Contributors:
Lisa Katayama | Email
Geoff Manaugh | Email
Lynn Peril | Email
Michael Reilly | Email
Terry Johnson | Email
Ann & Jeff VanderMeer | Email
Ed Grabianowski | Email
"I agree that most, if not all of these were better off on paper, but I disagree with the statement that they "should never have been committed to celluloid"."
"@Garrison Dean: Maybe because the first electronic computers didn't exist 'till the 30s and the first general purpose, re-programmable computer wasn't built 'till the 40s?"
"Alright, this is a bit of a deviation from the movie focus of this discussion, but I just finished reading Variable Star by Robert A Heinlein and Spider Robinson."
salamander42 commented on Five Ways Reality Went Sci-Fi So Far This Century
http://io9.com/5027077/salamander42 commented on 10 Books That Were Better Off on Paper
http://io9.com/5020563/salamander42 commented on 10 Books That Were Better Off on Paper
http://io9.com/5020563/salamander42 commented on Antarctica Is Shrinking Before Your Eyes
http://io9.com/5016958/salamander42 commented on The Cutest Science Fiction Sidekicks, And Why They Fail
http://io9.com/386796/salamander42 commented on A Machine That Types What Is Spoken To It, 1913
http://io9.com/377431/salamander42 commented on Riverside Views in a Thriving Halo World
http://io9.com/373272/salamander42 commented on What Novels Span The Most Aeons?
http://io9.com/372183/salamander42 commented on Should Movies Update Classic Scifi, Or Go Retro?
http://io9.com/368987/salamander42 commented on Eiffel Tower's Massive New Observation Deck to be Made of Kevlar Webbing
http://io9.com/369515/