<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan's Posts]]></title>
		
		<link>http://io9.com</link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
				        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ American Vampire's Snyder Introduces Our Secret Toothy Cousins [Exclusive] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/av_top.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />A couple of weeks ago, <a href="http://io9.com/5390147/the-future-of-vampires-is-amercian">we told you about <em>American Vampire</em></a>, next year's Vertigo series about the newest breed of bloodsuckers. We talked to the series creator <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #scottsnyder" href="http://io9.com/tag/scottsnyder/">Scott Snyder</a> about what to expect &mdash; and how <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #stephenking" href="http://io9.com/tag/stephenking/">Stephen King</a> got involved.</p> <p><strong>So what is <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #americanvampire" href="http://io9.com/tag/americanvampire/">American Vampire</a></em>?</strong></p> <p>The series follows, and is focused on, the concept of vampire geneology and vampire evolution. It reimagines vampires as these creatures that have evolved as the bloodlines hit different populations at different times, so there's different species of vampires, like there are different breeds of dogs. So there's this whole hidden history, this whole secret family tree. But the thing that it's about specifically is, there hasn't been a new breed of vampire in a couple of hundred years for reasons that are part of the fun mystery of the first couple of [story cycles]. There's only this one dominant species, and it's the one that's the classic, Euro-centric, nocturnal, stake through the heart... You know, the vampire that, when I conceived of the series, we were all a little sick of. The star of the series is the bloodline, this new breed of vampirism. The forward-moving part of the series, the part that's most exciting for us is, we have new characters with each cycle, with big parts played by favorite characters from the past, but we'll also be revealing parts of the secret history and how the world of vampires came to be the way it is. And also, the brewing tension between all the breeds of vampires that exist now.</p> <p>So there's a big, behind the curtain, story that we're working on as well [as the individual story arcs].</p> <p><strong>So how did it get started? Did you pitch it to Vertigo?</strong></p> <p>I came up with it as a concept a few years ago, actually - I don't know how interesting this is, it's kind of a boring story, but I was in one of those model shops, like Warhammer shops, down in the West Village and I saw one of those figurines, and it was a zombie confederate soldier. I just started thinking about how, in so much vampire material at the time - and this was before Twilight, more around the Queen of the Damned time - vampires were always nocturnal and aristocratic and elegant and it just seemed so out of place, and out of touch with any straight-up American iconography that I could come up with, or my favorite genres, like westerns or 50s sci-fi and all that kind of stuff. I was like, how come we never see vampires in these kind of places?</p> <p>I started to develop the idea back then, and I thought about doing it as a series of stories, I thought about doing it as a book, and at one point I was going to do it as a screenplay with a friend. But basically, I started doing some comic work on the side about a year ago, and I got the chance to pitch it to Vertigo last summer when an editor at Vertigo called Mark Doyle, who's since become one of my closest friends, read one of my stories in an anthology of literary writers coming up with new superheroes. He actually approached me at a reading for the book and asked if I was a serious comic fan, or just moonlighting for the purposes of the story. I told him I was, I'd always been, and I feel like he gave me a pop quiz; he was all, Well, what're you reading right now? And at the time, it was <em>Final Crisis</em> and <em>Secret Invasion</em> and everything like that. I think he was convinced, and he asked me if I wanted to pitch something. So I went there and I think he sort of expected me to pitch something more literary, but I was like, Hey, what about this vampire thing?<br> <a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/av_skinner.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/500x_av_skinner.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I'd been thinking about doing it as a comic for awhile, and thinking about approaching people who do more horror comics, like IDW or whatever, and then this came along and he really flipped over it. Once we got it on the table, it went pretty fast through development there. It was pretty much greenlit when they asked if there was anyone that I knew who from the writing world who might be interested in giving it a quote or a blurb. I knew Stephen King from before, so I asked him if he would be willing to do it. He read the pitch and decided that he really liked it and said, I'll do you one better. If you want, at some point, I'll write an issue for you. It's pretty funny; I called Vertigo on, I think it was a Friday afternoon, and left a message saying that Steve was interested - By the way, he makes you call him Steve, I don't want to sound like an asshole going "Steve, Steve" - I left a message on Friday afternoon pretty much when the office was already closed saying that he was serious about wanting to do an issue, and it was Monday morning, 9 in the morning, I get a call and everyone was there, and they're all "Did you say <em>Stephen King</em> was interested in doing an issue...?" [laughs]</p> <p>Once he was involved we wanted to [work out how best for him to write an issue or two]. The characters were all developed, I had the seasons mapped out from the pitch. Steve wanted to write this character, who was planned for the second cycle, but Mark and I came up with the idea of doing it like an eight-page, or a teaser, at the end of each issue, to show a glimpse of Skinner, who's the first American vampire. He started writing it, and then he wrote me an email two weeks into it and asked if I'd mind if he went off the reservation a little bit. I was, like, go ahead, do whatever you want. He wound up writing five episodes of sixteen pages, doing so much better than I could've ever done. It really does raise the bar for the series, and he introduced so many big ideas about what the American West means to us, and all these questions about fact and fiction and legend versus history, and all this stuff that really enriches it. Not to mention, he just makes it really scary and vicious.</p> <p><strong>How did Rafael [Albuquerque, series artist] come aboard? His preview art is beautiful.</strong></p> <p>Oh my God. I promise you, this guy is incredible. He came in and did some sketches to see if he got the characters, based on the scripts, because the scripts were done, and he just nailed it immediately. It was, that's our guy. The funny thing is, some of the promo art, the sketches of Pearl...? That's from his audition, those're some of his first sketches. That was the first thing I saw from him, and I thought, that's my character. That's exactly her. She's a little bookish, independent, a little quirky. He's been such a creative force on the series, he brings so much to it.<br> <a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/av_pearlsketches.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/500x_av_pearlsketches.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Rafael, when he read the scripts, was like, Why don't I do the different cycles in different styles? So he would up doing Steve's cycle - which is the origin story of Skinner, who's the first of the new American vampire species, born of this random mutation - in these beautiful washes, so it has this painted, antique quality to it, as well as a creepiness. And for mine - which takes place in the 1920s and picks up on the second American vampire, the first person Skinner turns, who's this young girl and a struggling actress in the silent film industry - he did it in this precise inked, art deco style. I can't reiterate enough how amazing he has been on the book. He's enhanced it, he's been a total superhero himself on it.</p> <p><strong>It sounds like this a really big story.</strong></p> <p>I'm so excited for the places we're going to go. We're already mapped out through the first twelve issues. The next cycle is already page broken, after these first five issues, and after that, the next cycle is pretty much thought out. And after that, I know what decade it's taking place in. It's fun with all of the press it's getting, the fun of introducing [the concept]. There's something sexy about an American vampire, because "It's American!" [laughs]. It's an interesting time to be American. Part of the series is about investigating what's horrific about the American character, and what's heroic about it, and the difference of that in different periods. But we're really way ahead of the game in terms of giving ourselves time to do eight or nine drafts of the scripts, because, believe me, no-one is more aware of a potential vampire backlash or the pressure once Steve is not on the series. We believe in it a lot.</p> <p><strong>American Vampire seems to be more than just a title, it's a statement of the book's intent, the American versus European...</strong></p> <p>Well, it's a fun hook, and there's a kind of, I guess, patriotic thrill in introducing a vampire that's supposed to be American and is stronger and more vicious and so on, but the story isn't about cultural stereotypes. The idea is that the bloodline mutates randomly at various times, and some of the characteristics of the person are adapted into that vampire. So it's the characteristics of a person, of Skinner, rather than a nationality, because otherwise you get into the specifics of, what makes us African-American, what makes us... It's person-to-person. Every once in awhile the bloodline will jump, not with every new person it hits, but every once in awhile, the blood will make something new with someone.</p> <p>We're trying to keep it geneological, but the vampiric qualities have an American characteristic, because it comes from the character of Skinner and he is a character that's iconographic to the [Old] West, where he's this vicious snakelike outlaw. He has this desert quality, but they're based on him, based on a broad cultural assessment on what makes us American.</p> <p>But what we <em>are</em> starting to do is explore the idea of American identity through the different time periods. With the first issues, it's a little tough, just because of the format, sixteen pages of story for Steve and sixteen for me, so there's a tightness to it that works really well for the way they double as stories. But there's more breathing room, I think, for exploring the decades once we get past the first cycle.</p> <p><strong>Pearl seems as iconic in her own way as Skinner.