You're very quick to jump to the conclusions that people want murder virtual children on pure principle and "nerdy fanboys" want to ruin someone else's "artistic expression".

You're delusional. Stop being a cunt.
I'm going to shout that brat in Whiterun off a balcony. I don't see the harm in hurting cartoonishly evil children in hilarious, cartoonish ways.
You guys are putting way too much thought into this. Just remember that the "scoring" system that you're talking about can be completely subjective and kind of arbitrary sometimes. This isn't grade school.

The 0-10 scale is not universal and can be just about anything. On Giantbomb's scale it means how much the reviewer recommends the game. There is no weirdo objectivity in it. On the Likert scale it's completely different. Hell, on the Anwar scale, 1 means beautiful, 10 means fuck-ugly.

So please, stop saying a saying a "perfect" score on some random scale equals a "perfect" game.
You had to read one paragraph comparing Skyward Sword to its predecessor in completely relevant ways. What a fucking nightmare.
I spent an entire round crashing jets and helicopter into tanks. Anyone who doesn't find that fun needs to look for more "serious" servers.
Click on any news story about a Bioware game and you will find him bitching about it in the comments. It is quite amusing.
I think it lingered on this shot half a second too long.
Hardly anyone actually spawns on the carrier after the first minute of the game. They'll either spawn directly in a jet or below deck, by a boat.
He guest starred on the Vampire Diaries for like 3 episodes. They may as well use his Pearl Harbor credit.
According to the books, blonde hair is a rare, recessive trait. However, it's still weird when you notice it.
I think that's for the best. Same lore, better art style.
She's kind of like Wil Wheaton. Just a decent actress, but a giant fucking nerd. She does enough work to keep herself relevant. Also, this:
Well no. 3/10 means.. 3/10. It's already on scale, it's 3 over 10. It's just like 30/100, or 300/1000.

Those numbers don't mean shit without proper context. This isn't fucking grade school. 30% doesn't always equal fail.
You realize that score is entirely subjective right? Not to mention "3/10" can mean something entirely different depending on the scale.

Games aren't math problems (unless you're a technical wizard or an audiophile).
Evil because one dumb reviewer can screw years of developer's work with his 10 minutes piece, dumb because you really need to ignore everything about game development to not appreciate efforts like Dead Island. I can undestand a 6 if you really hate the game, 3/10 is just unprofessional

That has to be the silliest thing I've heard all day. Game journalists should impugn themselves just to avoid hurting someone else? Fuck that.
Not every uses the same scale for scoring games. Here's Eurogamer's scale: [www.eurogamer.net]

Regardless, their website consists of many journalists, which of course means many different tastes and opinions. Unless you can sift through their reviews and recognize some kind of pattern, I think your "ass sniffing" theory might be a little off base.
That man is putting too much thought into a dumb points system.
The real trolls are the ones whose knees jerked so hard they spilled Mountain Dew all over their keyboards

I'm not sure if you're a troll, but you're certainty a cunt.
Alpha Protocol is what happens when a game's shooting relies on stats.
the innovative but flawed ME1 system

You mean their first poor attempt at making a shooter? ME1 had rudimentary squad mechanics AND shitty shooting.
We Come from the Future
More Stories…