There's a reason Marx talked about the "opium of the people" - he used the stuff himself. As I explained, distributing everything evenly with regard to need, but without regard to effort (pure socialism) results in no one desiring to work. Having "unlimited goods" removes the survival imperative from work (food, clothing, healthcare, education to the limits of one's abilities), but requiring work for "luxuries" (entertainment) and prestige will keep people working for other reasons; the prestige of designing something new, unique and desirable will keep people wanting to work for the rewards.
The other thing that needs to be realized is that having a design and a way to make it won't completely eliminate costs - there are still raw materials, the upkeep of the Makerbot, and the power needs of the machine to be taken into account. Designing and making your own products merely removes the overhead - recoupment of the manufacturer's design costs, marketing, and product placement, among others. (If you have a design, you can make 1, 10 or 100 pairs of Nike Air Jordans without paying for the Nike "brand," or Michael Jordan's cut for the use of his name).
Eight Legged Freaks
The Prophecy
any and all Shannon Doherty films...
Independence Day ended with a decisive blow against the aliens, but left out the boring aftermath: The medium-sized motherships were hovering over major cities, such as Washington DC (the iconic blast over the White House), Cairo, Paris...after the loss of the huge mothership, they would have likely fallen into the cities, causing massive death and destruction, on top of the aliens' already massive death toll.
The 2009 Star Trek movie takes place in an alternate future nearly 100 years before TNG (the first episode of TNG takes place approximately 80 years after the original series ended; that was three years into Kirk's original 5-year mission, and the alternate Kirk is at least 8-10 years younger than that Kirk). Any weather-control satellites or technology would not be as advanced as TNG tech.