</strong></p> <p>I can promise you that the way they come across on the page, they're not someone you've seen before. Skinner is not The Man With No Name, in the same way that Pearl is very much her own character while keeping that quality of the "20s Girl." She's someone who's more fish out of water, she's a lot more bookish and isn't caught up in the glamour. She loves acting for her own reasons, and a lot of it comes from her upbringing. We try to flesh the characters out so that they're more than just their iconographic selves, especially these two. Pearl and Skinner are two opposing forces early on the series. Skinner is anarchy and violence and fun, and has the opinion that what makes us American is what keeps the west wild, and that we should be wild, and the taming of the west he sees as a feminization, an imposition on the American character. You can imagine how that works itself out in different time periods, where there's prohibition, or the construction of Las Vegas.</p> <p>Pearl, on the other hand, is ethical and struggling to be someone who carries the best qualities of what we would think as American. She has a more hopeful and optimistic belief.</p> <p><strong>Is this going to be a series where there's a lot of jumping around in time periods, as opposed to telling the story chronologically?</strong></p> <p>Yeah, each one is going to approach a different decade, at least at first. Each story will pick up in a different decade but the same bloodline in surprising ways, so there will be some chronological jumping.</p> <p><strong>Are you watching <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #trueblood" href="http://io9.com/tag/trueblood/">True Blood</a></em>, reading or watching the <em>Twilight</em>s?</strong></p> <p>I'm a huge fan of <em>True Blood</em>. Some things I've not caught up with... I read the first <em>Twilight</em> - my wife has actually read all of them - but my feeling is, each one of them brings something different to vampire lore. I've never seen vampires as teen heartthrobs the way that Twilight does it, or the reimagining of vampires as a sociological underclass and the Southern Gothic elements of True Blood make that really fresh. For us, we're trying to bring something new to the table too. <em>American Vampire</em> wasn't conceived as the tale end of a trend. It definitely, for me, predated both of those, so I'm hoping that - When each one of those came out, we were all, Oh, it's just part of the trend, but the better stuff comes out in the crashing of a wave and you're like, That's awesome! We're hoping that we have that kind of response.</p> <p>We really have put a lot of sweat and blood into it about making it something different and high quality, so that if there were no other vampire things around, you're look at it in the same way. I was thinking about it, but other than <em>Bram Stoker's Dracula</em>, I haven't seen a vampire comic since the peak of <em>30 Days of Night</em>. For us, it's great not to be on TV with <em>Vampire Diaries</em> or <em>True Blood</em>, and we're not a movie, so hopefully it'll stand apart as a good read.<br> <a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/av_pearlcover.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/500x_av_pearlcover.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><em>American Vampire</em> debuts in March from Vertigo.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5401613/american-vampires-snyder-introduces-our-secret-toothy-cousins]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5401613]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Exclusive ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[American vampire]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Comics]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Horror]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Overmind]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Scott snyder]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Stephen King]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[True Blood]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[twilight]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Vampires]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Vertigo]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:30:00 -0800]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5401613&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ What If Moviemakers Swapped Franchises? [Franchise-go-round] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/directorswap.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/500x_directorswap.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The problem with big movie franchises is that you always know what to expect; it's always the same guys making the same movies. But what if you swapped creators and movie franchises around? Here's what'd work - and what wouldn't.</p> <p><br clear="all"> <strong>Bay, Kurtzman and Orci's Batman</strong><br> <em>Pros:</em> You'd get a new Batman movie every two years, even if <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #michaelbay" href="http://io9.com/tag/michaelbay/">Michael Bay</a> would complain and tell people that he didn't want to make it but the studio offered him so much money he couldn't say no. Plus, with Bay attached, you know that they'd get to Catwoman as soon as humanly possible instead of this whole "I am a nihilist Joker" crap from <em>The Dark Knight</em>.<br> <em>Cons:</em> Kurtzman and Orci would probably take their Daddy issues (<em>Fringe</em>'s Walter/Peter complicated relationship, <em>Star Trek</em>'s Kirk trying to live up to his dead father's memory by self-destructing but then coming through as the hero he was destined to be, even <em>Transformers</em>' Optimus as Tough-But-Fair Robot Daddy to Shia's Sam Whitwicky) to pop culture's most parent-obsessed character, leading to the risk of a third act emotional breakthrough where Batman cries. There are enough Batman characters to make <em>Revenge Of The Fallen</em> seem understaffed, and the various personality tics of said Batman characters could lead to more unfunny schtick like the Twins and/or Jazz from the <em>Transformers</em> movies. Michael Bay possibly already sees himself as Bruce Wayne. Also, there's every possibility that the movie would make no sense whatsoever (See: <em>Transformers</em>, <em>Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen</em>).</p> <p><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jjabrams" href="http://io9.com/tag/jjabrams/">JJ Abrams</a>' Terminator</strong><br> <em>Pros:</em> Abrams' sense of kinetic, fun filmmaking is just what the franchise needs after <em>Terminator Salvation</em> - He's a sci-fi nerd who knows how to make successful popcorn movies full of tech that are really all about people; in other words, he's a younger James Cameron, before Cameron fell more in love with the tech involved in making movies. A Terminator-ized "Bad Robot" logo would be <em>awesome</em>. There'd probably be a Simon Pegg cameo.<br> <em>Cons:</em> Abrams' inability to not have a happy ending would mean that Skynet would be completely defeated by the time he was done, whether it was a movie or trilogy. The time travel core concept would allow him to reboot the series whenever he wanted, with Zachary Quinto as Arnold Schwarzenegger as the Terminator. There'd probably be a Keri Russell cameo. Actually, fuck the cons. I really want to see Abrams do <em>Terminator</em>, the more I think about it.</p> <p><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #christophernolan" href="http://io9.com/tag/christophernolan/">Christopher Nolan</a>'s <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #gijoe" href="http://io9.com/tag/gijoe/">GI Joe</a></strong><br> <em>Pros:</em> If anyone could give <em>GI Joe</em> some critical credibility, it's Christopher Nolan.<br> <em>Cons:</em> Nolan's attempt would probably be called <em>A Real American Hero</em> and would likely be three hours long, most of which would be spent filled with actors who should know better (Yes, Gary Oldman, we're looking at you) telling the audience how difficult it is to be a real American hero in a morally ambiguous world. There would be at least one subplot about abuse of military power to underscore the moral ambiguity until we move into the third act when the audience needs to get pumped and then Duke would abuse military power to stop the bad guy and then walk away in disgust in order to make a point that will be lost on the majority of an audience who were excited to see shit blow up finally. Cobra Commander would be so compelling that you'll start to wonder if he's wandered on set from a different, better, movie. Purists would complain about Snake Eyes' closing monologue about how difficult it is to be a ninja in the US military. No child would ever want to buy a <em>GI Joe</em> toy ever again.</p> <p><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bryansinger" href="http://io9.com/tag/bryansinger/">Bryan Singer</a>'s Transformers</strong><br> <em>Pros:</em> Singer's mix of geek cred and understanding of human drama/cheap angst is exactly what the Robots in Disguise need. His <em>X-Men</em> movies show that he can deal with large casts, and also keep the core of the original concepts and characters without getting weighed down by nostalgia. His <em>Superman Returns</em> shows that he, uh... knows Kevin Spacey, who could probably do a good Megatron voice? Okay, maybe not that last one.<br> <em>Cons:</em> Tom Cruise would end up playing Optimus Prime, and Ian McKellen would cameo as the Matrix of Leadership/Allspark/Creation Matrix/whatever the hell it's called these days. Singer would leave before the last film in the trilogy to go and make a <em>Go-Bots</em> movie about Leader-1 really being Jesus and stalking his ex-girlfriend.</p> <p><strong>McG's Dollhouse</strong><br> <em>Pros:</em> Revamping Joss Whedon's television series into a stand-alone movie, McG would give interviews about really getting to the heart of the darkness at the center of the concept but then present a movie that's a series of comedic vignettes wherein Eliza Dushku, Lucy Liu and Ellen Page are sassy, independent girls who have to roleplay different personalities and lives while working undercover for D.O.L.L.house, a secret spy organization that pretends to brainwash people and rent them out to clients - with hilarious consequences!<br> <em>Cons:</em> Revamping Joss Whedon's television series into a stand-alone movie, McG would give interviews about really getting to the heart of the darkness at the center of the concept but then present a movie that's a series of comedic vignettes wherein Eliza Dushku, Lucy Liu and Ellen Page are sassy, independent girls who have to roleplay different personalities and lives while working undercover for D.O.L.L.house, a secret spy organization that pretends to brainwash people and rent them out to clients - with hilarious consequences!</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5396278/what-if-moviemakers-swapped-franchises]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5396278]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Franchise-go-round ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Batman]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Bryan Singer]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[christopher nolan]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Dollhouse]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[gi joe]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Jj Abrams]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Mcg]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Michael Bay]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Overmind]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[terminator]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Transformers]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:30:00 -0800]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396278&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ War Is Less Hell In The Future Of Sgt. Rock [Sgt. Rock] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/sgtrock.