• io9
  • science
  • overmind
  • kotaku
  • gizmodo
  • Profile logout login

#2009moviepreview##stylessitecss#a

io9

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #observationdeck,
  • #tips,
  • #calendar,
  • etc.

San Francisco, 11:14 AM
Tue Dec 8
28 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip your editors:

Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |

News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |

Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |

Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |

Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |

Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |

Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |

Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |

More:
io9 on Facebook
follow io9 on Twitter

SUBSCRIBE TO io9 RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
1428 Subscribers
io9
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of disatess disatess
    10/18/09

    In reply to Rorschach is Not Sinestro... Yet
    No, He`s all wrong for the part ,sinestro is tall ,smart and very arogant (excuse the misspell).

    I know that Jackie Earle Harley is good actor , he made a great Rorschach , despite the rest of the movie . But I think the part is simply wrong for him . #greenlantern
     Reply
    disatess was starred disatess was unstarred
    Image of Starwatcher Starwatcher
    10/18/09

    In reply to Rorschach is Not Sinestro... Yet
    Haley's definitely got the insane-looking skull for Sinestro. #greenlantern
     Reply
    Starwatcher was starred Starwatcher was unstarred
    Image of Wookie1972 Wookie1972
    10/18/09

    @Starwatcher: I dunno, I really think Sinestro needs an English accent. Which I realize is odd, because he's an alien, but whatever. #greenlantern
     Reply
    Wookie1972 was starred Wookie1972 was unstarred
    Image of Wookie1972 Wookie1972
    10/18/09

    In reply to Rorschach is Not Sinestro... Yet
    Oh, and Guy Gardner? Mr. Bruce Campbell (or, alternatively, if he's too old, Will Arnett) #greenlantern
     Reply
    Wookie1972 was starred Wookie1972 was unstarred
    Image of Makidian Makidian
    10/18/09

    @Wookie1972: Very good choices, but I think Bruce would be a much better Guy Gardner, Will Arnett is too...wiry. I think Bruce would fill out the roll better, literally. #greenlantern
     Reply
    Makidian was starred Makidian was unstarred
    Image of Guitaratomik Guitaratomik
    10/18/09

    @Wookie1972: I think both of them are too old. Guy Gardner should be one of the younger ones shouldn't he? #greenlantern
     Reply
    Wookie1972 promoted this comment Guitaratomik was starred Guitaratomik was unstarred
    Image of Wookie1972 Wookie1972
    10/18/09

    @Guitaratomik: I thought Gardner was around the same age as Hal, maybe even a little older. He became a GL later, but I thought he seemed a little older. Arnett is at most a few years older than Reynolds. #greenlantern
     Reply
    Wookie1972 was starred Wookie1972 was unstarred
    Image of MIster_C MIster_C
    10/18/09

    In reply to Rorschach is Not Sinestro... Yet
    I Haily I truly do, but not as Sinestro #greenlantern
     Reply
    MIster_C was starred MIster_C was unstarred
    Image of Guitaratomik Guitaratomik
    10/18/09

    In reply to Rorschach is Not Sinestro... Yet
    Yeah, as much as I love JEH, I really don't think he'd make a good Sinestro. Sinestro needs to be more regal and....taller. I've heard both Hugo Weaving and Paul Bettany thrown around as ideas from fans and I think those choices fit much better. You could probably do better than that even. #greenlantern
     Reply
    Wookie1972 promoted this comment Guitaratomik was starred Guitaratomik was unstarred
    Image of Wookie1972 Wookie1972
    10/18/09

    @Guitaratomik: Considering that the model for Sinestro was David Niven, I think you're closer with Weaving or Bettany than Haley. My first thought was Guy Pearce (also for the Riddler), but another that comes to mind is Hugh Laurie (possibly a little too old). #greenlantern
     Reply
    Wookie1972 was starred Wookie1972 was unstarred
    Image of Guitaratomik Guitaratomik
    10/18/09

