@Dunny0:
1: The apparent 'cockpit canopy bump' is too far forward.
So they look 'cab forward' like a Lamborghini vs a Ferrari.
So your 'eye' tells you the centre of gravity is in the wrong place and it shouldn't fly.
2: They adopt a different flight 'attitude' because there is no pilot's eyeline to be flown 'around'.
So they look like they're 'pointing' in the wrong direction to be flying where they're going.
3: In flight there is a lack of dynamic pilot control inputs.
So they don't look like they're being 'flown'.
4: There is no pilot's helmet visible.
So there is no perceived 'eye contact' with the pilot.
I am all for these crafts being used killing scumbag terrorists who are cowards and would never face a man eye to eye.give em a taste of their own medicine and bomb them to t he stone age for all I care.
And they keep the good guys safe and the bad guys can keep watching the sky. #design
Sure it might have problems with identifying who is surrendering or not and its indiscriminate use of force, but it will inadvertently make the wait times for border crossing so much easier. #design
ah, the Mars Opposition. I remember those days.. waiting in the trenches on Phobos, shotty at the ready.. the moment I saw that Cyberdemon, I knew I had to get the hell outta Dodge. #mars
@geekgrrl: So you're the one who ran. the entire flank rolled up that night, and we lost the 3rd and the 4th. I still lie awake at night, screaming. #mars
So funny that it was Amherst College that did this. Though considering that we now have an Extraterrestrial Studies course at Hampshire, maybe they should hand us over the reins the next time Mars comes back. #mars
@GreyHammer: Its the best way to communicate with a race that is determined not to take Global Warming, economic depression and pollution for an answer. Next thing will be giving humanity messages via our iPhones. There really is an app for everything. #mars
@GreyHammer: Considering how prevalent electromagnetic radiation is across the universe, it's not a crazy assumption. And radio frequencies are a pretty good subset of the spectrum (easy to make, low power, good permeability, etc). Of all of the things we assume other life will be like us, I think this as a mode of long-range communication is a pretty safe assumption. #mars
11/10/09
11/11/09
11/10/09
I think this sweet bastard is currently in development: #design
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
1: The apparent 'cockpit canopy bump' is too far forward.
So they look 'cab forward' like a Lamborghini vs a Ferrari.
So your 'eye' tells you the centre of gravity is in the wrong place and it shouldn't fly.
2: They adopt a different flight 'attitude' because there is no pilot's eyeline to be flown 'around'.
So they look like they're 'pointing' in the wrong direction to be flying where they're going.
3: In flight there is a lack of dynamic pilot control inputs.
So they don't look like they're being 'flown'.
4: There is no pilot's helmet visible.
So there is no perceived 'eye contact' with the pilot.
5: It's a machine. #design
11/11/09
11/10/09
#design
11/10/09
11/10/09
Predator in da house, yo, indeed. #design
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
And they keep the good guys safe and the bad guys can keep watching the sky. #design
11/10/09
11/11/09
Terrorists are certainly jerks, but they face men eye to eye all the time.
-Kle. #design
11/10/09
Sure it might have problems with identifying who is surrendering or not and its indiscriminate use of force, but it will inadvertently make the wait times for border crossing so much easier. #design
11/09/09
11/09/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/09/09
11/09/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09