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Joel Silver's long-running obsession with making a movie of DC Comics' classic WWII hero <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sgtrock" href="http://io9.com/tag/sgtrock/">Sgt. Rock</a></em> is apparently moving closer to coming true, with a screenwriter and director rumored to be involved... and revamping the character into a science-fiction actioneer?</p> <p>According to Empire Online, <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #iamlegend" href="http://io9.com/tag/iamlegend/">I Am Legend</a></em> director Francis Lawrence and screenwriter Chad St. John are planning to take DC's war veteran into the future with the adaptation, in order to overcome studio nerves about a period setting and racist wartime attitudes. If true, this suggests that not only does Warner Bros. miss the point of the character altogether (<em>Sgt. Rock</em> is a series <em>about a soldier in World War II</em>! The time frame is the entire point!), but also that we have another potential comic-to-movie disaster on our hands. Then again, Lawrence has experience of both, having directed the <em>Hellblazer</em> adaptation <em>Constantine</em>, starring the not-so-British Keanu Reeves.</p> <p><a href="http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=26257">Is Sgt. Rock Finally Happening?</a> [Empire Online]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5401319/war-is-less-hell-in-the-future-of-sgt-rock]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5401319]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Sgt. rock ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Comics]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[constantine]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[i am legend]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[please god no]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:30:00 -0800]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5401319&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Grossman: Failure Of Imagination > Harry Potter [Quote Of The Day] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/thumb160x_harrypotter.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #harrypotter" href="http://io9.com/tag/harrypotter/">Harry Potter</a>'s magic disappeared before the end of his final book, according to fantasy novelist <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #levgrossman" href="http://io9.com/tag/levgrossman/">Lev Grossman</a>, and it's all because of happy endings. Spoilers ahead for those who still haven't read the <em>Deathly Hallows</em>!</p> <p>Grossman explained his disappointment in JK Rowling's choice of future for her boy hero to Newsarama.com:</p> <blockquote> <p>I loved Harry Potter, but that epilogue was such an astounding failure of imagination on Rowling's part! And in a way, it throws the entirety of all seven novels into doubt retroactively.</p> <p>I felt the problem she failed to solve was the question of, "here's a young man who can do magic, who has defeated the enemy of humanity when her was 18 – what's the rest of his life look like?" And the best she can imagine is that he marries his high school sweetheart and puts on a big gut and lives in the suburbs. What a disaster!</p> </blockquote> <p>He went on to say,</p> <blockquote> <p>There has to be some better fate for Harry Potter than what he gets. I think that's something of the message of [Grossman's new book] <em>The Magicians</em> – you're not going to go to Narnia, but there has to be something better than that bourgeois suburban mediocrity that seems like the only alternative.</p> </blockquote> <p>Somewhere, a million <em>Potter</em> fans are sharpening their knives in preparation for revenge.</p> <p><a href="http://www.newsarama.com/comics/091109-lev-grossman-1.html">The MAGIC of Lev Grossman</a> [Newsarama.com]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5400549/grossman-failure-of-imagination--harry-potter]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5400549]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ quote of the day ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Fantasy]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Harry Potter]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[lev grossman]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Magic]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:30:00 -0800]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5400549&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Robot Detectives Battle Superhero Bastards For Your Comics Dollars [Comics We Crave] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/comics1_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/500x_comics1_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Hope you've been saving up your pennies for this week's comic haul: There's an impressive amount of new releases that you'll want to take home and cherish for at least the next seven days. Yes, these are <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #comicswecrave" href="http://io9.com/tag/comicswecrave/">Comics We Crave</a>.</p> <p>Let's start with <em>Electropolis</em>, the new Dark Horse collection of Dean Motter's Retrofuture Deco Noir story (<a href="http://www.darkhorse.com/Books/Previews/16-341?page=0">Preview here</a>). Filled with robot detectives, femme fatales and the power of electricity, it's just one of many off-beat genre books appearing at comic book stores this week.</p> <p>And if <em>Electropolis</em>' pulp fiction is your thing, then maybe the <em>Batman/<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #docsavage" href="http://io9.com/tag/docsavage/">Doc Savage</a> Special</em> (Dark Knight Detective versus Man of Bronze!) will also float your boat, after all. Or maybe <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #skydoll" href="http://io9.com/tag/skydoll/">Sky Doll</a>: Doll Factory</em>, a collection of unseen material from the awesome European strip <em>Sky Doll</em>, will provide your reading material for the next few days.</p> <p>But if you prefer your heroines a little less suggestible than Sky Doll, the first issue of <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #tankgirl" href="http://io9.com/tag/tankgirl/">Tank Girl</a>: Skidmarks</em> is probably more your speed. Unsurprisingly, we'd also point you in the direction of the debut of <em>Locke & Key: Crown of Shadows</em>, but <a href="http://io9.com/5399897/unlock-the-black-door-with-exclusive-locke--key-preview">we're biased</a>.</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/comics2_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/500x_comics2_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br clear="all"></p> <p>Maybe you're looking for something you've already seen in major motion pictures? That's okay; not only is there a preview issue of the new series of <em>Wall-E</em>, but there's also <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #starwars" href="http://io9.com/tag/starwars/">Star Wars</a> Purge: Seconds To Die</em>, which follows a young Darth Vader killing off as many Jedi as possible, post <em>Revenge of The Sith</em>. And that's not all! There's also a paperback collection of DC/Wildstorm's recent <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #thexfiles" href="http://io9.com/tag/thexfiles/">The X-Files</a></em> series.</p> <p>For those who can't get enough of those superheroes, then I'd recommend the first issue of <em>Warren Ellis' Supergod</em>, his latest "What if superheroes were bastards?" series. Or, on the opposite end of the superhero spectrum, the <em>Absolute Justice</em> hardcover, collecting Alex Ross' expansive love letter to the <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #superfriends" href="http://io9.com/tag/superfriends/">Super Friends</a></em> (No, really).</p> <p>In between those two extremes, there's Dynamite's <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #projectsuperpowers" href="http://io9.com/tag/projectsuperpowers/">Project Superpowers</a>: The Black Terror Vol. 1</em> collection, DC's <em>Green Lantern: Agent Orange</em> collection, which leads into the current <em>Blackest Night</em> storyline, <em>Supergirl: Who Is Superwoman?</em> (in which Sterling Gates and Jamil Igle manage to undo years of abuse and make Supergirl a likable, working character again - good job, people) and the <em>Authority: The Lost Year Reader</em> (reprinting Grant Morrison and Gene Ha's two completed issues of their abandoned run, ahead of Keith Giffen and other artists aiming to complete the story in their absence).</p> <p>There's also Marvel's <em>PunisherMax</em> (Yes, one word. It's the new "mature readers" title for the character, and maybe Marvel thinks pushing words together is more adult?), <em>Green Hulk/Red Hulk</em> collection (<em>Heroes</em>' writer Jeph Loeb writes a couple of gamma-irradiated monsters in a couple of adventures), the first issue of <em>Strange</em> (Mark Waid's reboot of the former Doctor Strange, Sorcerer Supreme). And also, there's all manner of <em>X-Men</em> books: the <em>Dark Avengers/X-Men: Utopia</em> collection, as well as collections of <em>Wolverine: Tales of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #weaponx" href="http://io9.com/tag/weaponx/">Weapon X</a></em>, <em>Wolverine Weapon X: Adamantium Men</em> and <em>Wolverine/Gambit</em>. All your Wolverine needs should definitely be met this week, let's face it.</p> <p>If there are any other needs looking unserviced, I'd recommend checking out <a href="http://www.diamondcomics.com/shipping/newreleases.txt">the complete list of books shipping from Diamond Distributors this week</a>, and then remembering that <a href="http://www.comicshoplocator.com/">your local comic book store can be found here</a>. If this week seems overly expensive, don't worry; there's an entire skip week at the end of the year to get some of that money back. Look at it as a loan. Or something.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5400854/robot-detectives-battle-superhero-bastards-for-your-comics-dollars]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5400854]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Comics we crave ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[avengers]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Batman]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Comics]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Doc savage]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Electropolis]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Justice League]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Overmind]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[project superpowers]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[sky doll]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Star Wars]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[super friends]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[supergirl]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[tank girl]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[The authority]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[the x-files]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Wall-E]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Weapon x]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[wolverine]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[X-men]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:00:00 -0800]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5400854&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Does Pam Grier Mean That Smallville's Going To Get Suicidal? [Smallville] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/smallville.