io9 
Enter your username and password.
San Francisco, 6:16 PM
Sat Nov 7
12 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors: tips@io9.com
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz | Email
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders | Email
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner | Email
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis | Email
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan | Email
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier | Email
Ed Grabianowski | Email
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan | Email
Lauren Davis | Email
Chris Hsiang | Email
Lynn Peril | Email
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins | Email
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox | Email
Interns:
Tim Barribeau | Email
Julia Carusillo | Email
Alex Eichler | Email
Cyriaque Lamar | Email
Caitlin Petrakovitz | Email
Mary Ratliff | Email
Josh Snyder | Email
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
11/05/09
However, the artist shows the Global Hawk, an unarmed high-altitude recce aircraft as a strike platform. Kinda kills the mood, you'd think he could have Googled "predator"...
-Kle. #robopocalypse
11/04/09
What I wouldn't give for a good EMP device right about now.
Number five is alive my ass!
Sing Daisy, pinhead! #robopocalypse
11/04/09
See, that is the case unless someone gets their mits on Mom's universal remote.
Then you may proceed with the mass wholesale EMPing of the metal bastards.
And Old Mutual Liberty Insurance with Robot Coverage! #robopocalypse
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
No, Predators (assuming they're ALIEN aliens.) #robopocalypse
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
Lets face it, Hollywood is not the best place to go looking for accurate depictions of our future. #robopocalypse
11/04/09
11/04/09
If they're sentient, distributed and immortal. They're not people.
Wishing it so, won't make it so. #robopocalypse
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/05/09
Personhood based on non-cognitive criteria doesn't compute for me, anyways. #robopocalypse
11/05/09
11/05/09
When he say's mobile I believe he just means corporeal and limited to one instance - Johnny 5 was a person, Skynet is more like a God.
10/30/09
Some say in ice.
From what I've tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To say that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice.
-Robert Frost, 1920
I don't think the conceptual point of the missing apocalypse developed in the 90s. Note also Teasdale's "There Will Come Soft Rains" from the same year, where the only description is "war," not why this one was wholly destructive. What I think is more at hand is the "science" in science fiction. Especially for a purist, the lack of an explanation strikes as good as "a wizard did it." That's not going to cut it for a lot of people.
Likewise, there's the question of how much the event matters. Zombies aren't bombs. If you just want to hit a reset button on human society, it's not really worth dwelling in the details thereto. On the other hand, something like SF is going to frequently maximize on those details. So it's less of a dip and more of a peak before.
Which is dangerous to write, because I think it risks coming off as overly critical of not explaining. I actually prefer not explaining, for another reason, which may (to reverse positions) explain the 90s dip.
One of the more salient criticisms of the Watchmen movie (and by extension the comic) was that it managed to be both hopelessly naive and overly bleak. The Cold War taught an important lesson, namely that stuff just keeps going on. It's never as dramatic as all that. We didn't destroy ourselves, despite how close we may have actually been, which gives a sheen of the unrealistic to any situation where we do.
This is not quite that it's cliche. It's almost the opposite. It's a realization that the whole necessary system is just that more obnoxiously complex. #apocalypse
10/29/09
10/29/09
Because I wonder if the breakdown in the pattern could be attributable to a rise in the volume of post-apocalypse fiction muddying up the waters. #apocalypse
10/30/09
But yes, up till the 1950s there aren't nearly as many pa books being churned out - volume peaks in the 50s and in the 80s, if I remember correctly.
10/29/09
But I actually liked seeing how everything got destroyed and reading all the processes that caused the chain of events and actually seeing happen! :[
Besides, once you finish the disasters, it usually gets resorted to some kind of "new beginnings" morality that everyone must follow... #apocalypse
10/29/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/29/09
10/29/09
I compromised by quoting him all over the place.
10/29/09
Another interesting thing on that map - there's NO apocalyptic fiction during most of WWI, and the WWII period's dominated by "unexplained apocalypse" stories. #apocalypse
10/29/09
10/29/09
Maybe in a world still run by the baby boomers the how is not just less relevant but irrelevant to the occurrence of the end of the world. #apocalypse