Godspeed Endeavor. :( I remember entering that contest where they let schoolchildren name the next Space Shuttle after the Challenger accident. I think I voted for something like "Intrepid," but I'm glad they chose Endeavor.
*sigh* there goes one of them, all thanks to the Bush Administration raping NASA, we won't be able to send any astronauts into space for like... the next decade after all 3 are decommissioned. We can't purchase flight spots from Russia either to maintain our multi-billion dollar parts on the ISS because Bush decided to put them on some sort of terrorist blacklist. And now we're draining all the money out of our next generation shuttles... I get all depressed just thinking about it.
That giant protective cover on the Shuttle's engines looks like a big white diaper. So of course, the first thing that pops into my head is "Why does NASA seem to have this fixation with cross-country diaper trips?"
$1.8M, you say? Dang. That kind of startled me. I guess I just keep watching these things happen and wishing they'd keep going, without realizing the resources we're really putting into the space program. But I wonder, er, is it really going to be more cost effective to go back to one-shot rockets with Orion program?
@papercup mixmaster: orion ain't a 1 shot... the capsule is meant for several reuses before it's scrapped... I think the launcher is also reusable (being based on Shuttle boosters)
Nitpick: the orbiter's name is spelled "Endeavour", not "Endeavor". However, this is hardly the first time the shuttle's name has suffered this unfortunate typo:
If it's that inappropriate, how about y'all just move on to the next post of which you DO approve. It apparently interested you enough for you to read it, and then waste the rest of our times with foolish questions and complaints.
Or, as I once had to tell myself while clenching my teeth and trying to keep from simultaneously sobbing and vomiting from agony, any landing you can walk away from is a good landing.
12/11/08
12/10/08
12/10/08
12/10/08
12/10/08
12/10/08
12/10/08
12/11/08
/Yah, probably not.
12/10/08
12/10/08
12/10/08
12/10/08
12/10/08
12/10/08
[www.local6.com]
12/10/08
12/10/08
12/08/08
And who knows, maybe it WAS shot down by aliens.
Carry on.
12/08/08
Like a "water landing?"
12/08/08
12/08/08
Or, as I once had to tell myself while clenching my teeth and trying to keep from simultaneously sobbing and vomiting from agony, any landing you can walk away from is a good landing.
12/08/08
...Are you a spaceman?
12/08/08
12/09/08
12/08/08
12/08/08
But seriously, though, how is this science-related?
12/08/08
12/08/08
Too Soon?
12/08/08
12/08/08
12/08/08
[news.bbc.co.uk]