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Pam Grier has joined the cast of the CW's <em>Smallville</em>, and if her character is any indication, we can expect to see an increase in the amount of underhanded governmental black-ops... And maybe even a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #suicidesquad" href="http://io9.com/tag/suicidesquad/">Suicide Squad</a>? Spoilers below.</p> <p>Grier will join the long-lived superhero soap later this season for a multi-episode arc playing <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #amandawaller" href="http://io9.com/tag/amandawaller/">Amanda Waller</a>, better known to readers of DC Comics' <em>Suicide Squad</em> and <em>Checkmate</em> as the uber-manipulative schemer behind various US Government agencies that use superhumans as cannon fodder on black-ops missions that just so happen to advance her own agenda. Does this mean that Clark is going to end up drafted into service, or will we see the return of various Kryptonite-powered former villains-of-the-week acting under shady orders?</p> <p>Grier's first appearance in the show will be in the second half of the season's <em>Justice Society</em> two-parter, at the start of next year.</p> <p><a href="http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/11/09/exclusive-smallville-lands-pam-grier/">'Smallville' lands Pam Grier!</a> [Entertainment Weekly]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5400727/does-pam-grier-mean-that-smallvilles-going-to-get-suicidal]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5400727]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ smallville ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Amanda waller]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Comics]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Suicide squad]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:30:00 -0800]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5400727&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Alternate Histories Collide In Onion Nazi Piece [Afternoon Reading] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>Wonder what the you from an alternate timeline watches on television? <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #theonion" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #theonion" href="http://io9.com/tag/theonion/">The Onion</a> explains all with the smart <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/news/alternate_universe_sci_fi_channel">Alternate-Universe Sci-Fi Channel Show Asks What Would Happen If Germany Lost War</a>. Worth it for the <em>Battlestar Gleichschaltung</em> joke alone. [The Onion]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5400436/alternate-histories-collide-in-onion-nazi-piece]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5400436]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Afternoon reading ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Alternate timelines]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[The Onion]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:30:56 -0800]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5400436&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ What Happens When ABC Runs Out Of V? [Steal This Pitch] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/vlost.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/500x_vlost.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The first episode of <em>V</em> was an unabashed hit for ABC, getting 14 million viewers last week... but the network only has three more episodes left before the series' winter break. How can they capitalize on this unexpected hit?</p> <p><em>V</em>'s success last week must feel confusing for the alphabet network; on the one hand, it was the second-highest rated series premiere of the season, and the most-watched 8pm premiere for ABC since <em>Lost</em>, but on the other, they'd already put the show on production hiatus and retooled things behind the scenes in a way that not only means they're unlikely to be able to bring the show back <em>before</em> the announced March 2010 return - thereby potentially losing whatever momentum the show will have at the end of this four episode mini-season - but also means that they've replaced many of the folk responsible for the show's success in the first place (Then again, who knows how many people liked what they saw last week and will return tomorrow?). Ever eager to help television networks out of a jam, we've come up with some possible ways to keep the V-mentum going while viewers wait for more Visitors:</p> <p><strong>Re-Edit Other, Little-Seen, Shows To Tie In With <em>V</em></strong><br> Got any police procedurals lying around? Just add an extra scene at the end where the perp turns out to get a cut on his hand and WTF HE'S A LIZARD MAN. Then you can cut to Elizabeth Mitchell getting a phone call and saying "Another one? Oh my God, they're everywhere." Cue dramatic music and cut to black. Pretend that it's an effort to show just how widespread the alien invasion actually is.</p> <p><strong>Re-Edit Episodes Of The Original <em>V</em></strong><br> Start each episode with Morena Baccarin talking to some minion Visitor and saying "You know, this reminds me of that time we invaded an Earth in a parallel dimension, and I had that long hair and 1980s evil bitch mask" before cutting to the original episode. Then, at the end, cap each episode off with Baccarin laughing and saying "Now, <em>that</em> was a sticky situation!"</p> <p><strong>Run Trailers For <em>Lost</em> Promising That It'll End With The Visitors Arriving On Earth</strong><br> It's not like we have any better idea how <em>Lost</em> is going to end, let's face it. And, let's face it; like you can't already imagine the serious voiceover going "It started with a <em>planecrash</em>... But once they've solved the <em>riddle</em> of the <em>island</em>... They'll have to face the <em>visitors</em>." And then use <em>Party of Five</em> footage of Matthew Fox and Scott Wolf and pretend it's a flashback. Alternately...</p> <p><strong>Run Trailers Reminding People That They Could Just Watch <em>Lost</em> Instead</strong><br> Again, cue the serious voiceover: "Waiting to find out what happens in <em>V</em>? Why? <em>Lost</em> is back on and it's much, much better. We promise that we'll throw Alan Tudyk in if it'll make a difference. Come on! It's the last season!"</p> <p><strong>Just Rename FlashForward</strong><br> Am I the only person who thinks that <em>FlashForward</em> and <em>V</em> are long-lost brother shows? Both of them have worldwide events that shock humanity that are linked to terrorism and some believe prove the existence of God, both have FBI agents as central characters working to uncover the truth about said events, and both feature attractive people from as many different demographics as possible drawn into the web of slowly uncovering storylines. Considering that <em>FlashForward</em>'s ratings are slipping, why not just edit in a new subplot that explains that the FlashForwards are <em>really</em> the result of Visitor experiments, show Dominic Monaghan peeling off his face to show that he's a lizard, and just call the show <em>V</em> from December onwards? Would anyone really care that much?</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5399834/what-happens-when-abc-runs-out-of-v]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5399834]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ steal this pitch ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Abc]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Flashforward]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Overmind]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[V]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:30:45 -0800]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399834&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Abrams On Fringe Cancellation Rumors [Fringe] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/fringe.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />With ratings taking a dramatic tumble last week, is <em>Fringe</em> really in danger of not making it to a third season? J.J. Abrams, one of the show's creators, has addressed the deadly rumors, calling Fox "insanely supportive" of the show.</p> <p>Talking to Entertainment Weekly's Michael Ausiello, Abrams said,</p> <blockquote> <p>The mood on set and in the writer's room is as good as the ratings are bad, which is to say, wonderful. Luckily, Fox has been insanely supportive, for which we are deeply grateful... [G]iven that we're on one of the hardest [nights] on television, we're just focusing on making the best show we possibly can. What else can we do?</p> </blockquote> <p>Here's an idea of how Fox can be more supportive: Move the show to another night, already; the Thursday gambit is clearly not working.</p> <p><a href="http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/11/09/fringe-exclusive-j-j-abrams-on-ratings-and-future/">J.J. Abrams on 'bad' ratings, good vibes, and the show's future</a> [Entertainment Weekly]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5400587/abrams-on-fringe-cancellation-rumors]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5400587]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ fringe ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Jj Abrams]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:30:00 -0800]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5400587&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Earthquakes Never End, Say Scientists [Earthquake] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/earthquake.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The aftershocks of earthquakes can occur decades, and even centuries, after the initial tremors, according to new research carried out by scientists at the University of Missouri. Does this mean that the 1906 earthquake could <em>still</em> destroy San Francisco?</p> <p>According to the UM researchers, this discovery may make sense of previously unexplained earthquakes, such as 2008's Sichuan quake, that registered 7.9 on the Richter scale; the theory is that earthquakes farther from fault lines may be aftershocks of much earlier movements along the fault line, with the further the distance meaning the later the quake:</p> <blockquote> <p>The study, reported in the journal Nature, found that aftershocks near to tectonic boundaries continue for only a few years but further away they can occur over a timescale of decades and centuries. Recent earthquakes in Canada's Saint Lawrence valley, for instance, may be the aftershocks of an earthquake that occurred in 1663.</p> <p>Similarly, a magnitude 7 earthquake that occurred near a town called New Madrid in Mississippi in 1811 is still causing aftershocks that can be felt in the American mid-west because these shocks are the result of movements that are 100 times slower than the movements that occur near to a tectonic fault line.