    @Wookie1972: I think Sinestro should be a bit older than Hal. He should be more a father figure than a brother so Hugh Laurie would actually be pretty interesting. #greenlantern
     Reply
    Guitaratomik was starred Guitaratomik was unstarred
    Image of Wookie1972 Wookie1972
    10/18/09

    @Guitaratomik: Any one of them could pull off the sophistication. Haley... I'm sorry, but he seems to play a lot of seedy characters. #greenlantern
     Reply
    Wookie1972 was starred Wookie1972 was unstarred
    Image of RoboBagins RoboBagins
    10/18/09

    @Guitaratomik: Yeah, Hugo Weaving could pull it off. Love to see him slinging the green. #greenlantern
     Reply
    RoboBagins was starred RoboBagins was unstarred
    Image of GreyHammer GreyHammer
    10/18/09

    In reply to Rorschach is Not Sinestro... Yet
    i like how this article ninja'd in. guess the otehr one was posted in error?

    anyways i dont see him so much as sinestro, but again i have only seen him as rorshach. i dont want the christian bale rasp treatment on sinestro. #greenlantern
     Reply
    GreyHammer was starred GreyHammer was unstarred
    Image of Graeme McMillan Graeme McMillan
    10/18/09

    @GreyHammer: See below - I'd accidentally posted a story Meredith had already posted earlier this week, so figured everyone'd prefer something they hadn't already read.

    I do, however, like the idea of me as ninja. ;) #greenlantern
     Reply
    Graeme McMillan was starred Graeme McMillan was unstarred
    Image of GreyHammer GreyHammer
    10/18/09

    @Graeme McMillan: ah ok cool. yeah i wondered about that.

    i hope the green lantern production gets ironed out. i have been wanting to see this movie for a long time it seems. #greenlantern
     Reply
    GreyHammer was starred GreyHammer was unstarred
    Image of Graeme McMillan Graeme McMillan
    10/18/09

    In reply to Rorschach is Not Sinestro... Yet

    To all concerned: Yup, this is a replacement for the duplicate Nathan Fillion/Greatest American Hero post that I unknowingly repeated from Meredith. Lest it be said that I stole a Fillion pic from you, however: #greenlantern
     Reply
    Graeme McMillan was starred Graeme McMillan was unstarred
    Image of El_Wray El_Wray
    01/09/09

    In reply to 30 Fantastic Movies To Watch (Or Avoid) This Year
    you forgot to say X-Men origins is a MUST NOT WATCH film. I don't care if watchmen comes out on schedule. Fox shoud be punished.
     Reply
    El_Wray was starred El_Wray was unstarred
    Image of Charlie Jane Anders Charlie Jane Anders
    01/10/09

    @El_Wray: Well, this is a preview of the movies themselves... I already discussed the issue of the Fox boycott in a different post...
     Reply
    Charlie Jane Anders was starred Charlie Jane Anders was unstarred
    Image of chris.rich.design chris.rich.design
    01/09/09

    In reply to 30 Fantastic Movies To Watch (Or Avoid) This Year
    No Disney-Pixar's Up?
     Reply
    chris.rich.design was starred chris.rich.design was unstarred
    Image of Charlie Jane Anders Charlie Jane Anders
    01/09/09

    @chris.rich.design: Is there anything SF or fantasy about that movie? I thought it was just about a guy who attaches balloons to his house.
     Reply
    Charlie Jane Anders was starred Charlie Jane Anders was unstarred
    Image of Richard Jay Cooper Richard Jay Cooper
    01/09/09

    In reply to 30 Fantastic Movies To Watch (Or Avoid) This Year
    In my opinion, this has to be one of the best all-around articles you guys have posted. I have seen almost all the trailers, previews and "first glimpse" stuff you guys have put out on these films but this sums them all up in a really nice package. Thanks!
     Reply
    Richard Jay Cooper was starred Richard Jay Cooper was unstarred
    Image of Charlie Jane Anders Charlie Jane Anders
    01/09/09

    @Richard Jay Cooper: Yay thanks!
     Reply
    Charlie Jane Anders was starred Charlie Jane Anders was unstarred
    Image of Steve Bunche Steve Bunche
    01/09/09

