TL:DR: In order to get this job, you have to already have been doing this job for money somewhere else? I get it, but starting off then sounds impossible.
I'll enjoy these works and let them fill in blanks, and like Star Wars, allow the canon/non-canon works to thrill, titillate, and annoy. Somewhere there's many an Expanded Universe with an Admiral Thrawn, and I've been told to visit it. Maybe I will, maybe I won't, but it's there and it affects my enjoyment of the originals not one wit. It is sauce, and if anything has been proven about human nature, where there is cooking there is probably someone asking for ketchup.
1. I believe that quality is quality no matter the medium, but all I saw in Manga on store shelves was increasingly dreck. When the Simpsons came out, a lot of networks tried their hand to ride that wave. With the exception of the Critic, who else had the quality? Proliferation doesn't equate to quality.
2. Like comic books, I came to love graphic novels and compilations more. I never had the patience to wait 2 years to finish a storyline.
3. Age gets in the way. There was a time where hanging out in a Borders with a cute girl in a videogame shirt, reading everything, and watching her half speak in mangled Japanese becomes a bit tiresome (particularly when that becomes the extent of her personality). That's a young man's game, and I don't play it anymore.
4. Three anime's were incredibly popular when I started watching and reading more Japanese stories... Evangelion, Perfect Tennis, and Sailor Moon. Of those three, only two story types seem prevalent anymore, and it ain't giant god-robots....
I do hate me some market-speak (I don't think it works anymore), so this guy is already irritating me.
On a funny note, he looks like Tim Cook played by the villain from the recent Casino Royale. You'll never unsee it now...
- If you listen to music at the highest possible file quality, a pair of Grados or another pair of moderate-insane monitors will make them come alive with detail and nuance, particularly if you favor more classical and more traditional (albeit complex) rock groups.
- The Beats have a dull sound for the first couple price points, punctuated by hard hitting bass. For going to the gym and having a sense of style that fits well in the Apple ethos (pay for the quality, but also a good dose of brand recognition and pretty).
- The Beats monitors, on the other hand, are absolutely nice for lossless, jazz, classical, as long as you like your low end deep as the abyss. The absolute best I've heard Etta James' "At Last" (RIP) was through a pair of the $400 Beats, and for people of a certain income, more power to them.
- For me, I prefer something cheaper that is bass heavier but still manages to be forgiving to crappy mp3's and free streaming services with a decent amount of detail and, importantly, a good sense of high volume, the Klipsch Ones.
Personally, I say kudos to Monster and their now-defunct deal with Beats. It is less crappy than most other headphones sold mainstream, they don't look like ass, they work for most people. People fault Monster's marketing, but they never fault Grados or other brands for failing to set the world on fire.
This is not a tailgate TV, which I think there's definitely a market for.
This product has the feel of a well done maneuver. I may strongly dislike Monster, but hat's off to this one.
Cruising the internet for deals, actually, seems to feed my more banal instincts for savings over quality, and as a futurist and techie I lament that trade off of price over quality. If the models are the same, then the choice becomes more fluid. My experience is that I'm charmed more easily by the prospect of deals online, at the expense of quality. Good enough becomes the "right price" and as a futurist if the matter is price then we can assign superlatives like "old tech" or the more romantic "established". If it's the future we're after, or if finicky is the name of the game, there will eventually be a price. If it's on sale, odds are it has lost the superlative "new". So, as late adopters, are we in fact disinclined to new?
Tonight when she gets home from work, I shall risk telling her she was right.
Just because you can, Roku, doesn't mean you should. MHL, lack of ethernet... easier is better than smaller.
It's sad because it really is a piece of shit, and there are better toys out there for the young ones, like some goddamn books or a Super Soaker. The games are as mindless (or arguably worse) than the stuff they'd find on more mainstream systems or with PC software. But it's an iPad for kids, so naturally everyone's gone insane.
The bigger issue, and the one I think we as nerds have a harder time grasping, is the concept of good enough. XP is good enough to keep an old machine online to look at email, youtube, and good ol fashioned internet porn. As long as those work and they can type up a document, they have no impetus to switch.
Security, stability, multimedia, even accessibility... these are words to millions of consumers mean little to next to nothing as long as they can continue with business as usual. As sad as that may sound, I remember a time when removing Bonsai Buddy was a "thing" we nerds had to do for older relatives and neighbors because the words I listed were trumped by the concept a cute funny butler monkey on your screen.