</p> </blockquote> <p>Scientists hope to use this discovery to work out where future earthquakes may occur. <em>Evil</em> scientists hope to use this discovery to annex California and create a base of operations from which they can destroy Superman once and for all.</p> <p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/scientists-unearth-evidence-of-centuriesold-aftershocks-1814689.html">Scientists unearth evidence of centuries-old aftershocks</a> [Independent.co.uk</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5399957/earthquakes-never-end-say-scientists]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5399957]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Earthquake ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[quakes]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Tectonic]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:32:11 -0800]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399957&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Get Lost In The Global Village With This Week's Television [What To Watch] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/340x_watchtowatch2_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />It's a week unlike any other... Oh, okay, with new episodes of most of our favorite shows, it's a week very like many others. But there's also the launch of the new <em>Prisoner</em>, making Sunday <em>the</em> night to tune in.</p> <p><br clear="all"> <strong>Monday</strong></p> <p>What better way to start off the week than with a Syfy marathon of <em>Stargate SG-1</em> running <u>right now</u>, from 8am all the way through to 3pm? Sure, there's that whole "work" thing, but come on. It's <em>Stargate</em>!</p> <p>Otherwise, your television thrills are limited to an 8pm conflict between new episodes of <em>House</em> on Fox (A teenage girl can't distinguish between fact and fiction "after a wild night out." Am I the only one who feels like this could be either awesome or hideously embarrassing for all involved?) and <em>Heroes</em> on NBC, where Sylar is still trying to take control of Matt's body and Claire has to face off with her father's Sorority Girl Army. And, yes, I did accidentally make that sound more interesting than the actual show. Sorry, everyone.<br> <object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rsP4m477Kbg&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rsP4m477Kbg&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/rsP4m477Kbg.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" style="display: none;"/></p> <p><strong>Tuesday</strong></p> <p>For those calling in sick, I'd recommend skipping Syfy's <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #trucalling" href="http://io9.com/tag/trucalling/">Tru Calling</a></em> marathon (8am through 3pm for those whose love of Dushku overpowers their bad-show gag reflex) and tuning into AMC, which goes dragon crazy with a 12:45 airing of <em>Dragonheart</em> (Dennis Quaid and a dragon voiced by Sean Connery!) followed by a 3pm re-run of <em>Reign of Fire</em> (You could stay tuned for a 5pm <em>Batman Begins</em> and 8pm <em>Terminator 2: Judgment Day</em> as well, if you were feeling particularly lazy).</p> <p>If you'd rather get a delayed British take on the 40th anniversary of the moon landing, then <em>James May On The Moon</em> (BBC America at 8pm) takes <em>Top Gear</em>'s Captain Slow and puts him in the driver's seat for an hour long look back at those heady days where men were men and the Moon seemed an obtainable destination.</p> <p>Otherwise, click over to ABC for the second episode of <em>V</em> and see whether it still feels like <em>FlashForward</em> meets... Well, the old <em>V</em>, really (The official PR for the episode says "A seeker among the Visitors tracks Erica and Father Jack. Chad seeks redemption by investigating the aliens ahead of his next newscast while law enforcers press Erica for information concerning Dale M…").</p> <p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_1"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FZAr5sSUMsw&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FZAr5sSUMsw&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/FZAr5sSUMsw.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" style="display: none;"/></p> <p><strong>Wednesday</strong></p> <p>Thank God for <em>Mythbusters</em> on the Discovery Channel at 9pm. Without their investigation into whether cars will automatically burst into flames after crashing (Surely we have empirical proof that the answer is no already?), I'd have to find some way to pretend that <em>Glee</em> (Fox at 9) was a scifi show just to have something to write about for today. I figured I could always claim that it was set in an alternate reality where people aren't creeped out by Will Schuester trying to rap.</p> <p><strong>Thursday</strong><br> If it's Thursday, then it's time for all the shows to run up against each other again. Sure, you could pretend that the networks aren't showing anything and watch a double bill of <em>Demolition Man</em> and <em>End of Days</em> on AMC (Sly and Arnold! In two of their most underrated - for a reason - movies! It starts at 8pm, if you're tempted), after spending the day watching Syfy's <em>Star Trek: Enterprise</em> marathon (8am through 3pm, as ever), but come on. I know that you can't resist the big shows people are talking about.</p> <p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_2"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HUMuTOgJQD0&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HUMuTOgJQD0&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/HUMuTOgJQD0.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" style="display: none;"/><br clear="all"></p> <p>On <em>FlashForward</em> (ABC, 8pm), Aaron discovers the truth about his daughter's death, Janis returns to work and Mark and Olivia's martial troubles bring everyone down yet again, man. Things are much more fun over in Mystic Falls where <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #vampirediaries" href="http://io9.com/tag/vampirediaries/">Vampire Diaries</a></em> (the CW at 8pm) brings a mysterious new teacher, arguments over medallions and, according to the CW, "Damon finally reveals to Stefan the stunning reason he has returned to Mystic Falls." If I watched the show and/or cared, I couldn't wait!</p> <p>9pm brings the real reason to wrestle over the remote; <em>Fringe</em> on Fox gives Olivia, Broyles and Peter a new reason to be suspicious of Massive Dynamic when the impossibly shady corporation turn out to be involved in a kidnapping case, but <em>Supernatural</em> (The CW) looks much more fun than even Walter Bishop could provide:</p> <blockquote> <p>Super fan Becky uses Chuck's phone to trick Sam and Dean into attending a Supernatural fan convention, complete with fans dressed up as Sam and Dean. One of the activities is a live action role-playing game, but things quickly turn sour after a real ghost appears on the scene.</p> </blockquote> <p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_3"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/T7vnybrdkTQ&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/T7vnybrdkTQ&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/T7vnybrdkTQ.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" style="display: none;"/><br clear="all"></p> <p>Seriously. How could anyone resist that?</p> <p><strong>Friday</strong></p> <p><em>Jericho</em> fans! You have the Syfy marathon of the day (8am through 3pm, which I'm sure you already know by now) to keep you happy during the daylight hours; the rest of us will be watching the original <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #thewaroftheworlds" href="http://io9.com/tag/thewaroftheworlds/">The War Of The Worlds</a></em> movie on AMC at 10:15am (And avoiding the following <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #startreknemesis" href="http://io9.com/tag/startreknemesis/">Star Trek: Nemesis</a></em> at 12:15pm, a movie which <a href="http://www.beaucoupkevin.com/blog/improving-the-classics-redux/2009/10/20/">can best be described by blogger Kevin Church here</a>), instead.</p> <p>Still, Friday evening starts the weekend off right with the double bill of <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #batmanthebraveandthebold" href="http://io9.com/tag/batmanthebraveandthebold/">Batman: The Brave and The Bold</a></em> ("The Fate of Equinox!" Yes, the exclamation point is part of the title) and <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #starwarstheclonewars" href="http://io9.com/tag/starwarstheclonewars/">Star Wars: The Clone Wars</a></em> (following last week's surprisingly brutal, "Are Jedi really advocating using flame throwers against living beings what the hell?" episode) on Cartoon Network, starting at 7:30pm (<em>Clone Wars</em> is at 8pm, if you have an aversion of Batman. And if you do, then I'm very, very sorry.)</p> <p>If you're in the mood for MOR dramas teasing the supernatural, then CBS is the place to be tonight, with new episodes of both <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ghostwhisperer" href="http://io9.com/tag/ghostwhisperer/">Ghost Whisperer</a></em> (8pm, with Jennifer Love Hewitt "pulled into a murder mystery by a real estate power couple" - Yes, this is what people want to watch, apparently) and <em>Medium</em> (9pm, which at least includes a potentially amusing-for-the-wrong-reasons subplot about posting videos of someone on the internet and "getting into trouble") on offer.</p> <p>The rest of us, we'll be considering <em>Smallville</em> on the CW at 8pm (It features the Wonder Twins! You know you want to), <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #stargateuniverse" href="http://io9.com/tag/stargateuniverse/">Stargate Universe</a></em> on Syfy at 9pm (The crew of the Destiny get a message from their future selves from the past. Or something) and <em>Sanctuary</em> on the same channel at 10pm.</p> <p><strong>Saturday</strong></p> <p>If you're not looking forward to Syfy's <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #icetwisters" href="http://io9.com/tag/icetwisters/">Ice Twisters</a></em> at 9pm ("A sci-fi novelist is summoned to help scientists after an experiment in weather manipulation goes awry and produces deadly tornadoes made of ice," apparently), then we'd suggest that AMC's double bill of trilogies is the best way to spend your day. Start with the <em>Mad Max</em> trilogy (Movies starting 1:30, 3:30 and 5:30pm) before a night of <em>The Matrix</em> trilogy (The three movies begin at 8pm, 11pm and 1am on Sunday, respectively). Otherwise, the only thing left is Discovery's <em>Surviving 2012</em>... which is about all the prophecies, and not, sadly, advice on making it through Roland Emmerich's latest.</p> <p><strong>Sunday</strong></p> <p>It's the best night of television this week! Who knew, right? Start things off right with Syfy's latest screening of <em>Serenity</em> at 6:30 before switching over midway through - Hopefully missing Alan Tudyk's least favorite scene ever in the process - to catch the premiere of AMC's brand new take on <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #theprisoner" href="http://io9.com/tag/theprisoner/">The Prisoner</a></em> at 8pm. If Ian McKellan and Jim Caviezel can't bring Patrick McGoohan's classic paranoiafest back to life, I'm going to be very depressed.