I love how everything that incorporates an interesting little bit of new imagery is immediately labeled a new genre and the -punk suffix is added. Cyber- and Steampunk I'm perfectly willing to legitimize as genres dealing with particular eras and applications of technology. Biopunk, I'm more on the fence about, but this? Really? Come ON. Oh yeah, and dieselpunk is nothing more than a fledgling aesthetic. Why people are so eager to pigeonhole and genre-fy something, I don't know.
Little Big Planet was not an influence for Shane Acker's '9.' If anything, it was the other way around.
Here's a short history of '9' - you can fact check this on imdb, wiki and even other interviews with Acker himself.
'9' the feature film is based on a short film that Acker started about 10 years ago for his thesis project at UCLA. The short, also titled '9,' has the same character designs as the feature. The short played in Sundance in 2005 and won the Student Academy Award the same year. It was nominated for the Academy Award in 2006.
Little Big Planet on the other hand was released in late 2008 - that's 9 years *after* Acker started the short, and 3 years *after* the short was in wide circulation on the festival circuit.
You should all know that nine came before Little Big Planet as the movie is based off of a short movie that came out before LGP. It's probably coincidence or if you refuse to believe in coincidence than LGP would have stolen from 9
Yes, as I was watching 9 last night it made me think of Little Big Planet, albeit Little Big Planet on a nasty trip. I definitely preferred 9 - maybe if Little Big Planet had more death-bots in need of blowing up I would enjoy it more.
Coraline and LBP didn't really have any influence on 9. The original 9 film was released in 2005, before LBP and Coraline were in production. But if Stitchpunk does become some bigger style/genre, I could see including them as co-originators.
@rob_p: Probably more of a coincidence really but you would have to ask Media Molecule or Shane Acker if it was more than just that snce boh were conceived in the same year.
@Makidian: It may just be a coincidence. But they weren't both conceived of in the same year, or at least in no trackable way.
The original 9 short feature was released in April of 2005, and according to wikipedia, took four and a half years to make. Media Molecule wasn't formed until 2006, and Little Big Planet not announced to 2007. It is possible that the Media Molecule guys had the idea of a sackboy 6 years before they formed their company, but it seems unlikely.
I thought I had heard months back that Media Molecule admitted 9 inspired them, but can't find the citation, so can't say that wasn't an unfounded rumor.
@Spiral: Actually the concept was brought about in 2005 when the founders of MM left Lionead because they didn't like the idea, so feasibly they could have be coincidentally thought of. Or it's likely one inspired the other, since it can't be said for sure that they were going to use sack persons in LBP. Either way the workd is better for it, at least mine is.
09/15/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
Here's a short history of '9' - you can fact check this on imdb, wiki and even other interviews with Acker himself.
'9' the feature film is based on a short film that Acker started about 10 years ago for his thesis project at UCLA. The short, also titled '9,' has the same character designs as the feature. The short played in Sundance in 2005 and won the Student Academy Award the same year. It was nominated for the Academy Award in 2006.
Little Big Planet on the other hand was released in late 2008 - that's 9 years *after* Acker started the short, and 3 years *after* the short was in wide circulation on the festival circuit.
09/13/09
09/13/09
Since you have used Tim Burton in so many examples, maybe his vision and influence is the overriding factor.
09/13/09
09/13/09
09/13/09
09/13/09
It was a short before it was a feature.
09/13/09
09/13/09
The original 9 short feature was released in April of 2005, and according to wikipedia, took four and a half years to make. Media Molecule wasn't formed until 2006, and Little Big Planet not announced to 2007. It is possible that the Media Molecule guys had the idea of a sackboy 6 years before they formed their company, but it seems unlikely.
I thought I had heard months back that Media Molecule admitted 9 inspired them, but can't find the citation, so can't say that wasn't an unfounded rumor.
09/13/09
09/13/09
09/13/09
09/13/09