@Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★: My mom spend half an hour in a parking lot listening to that and waiting for me to get interviewed. Sadly, that did not occur - I didn't even see the Science Friday people among the wandering press.
@Im a people person. Who drinks.: I gotta call 'em like I see 'em! Maybe that should be a "side series" - questions plus the occasional biogeek buzzkill.
Nipping the impossible in the bud will make the awesome yet possible more likely in the future if it can help others avoid dead ends.
@Klebert L. Hall: I considered discussing the "pure energy" thing as part of a "Evolution doesn't have an End Boss" future, but that may deserve a column of its own.
@YatesRichards: I'll admit to playing fast and loose with silicon-based and in silico, but I'm not sure we can say quite so easily that we're merely life running on carbon-based hardware. You could run a simulation of carbon-based life on silicon, or - perhaps in the future - you could run a simulation of AI in carbon. How close those simulations would be to the original is an open question (and always will be, at least in the philosophy department).
@cyr3n: Back when I was in training, we tried all sorts of loopy things to achieve the proper stretch - I'd be all for it. Sure to be a market in physical therapy, too.
@bjarmson: Perhaps I'm cynical, but I've always thought Wash died because the ensemble cast of Firefly was too large for a series of movies, and of all the roles on the ship that River could have grown into as a replacement, pilot made the most sense.
@Brutalitarian: I hadn't thought of silicon and sulfur - hmm. I'll have to ponder that. My sulfur chemistry begins and ends with disulfide protein bonds.