</p> <p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_4"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/s8VZs7aLJCo&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/s8VZs7aLJCo&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/s8VZs7aLJCo.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" style="display: none;"/><br clear="all"></p> <p>Of course, the best way to finish the evening off is coming at midnight, with the latest episode of <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #theventurebros" href="http://io9.com/tag/theventurebros/">The Venture Bros</a></em> on Cartoon Network. Can we all just admit that it's the smartest and funniest show on television already?</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5399891/get-lost-in-the-global-village-with-this-weeks-television]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5399891]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ what to watch ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[2012 Jokes]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Batman: the brave and the bold]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Flashforward]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[fringe]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Ghost Whisperer]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Ice twisters]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Man on the Moon]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[medium]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[MythBusters]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[sanctuary]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Serenity]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[smallville]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Star Trek: Nemesis]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Star Wars: The Clone Wars]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Stargate Universe]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[supernatural]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[the prisoner]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[the venture bros]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[The war of the worlds]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Tru Calling]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[V]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Vampire diaries]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:00:00 -0800]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399891&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Unlock The Black Door With Exclusive Locke & Key Preview [Exclusive] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/lockekeytop.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/500x_lockekeytop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>We called it one of <a href="http://io9.com/5394542/5-comics-youre-not-reading-but-should-be">the five comics you should be reading</a> on Saturday, and here's another chance to get started; <em>Locke & Key</em>'s third series begins this week, and here's an exclusive preview of the first issue.</p> <p>IDW's official PR for Joe Hill and Gabriel Rodriguez' 32 page first issue goes a little something like this:</p> <blockquote> <p>Sam Lesser may be dead and gone, but Dodge still has uses for him, and in the first chill days of October, will make contact with him again. The dead know things the living may not, and Sam's restless spirit has had time to discover the thing Dodge wants to know most of all... where to find the key to the black door. The third storyline in the Eisner-nominated series begins here!</p> </blockquote> <p><script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5399963,7,''); </script><br clear="all"></p> <p><em>Locke & Key: Crown Of Shadows</em> <a href="http://io9.com/tag/1/" class="posthashtag">#1</a> is released this week.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5399897/unlock-the-black-door-with-exclusive-locke--key-preview]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5399897]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Exclusive ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Comics]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Crown of shadows]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Locke & key]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Locke & key: crown of shadows]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Preview]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:30:00 -0800]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399897&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Jones Takes Gyllenhall To Source In New Movie [Source Code] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/thumb160x_Jake_Gyllenhaal.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />The next project for <em>Moon</em>'s <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #duncanjones" href="http://io9.com/tag/duncanjones/">Duncan Jones</a> will let him trap <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jakegyllenhaal" href="http://io9.com/tag/jakegyllenhaal/">Jake Gyllenhaal</a> in a living computer that replays his most traumatic experiences over and over. Here's hoping that doesn't include <em>The Day After Tomorrow</em>.</p> <p>Jones has been announced as the director for <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sourcecode" href="http://io9.com/tag/sourcecode/">Source Code</a></em>, in which Gyllenhaal will star as a soldier who wakes up to find himself inside a computer that forces him to relive a train bombing until he can discover who was behind it. The movie, expected to go into production early next year, will be produced by Mark Gordon, one of the men behind Roland Emmerich's upcoming disaster porn <em>2012</em>.</p> <p><a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118011029.html?categoryid=13&cs=1&nid=2562">Gyllenhaal goes straight to 'Source'</a> [Variety]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5399894/jones-takes-gyllenhall-to-source-in-new-movie]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5399894]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Source code ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[duncan jones]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Jake Gyllenhaal]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Moon]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:00:25 -0800]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399894&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Clone Wars Grows Up In Front Of Your Eyes In New Box Set [DVD Review] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/clonewars1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/500x_clonewars1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Maybe I'm just a process junkie, but the best thing about <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #starwarstheclonewars" href="http://io9.com/tag/starwarstheclonewars/">Star Wars: The Clone Wars</a> - Complete Season One</em> box set may be watching the series evolve from awkward beginnings and finding its feet. That or the comedy droids.</p> <p>If you <em>are</em> a process junkie, then the boxset is made for you; along with a lovely booklet full of production sketches, each episode has an additional mini-documentary with interviews from the crew involved, as well as seven episodes with new material added for "Director's Cut" editions (Spoiler: Han doesn't shoot first in any of them). More to the point, just rewatching the series shows how the show has evolved as everyone learns what they can, and can't, get away with; I watched the first few episodes in the set after watching "Landing At Point Rain," the most recent episode of the second season, and the difference is amazing - and, for a second, somewhat damning to the first season in comparison ("Point Rain" featured not just some wonderfully choreographed battle sequences that offered a fluidity and grace that the earlier animation lacked, it was also surprisingly brutal in tone - The clones and Jedi used flamethrowers on their alien opponents and you <em>saw them burning to death</em>, which really leaves the earliest episodes of the show, uncertain about the tone just yet, looking anemic). But to concentrate on how far the show's come is to miss the point, and the fun, of the first season.</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/clonewars2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/500x_clonewars2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #clonewars" href="http://io9.com/tag/clonewars/">Clone Wars</a></em> season one was full of trial and error, yes, but even when things didn't work, they're still worth watching - even moreso on DVD, when the bad taste of the Jar-Jar-centric "Bombad Jedi" is quickly washed away by the double bill of "Cloak of Darkness" and "Lair of Grievous," both of which move more towards the self-assured tone of the movies. The show's mini-arcs make more sense when viewed together, as well (And episodes like "Storm Over Ryloth," "Innocents of Ryloth" and "Liberty on Ryloth" work better than the feature that introduced the series in the first place). But as much as the writing shifts and grows in quality and confidence throughout the series - Just compare the Ryloth episodes to "Ambush" to see what I mean - so, in a much more subtle way, do the visuals.</p> <p>Never less than impressive, even from the get-go (Just look at some of the textures used! Or the lighting! Man, it's good stuff), the animators nonetheless manage to tighten things all the way throughout the season by, ironically, loosening up: The "acting" by the characters - especially the facial movements - gets more natural as the show goes on, making it easier to empathize with the characters despite (because of) their impressive and intentional cartoony quality (Again, this is something that's all the more obvious looking at newer episodes like "Point Rain," where Anakin has some great subtle smirking going on, adding to his "Yeah, you're a hero now but you're going to end up Darth Vader because of that assholishness, buddy" thing).</p> <p>But even outside of the "Watch the show improve" aspect that made the boxset for me - I couldn't help it, I'd seen the shows before - there's a lot to like about <em>The Complete Season One</em>; yes, some of the episodes (Ahem, "Bombad Jedi") are clunkers, but the good outweigh the bad, and there's something to like in all of them. The bonus features, as I've said before, are worth watching (Especially the "Jedi Temple" extras, which I think are BluRay only?), and the format makes the multi-episode arcs much stronger than they were when first broadcast, even without the addition of the extra footage.</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/clonewars3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/500x_clonewars3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>In the end, then, there's something in <em>The Complete Season One</em> for almost everyone: Complete nerds like me get to geek out over the evolution of the show and peeks behind the scenes, casual fans who liked the series on television can enjoy the Director's Cut episodes and watching the arcs in one sitting, and newcomers... Well, they just get a pretty good cartoon that's, for the most part, more enjoyable than the prequel trilogy. Me, I'm already waiting for the <em>Complete Season Two</em> boxset to hear how they managed to get away with torching their enemies on Cartoon Network prime time.