, am I the only one who's noticed that the Hybrid's "End of line" is a Tron reference?

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on 20 Science Books Every Scifi Fan (and Writer) Should Read]]> I agree with most of these, particularly "Gödel, Escher, Bach".

But for Eris' sake, NOBODY should be made to read Darwin. As important as his ideas were, the man is an absolutely awful writer. "On the Origin of Species" is one of the most boring books ever written. Stick with his popularizers, like Stephen Jay Gould.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Internal Microsoft Vista Video is as Painful as Videos Get]]> Oh sweet screaming Jesus, this is bad.

Microsoft has so much money to hire people with actual talent. So why don't they? Why?

I have to go have an acid bath now. Only way to get the smell off.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Will Steven Spielberg Eviscerate "Ghost in the Shell"?]]> Ew. Spielberg goes cyberpunk? The very idea terrifies me.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Laurie Anderson's Petrochemical Arms]]> I've worshiped Laurie Anderson for over 20 years. Seen her perform three times and planning the fourth. And I have just about everything she's ever released, including the incredibly rare Home of the Brave movie on VHS, plus bootlegs of all her other videos. (She's releasing a DVD box set soon, and you better believe I'll be snapping it up.)

When my spouse and I went out on our first date, one of the first things we discovered about each other was that we both loved her. This was a major bonding issue.

For geeks with an artistic bent, she's an absolute goddess.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Bruce Willis Will Play Robocop -- Sort Of]]> I like this premise a lot. I especially like that the cop will be forced to sympathize with the "techno-terrorist" as he's working to stop him. (Yes, it's an old and predictable plot structure, but in this setting it'll have some great twists.)

And Bruce Willis can be pretty damn good, if he has good material to work with. Done right, this could be a really great movie.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Bruce Willis Will Play Robocop -- Sort Of]]> I like this premise a lot. I especially like that Willis' character will have to learn to understand the "techno-terrorist"'s world view in order to stop him.

And Bruce Willis can be pretty damn good if he has good material to work with. Done right, this could be a really great movie.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on New Ridley Scott Movie Has Better Drugs Than Blade Runner]]> Dear sweet screaming Jesus, this is fantastic news. Brave New World is one of my favorite books of all time, and I've been scared of anybody filming it because I'd be afraid they'd just screw it up (as in that horrible TV movie). But, if we're not allowed to resurrect Kubrick, Scott is probably the best possible choice.

But questions remain. Will they keep the caste system? The endless sex? Who to play Bernard Marx? Lenina Crowne? Mustapha Mond? And--most of all--what about the worship of Henry Ford?

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Neal Stephenson's New Novel Remains Shrouded in Mystery]]> Well, that sounds like a hell of a book. I adored the Baroque Cycle, but I've been looking forward to Neal's return to straight SF. Can't wait to read it.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Apple iPhone SDK Roundup: Everything You Need to Know]]> The one and only thing I care about--currently the reason I'm inclined not to get an iPhone when my current contract expires--is this:

Am I going to be able to shoot video?

Since Apple doesn't give that option by default, somebody else is going to have to do it, if it's possible. Whether or not it's possible will decide whether I get the iPhone.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Tom Paris is F*cking Sarah Silverman]]> Holy crap, that was Sarah Silverman? I actually had a crush on her. Ironic, considering I now find her annoying as hell.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Who Has The Biggest Power Generator In Space?]]> @Jeff-Minor: Accelerando didn't have a Dyson sphere, but a Dyson swarm--a number of small machines in formation. In this case, supercomputing clusters, all tightly networked.

Makes sense in many ways; lots of energy, no problems with heat dissipation. But the latency issues always bugged me. If they're orbiting 1 AU from the Sun, round-trip travel time for a signal is at least 33 minutes. Methinks this would be too much of an annoyance.

I actually asked Stross himself about this, and he didn't seem to think it was a problem. But I know it'd bug me.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on The Explodiest Outer Space Crashes Ever to Rock Your Movie Theater]]> Well, I'm with the people who mentioned Pitch Black, Aliens (though the compositing on that one was a little too obvious), Starship Troopers, and especially Serenity.

And while I haven't seen the Pegasus crash yet--waiting on the DVD--I loved the nuking of Cloud 9. I know it's not a crash, but still.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on PC World examines your options]]> @deathboy: Wow, homophobic slurs against Mac users. It's not easy to mix such different hatreds in the same sentence. I salute your obvious talent.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Indiana Jones And The Really Big Gun]]> @CDE: this takes place in the 1950s. No Nazis. Maybe Soviets?

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Time Traveling Musical About H.G. Wells and Jack The Ripper in 1979 San Francisco]]> So help me, I can actually see this working as a musical. I loved the movie when it first came out, and I saw it again recently. It's a little cheesy but still holds up.

I hate the idea of moving it to New York, though. If you're going to have it anywhere but San Francisco, then why not London? Then you wouldn't have to explain how Wells travels into the future and ends up in a different city. (Which the movie glossed over anyway.)

By the way, laughingacademy, Malcolm McDowell and Mary Steenburgen fell in love for real while they were making the movie, and married shortly afterward. Apparently Meyer didn't figure it out until the movie was done. But it explains a lot about their chemistry!

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Which Scifi Franchise Cries Out For A Re-Imagining?]]> Logan's Run. Definitely. Especially if they make it worldwide, like it was in the book.

And, while my fellow Blue Blaze Irregulars will lynch me, I wouldn't mind seeing a big-budget Buckaroo Banzai remake. I'd much rather have the promised sequel, though.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Geek to Live: Have a say in what Google says about you]]> I'm late finding this post, but oh well. I'm actually going a bit farther than everybody else; I'm changing my legal name to match my online handle.

About a year ago, I got tired of coming up with nicknames to use online, and I'd been wanting to change my last name for most of my life, so I decided to start using my spouse's name, Eisley. I use the name everywhere online now, and I'm making plans to change it legally this year--and it looks like I'll be the only one.

I've owned brianeisley.com for a while now, and it goes to my LiveJournal blog (which has links to all my profiles). But I'm planning to buy hosting for it when I make the legal change, and I'll set up a nameplate at that time.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on Star Trek Trailer Will Hurt Your Head]]> Insert "boldly going where far too many have gone before" joke here.

Seriously... I've loved Trek since the late seventies, and pretty much stuck with it through all its incarnations (well, until Enterprise). But I honestly couldn't care less about this. It's gotten so damn tired.

Part of me keeps saying, "if they could redo Battlestar Galactica and have it be not only good, but fantastic, then they can redo Trek." But for the most part, I just don't give a damn anymore. I'd much rather have a sequel to Serenity.

But oh well. The new Trek will come out, and it'll probably suck, and they'll try again a few years later, and so on, and so on, until it finally sinks into their collective heads that they need to come up with something NEW. We might even live long enough to see it.

]]>
<![CDATA[brianeisley commented on New Television Series Examines Life Without Humans]]> @lasertagsp and Paperclip Mixmaster: Most skyscrapers have steel frames. They'll eventually deteriorate in one way or another, simply from the weather. Concrete might last a bit longer but will also be taken down by erosion in the end. Either way, once a weak spot develops, the whole structure can become unstable very quickly.

Look at 9/11. All it took was for a bit of the WTC's metal frame to be compromised, and the upper floors began to sink. As soon as that started, it quickly became a runaway collapse. (Assuming you believe the mainstream theory of what happened, which I do.)

]]>