I could not judge that - I have never seen either Crank movies nor have I seen Gamer. I just found the action scene to be way too slow paced and too short. For example, the first action sequence is laughable : GR arrives, gets off his bike, poses for a good minute, then two dudes attacks him, he burn them to bits in 12 seconds. Then the villains scramble for bigger guns, and during that time GR slowly walks, grab one of the goons, and look at him intensely for another good minute, then the goon fries. Then the lead goons fires a grenade launcher. End of action scene. 1 minute of killing, 2 minutes of posing and starring. Repeat for the whole movie.

At least the first movie had the elemental badies, and the chain flailing off in all directions, and the bike climbing a building, etc. This ones just looks bland. #observationdeck

Just came back from Ghost Rider Spirit of Vengeance. Never thought I would utter such words but: the first one was better­.

This one is just boring, the jokes are stupid, and the action scenes are lifeless. #observationdeck

Yeah, would fit Lucas M.O: Say something, and then say the exact opposite ten years later. He's always been doing that.
I could. But do I care enough to do so? Here is the question.

And sorry but, ROBOT LEGS? That's all? He got cut in half! Not just had his leg cut - his whole belly was sliced in two. The damages are way too intensive to be repaired by robot legs.

I'll had this to the list of EU stupidity. Just like the "Anakin is Palpatine's Master force-made dark messiah son" bullshit.

That was a serious question - I was curious, I didn't know this spelling. I was wondering where it came from... :P
OK, I haven't followed Clone Wars, I knew they had DM brother a while back, but isn't Darth Maul, you know, dead?And not only fell into the Sarlaac Pit or something - cut in half and then plunged into a bottomless chasm. So, how come he is back?
Yeah, I am pretty sure the guy on the cover art is not God (write do you write Yahweh like that?). He just look a hell of a lot like him. Just like the Arabic guy is probably not Aladdin - I was using stock characters to get across the meaning of awesomeness.
Okay, that is the actual covert art of the book? If yes, I'm totally buying this book only for the art. It's gorgeous. And come on, Aladdin, a cat-lady and the Judeo-Christian God on the same cover? That"s the definition of AWESOME.
There is a porn comic that actually used that joke. At least, that's what a friend of told me. Whistle...
That's weird, this worked for me. But now it doesn't. But your work. Weird

And yeah I'm in canada too

Fun fact: Those tigers lives in Northen climate. So yes, they do play in the snow. You wanna see a tiger playing in the snow? Of of the rotating picture on this website home page can fulfill your wish!

[www.zoosauvage.org]

Having seen only LotR in theater, I don't remember noticing the difference between this one and all the others movies I've seen in theater since, except for The Artist, which was 4:3 (and that was noticeable.) #tips
They mention the armor as being ornemental. So yeah, it's probably just for show in the final battle of the season. It's not in the book, but it fits with Cersei's character, who has very strong penis envy.
Yeah, I knew the 4:3, and the 16:9. I didn't know the others. But does it really creates a noticeable difference if a movie is 2.35:1 or 1.85:1? Is it a difference I will see while watching the movie, or only if you put the two side-by-side? #tips
IMDB is fan-edited though, so every thing on here must be taken we a grain of salt when it comes to upcoming movies.

However, I don't get what is the problem here - what is all those numbers you are talking about? Screen resolution or something? What do they change? I'm a huge movie fan, but the technical aspect is really not my thing.

Oh, I agree, watching someone play a videogame is one of the most boring activity one can do. This is how I felt when watching Sucker Punch. Like I was watching someone play a video game.

But I didn't get that impression at all from Battle L.A. #observationdeck

Cersei has a set of ornamental and elegant, ‘Valkyrie-like' armour.

Why would Cersei have an armour? I mean, yeah Cersei would be happy to have an armour like the men, but I don't remember her ever being mentioned at having one, even if its ornamental, in the books. Is it mentioned in the books I haven't read yet, 4 and 5?

@ Ruthless

As Doom said on the article's comment, Doom never had a skin armor. This was the actions of a sabotaged Doombot. Rest assured that this Doombot and the cockroach responsible for its sabotage have both been chastized with extreme prejudice. No one concludes deal in Doom's name. Only Doom is mighty enough to speak for Doom.

It's not THAT disgusting, after all it's the miracle of life, but it makes my scalp itch, like every time I see or read or hear about something bug-related.
We Come from the Future
More Stories…