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5399347/clone-wars-grows-up-in-front-of-your-eyes-in-new-box-set]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5399347]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ DVD Review ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Clone Wars]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Overmind]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Star Wars]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Star Wars: The Clone Wars]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Star wars: the clone wars: the complete season one]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:00:51 -0800]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399347&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ 10 Favorite Faux Deaths In Science Fiction [The Walking Dead] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/dead-big.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/500x_dead-big.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Death really isn't the end in science fiction... It just depends on whether or not it can be written around later. Here are some of our favorite NotDeaths that prove that the Grim Reaper should really up his game.</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/thumb160x_dead-spock.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><strong>Spock</strong><br> <em>Died:</em> Sacrificing himself by bringing the warp engines back online at the end of <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #startrek" href="http://io9.com/tag/startrek/">Star Trek</a> II: The Wrath of Khan</em>, leading to his dying from exposure to radiation.<br> <em>Undied:</em> His body was resurrected in <em>Star Trek III: The Search For Spock</em> thanks to the Deus Ex Machina powers of the Genesis Planet, and it turned out that his soul had lived on all along thanks to mind melding with Bones.<br> <em>Cause of Undeath:</em> Mind-meld and blatant plot ridiculousness in order to keep the fans happy. Admittedly, it was all set up in <em>Star Trek II</em>, but still.<br> <em>Does It Count As Death?:</em> Well, his soul was alive the entire time in Bones, but his body had enough time to go through a funeral and being shot off into space, so... 50/50? But not really, let's face it.</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/thumb160x_deadtigh.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><strong>Ellen Tigh</strong><br> <em>Died:</em> Poisoned by her husband after (in his eyes) betraying humanity in "Exodus, Part II" at the start of <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #battlestargalactica" href="http://io9.com/tag/battlestargalactica/">Battlestar Galactica</a></em>'s third season.<br> <em>Undied:</em> Instantly downloaded into a new body as part of the Fifth Cylon retcon, as revealed in the fourth season's "Sometimes A Great Notion."<br> <em>Cause of Undeath:</em> Traditional cylon download/rebirth.<br> <em>Does It Count As Death?:</em> Well, she was <em>instantly</em> reborn, which suggests that she was never actually dead as such, but the whole Fifth Cylon thing muddies the waters... especially when she was reborn as someone who wasn't exactly the Ellen she was when she died. We're going with "Kinda, but not really."</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/thumb160x_dead-boba.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><strong>Boba Fett</strong><br> <em>Died:</em> Falling into the Sarlacc's mouth in <em>Return Of The Jedi</em>.<br> <em>Undied:</em> Climbing back out of the Sarlacc's mouth in comic sequel <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #starwars" href="http://io9.com/tag/starwars/">Star Wars</a>: Dark Empire</em>.<br> <em>Cause of Undeath:</em> He was swallowed by apparently never chewed or digested and climbed his way out, apparently.<br> <em>Does It Count As Death?:</em> If you believe <em>Dark Empire</em>, not in the slightest. George Lucas apparently disagrees, however; it's said that he edited Fett's last appearance in the special edition of <em>Return Of The Jedi</em> to make it clearer that it's meant to be the end of the character.</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/thumb160x_dead-sheridan.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><strong>John Sheridan</strong><br> <em>Died:</em> Avoiding certain death by nuclear explosion at the end of <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #babylon5" href="http://io9.com/tag/babylon5/">Babylon 5</a></em>'s third season finale, "Z'ha'dum," by jumping into a pit so deep that it was impossible to survive. Oh, and then there was that nuclear explosion, which presumably would've destroyed the pit and everything within it anyway.<br> <em>Undied:</em> At the start of the show's fourth season, Sheridan was revealed to be in a limbo between life and death because of his love for Delenn. With the help of - and 20 years worth of lifeforce from - helpful fellow limbo-ite Lorien, he comes back to the land of the living.<br> <em>Cause of Undeath:</em> As Ewan McGregor in <em>Trainspotting</em> would say, choosing life. Who knew it was that simple?<br> <em>Does It Count As Death?:</em> Nope. Think of it as getting as far as death's foyer, before deciding to turn back because you'd changed your mind.</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/thumb160x_dead-yar.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><strong>Tasha Yar</strong><br> <em>Died:</em> Wanting out of her Starfleet contract early, Denise Crosby got her character killed at the hands of a gloopy, ooky oil monster in the first season episode of <em>Star Trek: The Next Generation</em> "Skin of Evil."<br> <em>Undied:</em> Thanks to time travel shenanigans, turns out never to have died in the alternate timeline of third season episode "Yesterday's Enterprise," and then manages to return to the past of the original timeline at the end of the episode in a way that still doesn't make a lot of sense.<br> <em>Cause of Undeath:</em> Alternate timelines having prevented her from dying in the first place.<br> <em>Does It Count As Death?:</em> Well, <em>a</em> Tasha Yar definitely died. In fact, as we learn upon the appearance of the second Yar's daughter Sela, the other Tasha was killed unsuccessfully trying to escape from the Romulans, so it looks as if any and all Tashas would end up dead one way or another.</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/thumb160x_dead-superman.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><strong>Superman</strong><br> <em>Died:</em> At the hands of the apparently unstoppable Doomsday in 1993's <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #thedeathofsuperman" href="http://io9.com/tag/thedeathofsuperman/">The Death of Superman</a></em> storyline.<br> <em>Undied:</em> Midway through the follow-on <em>The Return of Superman</em> storyline, when it's been revealed that none of the four characters who've taken up the mantle are the real thing.<br> <em>Cause of Undeath:</em> He woke up. No, really; the audience is pretty much told that he'd never died in the first place, he'd just gone into superhibernation in order to heal from the fight.<br> <em>Does It Count As Death?:</em> Not at all, but it definitely counted as a moneyspinner for DC Comics, who went on to kill Green Arrow and Green Lantern within the next couple of years, as well as teasing deaths for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #theflash" href="http://io9.com/tag/theflash/">the Flash</a> and breaking Batman's back.</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/thumb160x_dead-bucky.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><strong>Bucky</strong><br> <em>Died:</em> Trapped on a bomb that mentor and Nazi-fighting partner <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #captainamerica" href="http://io9.com/tag/captainamerica/">Captain America</a> had managed to jump off of before it exploded, as explained way back in 1963's <em>Avengers</em> series.<br> <em>Undied:</em> In 2005's "Winter Soldier" storyline of <em>Captain America</em>, where he got reintroduced and prepped to become the new Captain America in 2007.<br> <em>Cause of Undeath:</em> Turns out that Bucky <em>was</em>, in fact, blown to bits by the exploding bomb... It's just that they were pretty large bits. Large enough to rebuild him into a brainwashed no-good commie assassin who gets put on ice between missions, until he meets Cap, goes rogue, remembers who he is, and then uses his mighty Russian technology for the good of American mankind.<br> <em>Does It Count As Death?:</em> What's brainwashed Russian assassin for no?</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/thumb160x_dead-flash.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><strong>The Flash</strong><br> <em>Died:</em> Which one? Barry Allen died in 1985's <em>Crisis On Infinite Earths</em>. Wally West disappeared and was, at various times, presumed dead/missing/no-one could make up their mind in 2004's <em>Infinite Crisis</em>, and Bart Allen kicked the bucket in 2007's <em>The Flash: The Fastest Man Alive</em> <a href="http://io9.com/tag/13/" class="posthashtag">#13</a>.<br> <em>Undied:</em> Wally came back in 2007's <em>Justice League of America</em> <a href="http://io9.com/tag/10/" class="posthashtag">#10</a>, Barry in 2008's <em>Final Crisis</em> <a href="http://io9.com/tag/1/" class="posthashtag">#1</a> and Bart in 2009's <em>Final Crisis: Legion of Three Worlds</em> <a href="http://io9.com/tag/4/" class="posthashtag">#4</a>.<br> <em>Cause of Undeath:</em> Both Barry and Wally had, it turns out, never died. Barry had been swallowed into the Speed Force, which is the cosmic... thing... that gives all super-speed characters their powers in the DC Universe, while Wally's fate was ultimately (after a couple of failed attempts that were quickly contradicted) decided upon a variation of "He took his family on vacation to an alien planet and didn't tell anyone." Don't ask. Bart, meanwhile, <em>did</em> die, kind of... but his teenage self was trapped in a futuristic lightning rod and then magically released in the 31st century to fight Superboy Prime. Again, it's probably better if you didn't ask.<br> <em>Does It Count As Death?:</em> No question for either Barry or Wally (No), but Bart... I have no idea. I've read <em>Legion of Three Worlds</em> multiple times, and still don't understand the explanation that's given there; let's just never mention it again and pretend it didn't happen.</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/thumb160x_dead-jason.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jasontodd" href="http://io9.com/tag/jasontodd/">Jason Todd</a></strong><br> <em>Died:</em> As the result of a real-life phone vote to see if Todd, the second Robin (as in <em>Batman and</em>), should be killed at the hands of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #thejoker" href="http://io9.com/tag/thejoker/">the Joker</a>. Seriously, 1988's comic industry, what the hell were you thinking?<br> <em>Undied:</em> 2004's <em>Batman</em> revealed that Todd was not only not dead, but had magically aged more than most other characters in the DC Universe in his off-panel absence.