<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[io9: Stephen King's N]]></title>
		
		<link>http://io9.com/tag/stephen king's n</link>
		<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://gawker.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
		<description><![CDATA[io9 posts tagged Stephen King's N]]></description>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Why Motion Isn't The Future Of Comics]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Why Motion Isn't The Future Of Comics" href="http://io9.com/motion-comics/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">motioncomics</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Why Motion Isn't The Future Of Comics" href="http://io9.com/5032273/why-motion-isnt-the-future-of-comics" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Why Motion Isn't The Future Of Comics" alt="Click here to read Why Motion Isn't The Future Of Comics" src="http://cache.io9.com/assets/images/8/2008/08/motioncomics.jpg"/>
						<span class="play_icon"></span>					</a></div>
									</div>
				Whether you call them "motion comics," "cinematic comics" or even "cutting edge content for the new digital format," there's no getting away from the fact that comic companies are all trying to entice new fans by bringing their stories online. With Marvel Comics' new <em>Stephen King's N</em> joining DC's <em>Watchmen</em> and Image's <em>Invincible</em> series for MTV, everyone seems to be jumping on the animated adaptation bandwagon. We have only one question to ask: Has no-one told any of these people that these cut-price cartoons kind of suck?				<a href="http://io9.com/5032273/why-motion-isnt-the-future-of-comics" title="Click here to read more about Why Motion Isn't The Future Of Comics">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5032273/why-motion-isnt-the-future-of-comics]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5032273]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Motion comics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[invincible]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Saved By The Bell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Stephen king's n]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[watchmen]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 02 Aug 2008 14:00:33 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Graeme McMillan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5032273&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