    In reply to 30 Fantastic Movies To Watch (Or Avoid) This Year
    I work at the design firm that's handling some of the tie-in merchandise for Monsters Vs. Aliens and I can tell you from firsthand knowledge that the film has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with Rex Havoc and the Asskickers of the Fantastic. I'd heard the film described as a Rex Havoc movie and almost jumped out of my skin upon hearing it since the Rex Havoc stories are some of my favorite comics of all time (there were four of them and they ran in Warren Publications' 1984 magazine), but upon seeing the material being worked on here at the design studio it's clear it ain't Rex Havoc. Is the film company still promoting it as such?
     Reply
    Steve Bunche was starred Steve Bunche was unstarred
    Image of Charlie Jane Anders Charlie Jane Anders
    01/09/09

    @Steve Bunche: Our former writer, Kevin Kelly, was the one who was sure it was a Rex Havoc movie... aren't some of these characters from the Rex Havoc comic? Maybe we just got misinformed. I'm seeing Jeffrey Katzenberg present some footage from the movie in a week or so, and I want to ask him about it.
     Reply
    Charlie Jane Anders was starred Charlie Jane Anders was unstarred
    Image of Andrew Liptak Andrew Liptak
    01/09/09

    In reply to 30 Fantastic Movies To Watch (Or Avoid) This Year
    No mention of Fanboys?
     Reply
    Andrew Liptak was starred Andrew Liptak was unstarred
    Image of Adah Adah
    01/09/09

    @JediTrilobite: Does it have a definite release date? I feel like I've been reading about that movie since 2006.
     Reply
    Adah was starred Adah was unstarred
    Image of Charlie Jane Anders Charlie Jane Anders
    01/09/09

    @Adah: I think it's coming out in a few months. We cover it on the site because it's so closely related to science fiction, but I didn't feel the need to include it on a list of SF/F movies.
     Reply
    Charlie Jane Anders was starred Charlie Jane Anders was unstarred
    Image of Andrew Liptak Andrew Liptak
    01/09/09

    @Adah: Wikipedia lists it as being released February 6th, 2009.
     Reply
    Andrew Liptak was starred Andrew Liptak was unstarred
    Image of Anthony Moody Anthony Moody
    01/08/09

    In reply to 30 Fantastic Movies To Watch (Or Avoid) This Year
    When is Time Traveler's Wife supposed to come out?
     Reply
    Anthony Moody was starred Anthony Moody was unstarred
    Image of Charlie Jane Anders Charlie Jane Anders
    01/09/09

    @Anthony Moody: Hmmm good question. I feel like that movie dropped off the radar. I know it's done filming. At least I think it is. I should look into that!
     Reply
    Charlie Jane Anders was starred Charlie Jane Anders was unstarred
    Image of Alexis Alexis
    01/08/09

    In reply to 30 Fantastic Movies To Watch (Or Avoid) This Year
    Ugh.


    I like the concept of "The Box," but Kelly's Southland Tales was the first movie to make me actually shake with anger. That movie was so epic in its shittiness that I have to spit whenever I hear the name.


    Ok, that was overdramtic, I admit. But I fucking hate that movie.

     Reply
    Alexis was starred Alexis was unstarred
    Image of MinervaAlpaca MinervaAlpaca
    01/08/09

    In reply to 30 Fantastic Movies To Watch (Or Avoid) This Year
    And again the new UNDERWORLD movie gets snubbed?


    I'd claim werewolf discrimination, but THE WOLFMAN and NEW MOON both got listed.


    What have you folks got against UNDERWORLD?

     Reply
    MinervaAlpaca was starred MinervaAlpaca was unstarred
    Image of Charlie Jane Anders Charlie Jane Anders
    01/09/09

    @MinervaAlpaca: Isn't it set during the middle ages? It's a prequel, right? We talked about it the other day and decided it doesn't quite fit in with the idea of "urban fantasy or fantasy that takes place in the present day." Arbitrary, I know, but there you have it.
     Reply
    Charlie Jane Anders was starred Charlie Jane Anders was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or io9 account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.