The fact is that human exploration of Mars (assuming that's what you mean by the "Mars Exploration project") is a relatively long-term goal, well beyond the planning horizon of the next administration. There are much bigger near-term space policy issues that require the attention of the next president.
You'll find several mentions of Mars - if that's your thing - like this: "He [Obama] endorses the goal of sending human missions to the Moon by 2020, as a precursor in an orderly progression to missions to more distant destinations, including Mars." if Mars isn't your thing, read the policy anyway: it's incredibly detailed for a niche topic like space, with lots of attention paid to boring-but-important issues like ITAR reform and commercialization.
Second: I'd encourage readers here to read the second [www.thespacereview.com] and third [www.thespacereview.com] parts of his essay, which includes some information on what advocacy groups are doing (or not doing, as the case may be) on this subject, and links to some additional online resources.
You're probably thinking of Mars Science Laboratory, scheduled for launch in 2009 [mars.jpl.nasa.gov] . Phoenix, as others have noted, is a static lander. MSL *is* badass, at least for rovers...