<br> <em>Cause of Undeath:</em> Superboy was punching the walls of reality, and things went a bit weird. You know how it is with these superheroes and their punching the walls of reality; history gets rewritten all over the place. Just be glad that Batman didn't end up as Batdinosaur. Although, now that we think about it, that'd be <em>awesome</em>.<br> <em>Does It Count As Death?:</em> Magically contradicting Schrodinger and his cat, Jason Todd both did <em>and</em> didn't die. His official history has it that he died, and then just came back to life thanks to the punching of reality, meaning that he was still alive. So, while it ultimately doesn't count as <em>permanent</em> death, there was a death in there somewhere.</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/thumb160x_dead-phoenix.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jeangrey" href="http://io9.com/tag/jeangrey/">Jean Grey</a></strong><br> <em>Died:</em> In 1980's famous <em>Uncanny X-Men</em> <a href="http://io9.com/tag/137/" class="posthashtag">#137</a>, where she sacrifices herself for the good of the universe to stop herself from becoming overwhelmed by the godlike power she possessed that might lead her to eat a couple of planets if she got peckish.<br> <em>Undied:</em> It's revealed in 1986's <em>Fantastic Four</em> <a href="http://io9.com/tag/286/" class="posthashtag">#286</a> that the Jean Grey who killed herself was never actually Jean Grey at all, but the Phoenix force, who's been cosmically imprinted with Jean's personality. Don't worry; the Phoenix force was already back by that point anyway.<br> <em>Cause of Undeath:</em> Jean hadn't died (at that point), and the resurrection of the Phoenix force was somewhat implied by the name - The official explanation was that the Phoenix force hadn't actually died either, just lain dormant until someone else (Jean's daughter from an alternate timeline. If you don't already know, don't ask) claimed it.<br> <em>Does It Count As Death?:</em> Before the retcon and <em>ruined Chris Claremont's X-Men once and for all you bastards</em>, it did. Now? No-one died until years later, when Jean really got the Phoenix power and then ended up dying anyway. Guess there's something unlucky about the name or something.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5394392/10-favorite-faux-deaths-in-science-fiction]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5394392]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ the walking dead ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[babylon 5]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Batman]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Battlestar Galactica]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Bucky]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[captain america]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Comics]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Jason Todd]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Jean Grey]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[List]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Overmind]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Phoenix]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[star trek the next generation]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Star Wars]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Superman]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[The death of superman]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[the flash]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[The Joker]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[X-men]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:00:11 -0800]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5394392&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ In Space, No-One Can Hear Us Squee [Aliens] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/aliensmayberry1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/500x_aliensmayberry1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Fanfiction comes in many shapes and sizes, but rarely does it look as cool as <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #paulmayberry" href="http://io9.com/tag/paulmayberry/">Paul Mayberry</a>'s wonderful <em>Alien</em> short. Someone, please let this guy go a full-length <em>Aliens</em> comic sometime soon (Click through for the rest). [<a href="http://paulmay.livejournal.com/116939.html">LJ</a>] (<a href="http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/halloween-reading-paul-mayburys-aliens-strip/">Via</a>)</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/alienmayberry2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/500x_alienmayberry2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br> <a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/aliensmayberry3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/500x_aliensmayberry3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5394249/in-space-no+one-can-hear-us-squee]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5394249]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Aliens ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Alien]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[fan fiction]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Paul mayberry]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Webcomic]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:00:26 -0800]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5394249&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Is Thursday The New Friday? [Tv Deathwatch] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/thumb160x_fringe1_01.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />With <em>Smallville</em>'s ratings on the rise, it looks like we may have found a show that survives the Friday Night Death Curse, and just in time: Now it's looking like Thursdays are also nights that will kill our favorite shows.</p> <p>Both <em>Fringe</em> and <em>FlashForward</em> are seeing ratings in a worrying freefall right now; <a href="http://io9.com/5392971/are-fringe-and-heroes-circling-the-drain">Meredith has already reported</a> that <em>Fringe</em> was being considered a show in "trouble," but that was before the audience <a href="http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/11/community-parks-rise-fringe-drops.html">dropped a worrying 23% for this Thursday's episode</a> (In its defense, many people may have been unaware that it was even on; a lot of schedules didn't list the episode, instead telling viewers that it was the seventh game of the World Series). Seeing a less dramatic drop, but still something that's started rumors of a lack of second season renewal, <em>FlashForward</em> slumped even further this week and, as <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/11/07/jumping-ahead-to-flashforwards-future/32911">TV By The Numbers showed</a>, continued a speedy decline in the number of viewers each week towards the point of no return.</p> <p>We already know that Thursday is a packed night of television, but is it so packed that it's going to kill shows we love (or, in the case of <em>FlashForward</em>, like enough to keep watching and hoping for the best)? Or will the success of the <em>V</em> premiere remind networks that Tuesday night is always an option?</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5399445/is-thursday-the-new-friday]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5399445]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Tv deathwatch ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Flashforward]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[fringe]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Thursdays]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:00:09 -0800]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399445&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Introducing An Ancestor Of The First Space Elevator [Power Beaming Challenge] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/spaceelevator.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Only four years after it was first created, an annual competition set up to promote wireless energy transfer in hopes of speeding the creation of a Space Elevator has finally managed to give out one of its two cash prizes.</p> <p>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #powerbeamingchallenge" href="http://io9.com/tag/powerbeamingchallenge/">Power Beaming Challenge</a> was founded in 2005 (and seeded with $2 million in prize money by NASA) to discover the remotely-powered robot that could best ascend a cable as quickly and safely as possible; this year's winner, built by a team from Seattle's LaserMotive, was the first ever to complete the climb at a speed greater than 2 meters per second, and therefore the first to win one of the Challenge's two prizes (The remaining $1.1 million is for any robot that can climb faster than 5 meters per second; the top speed of LaserMotive's robot was 3.9 meters a second).</p> <p>While the space elevator dream remains a long-term dream, NASA say that there are much closer goals for wireless power beaming, including powering solar powered lunar vehicles when they're in areas where solar energy is unavailable.</p> <p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18122-space-elevator-wins-900000-nasa-prize.html">'Space elevator' wins $900,000 NASA prize</a> [New Scientist]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5399447/introducing-an-ancestor-of-the-first-space-elevator]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5399447]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Power beaming challenge ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lasermotive]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Nasa]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:00:54 -0800]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399447&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ New Official Posters For Wolfman Make Us Drool [The Wolfman] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/wolfmanpostersmall.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The first teaser posters for Joe Johnson's <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #thewolfman" href="http://io9.com/tag/thewolfman/">The Wolfman</a></em> (Released February 2010) are out, giving glimpses of Benicio Del Toro's hairy alter ego and Emily Blunt's damsel in distress. Click through to see them.</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/wolfmanposter1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/500x_wolfmanposter1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br> <a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/wolfmanposter2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/500x_wolfmanposter2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br> [<a href="http://www.aintitcool.com/node/43001">Ain't It Cool</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/06/exclusive-the-wolfman-poster-premiere/">Cinematical</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5399437/new-official-posters-for-wolfman-make-us-drool]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5399437]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ The Wolfman ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Posters]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[wolfman]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:00:05 -0800]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399437&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
    
			</channel>
</rss>