San Francisco, 3:18 PM
Sun Dec 6
13 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |
Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |
I like the idea of reboots and remakes because I end up watching the original anyway. Plus, the concepts of remakes isn't really new. How many movies have been made into musicals? How many books or plays have been made into movies? To me, it's the same principle.
What offends me, however, is when remakes are done but adds nothing to the canon or worse, screws it up.
There is no such thing as an "original idea". The human race has been around for 40'000 years and we've been retelling the same stories to each other under different names for all that time. Even supposedly new stories are simply re-workings of a handful of basic ideas. When "Star Wars" was new it was just a re-working of ancient mythic archetypes in the guise of space opera. What is Star Trek but a re-working of a thousand tales of sailors encountering weird and exotic cultures on uncharted islands draped in the trappings of the space age? The best we can ever hope for is new ways to retell the same old myths.
The success of certain reboots is perhaps due to the fact that certain stories such as Star Trek, Dr. Who, Batlestar Galactica, and Batman are particularly successful at retelling those old stories in a way that fits well with contemporary culture. Who is Kirk but Odysseus of the space age? What is Battlestar Galactica but Exodus with rocket ships?
@Ronnoc: The Ten Commandments is a remake. Romeo and Juliet (the play) is a remake. Most of the Greek Tragedies are remake. Every myth are remake. Fairie tales are remake. Even the Bible is a remake. Resistance is futile
@Bill-Lee: A reductivist argument. You have valid points, but it's also a gross oversimplification on the level of "no one 'needs' anything."
Need, of course, is a conditional statement. Do I need to breathe? No. Do I need to breathe in order to live? Yes. Do I need money? No. Do I need money to pay my rent? Yes. And so on...
So, in saying there is no such thing as an "original idea," you are right on one level. Every element of every story can be found in the stories that came before. Just like every art movement is built upon what came before it. One must have still lifes before one can have impressionism.
Having said that, Star Wars is not original. Hero beats bad guy. The end. Not much original about that. You can expound upon it, bring in the monomyth structure, references to Akira Kurosawa films & space serials, and it would still be considered a derivative work, from a point of view.
However, Star Wars is unique in how these ideas were brought together, how they were presented, as can easily be seen by the reaction of movie goers & the film industry in general. If Star Wars were truly unoriginal, it would have had no effect on movie making on any level.
Is it telling the same story we've seen before? From a non-conditional point of view, yes. Is it a story that the world has seen before? Honestly, from a conditional point of view, which is how we treat the world outside of art critique, no. No one had seen anything truly like Star Wars before.
@Paul_Is_Drunk: A writing teacher of one of my friends once told his class that every writer is essentially writing the same story in different ways. There is always a running theme or recurring device in a writers concepts, it's just spun around in different ways. This is storytelling. Technically it's true, there are no original ideas, but it is the job of the writer to take this purloined, used, ragged, dusty idea, dust it off, spit & shine it and make it different and new. What were all the Star Trek franchises but re-workings of TOS stories, and what were TOS stories but re-workings of stories that were blasts from the past, or even inspired from completely different shows like The Twilight Zone?
Writing is like cooking. A different spice will change the flavor of the piece every time.
Aw, the little toaster is so cute and I have one just like it on my counter. Wait, does that mean I am in my own small way contributing to the destruction of all mankind? What now...I will not give up my morning toast!
@tetracycloide: well we are hard wired to reconize the form of a woman and turn it into boner fuel. thats why mud flaps cause awkward family road trips.
@tetracycloide: I am as queer as a two dollar bill and find #6 quite alluring. Total credit goes to Tricia Helfer who grew into one hell of an actress right before our eyes.
@Jason Moreland-Basconcillo: I think that the saying is queer as a three dollar bill, unless you're trying to say you're a bit different, but still get seen on occasion.
Neon Genesis Evangelion. The damn writers/producers couldn't think of a way to end that train wreck except by killing off the whole damn cast. They should have just ended it with Kaworu Nagisa and success of the Human Instrumentality Project....if not sooner.
@Vulcan Has No Moon: I liked the ending for one simple fact: I hated every last character on the show. Oh I was enthralled by it and couldn't stop watching it until I'd seen every last scrap of the shows and movies but, they seemed to be great examples of humanities selfishness and propensity to destroy itself. On the one hand I hated Shinji's father but also couldn't stand Shinji's whining.
@Alvarez: Actually, I don't really care they killed everyone, just that it seemed like they had run into a brick wall with the story and took an easy out. Like they never planned the story arc out to the end. It's like the writers got together and said, "Show got cancelled, and we've got an hour to rap this up. Any ideas on how to tie up all the loose ends?" "Let's just kill everyone off." "Cool!" and then everyone knocked off early for lunch.
@Wookie1972:
Then so was Wagner's Ring and the whole Nibelungenlied. And, of course, Puccini.
How about The House of Atreus? And the Oedipus cycle?
I'm gonna do my PhD dissertation: Buffy As A Universal Human Archetype
@firstofnormalin: Well, those were real operas, soap or not. Except for Oedipus. (although Oedipis, with its use of hidden parentage, would obviously count)
@Wookie1972:
Well, I'll grant most weren't _sf_ soaps, but look at Wagner's Ring--dwarves (maybe even dwarfs), dragons with magic blood, hero screws his sister, magic swords, magic gold rings, tarnhelms for invisibility, Rinemadens living under the river...if that ain't a fantasy/soap opera combo, I'll eat my Furtwangler CDs.
03:13 PM
01:52 PM
What offends me, however, is when remakes are done but adds nothing to the canon or worse, screws it up.
12:42 PM
The success of certain reboots is perhaps due to the fact that certain stories such as Star Trek, Dr. Who, Batlestar Galactica, and Batman are particularly successful at retelling those old stories in a way that fits well with contemporary culture. Who is Kirk but Odysseus of the space age? What is Battlestar Galactica but Exodus with rocket ships?
12:52 PM
01:02 PM
01:12 PM
Need, of course, is a conditional statement. Do I need to breathe? No. Do I need to breathe in order to live? Yes. Do I need money? No. Do I need money to pay my rent? Yes. And so on...
So, in saying there is no such thing as an "original idea," you are right on one level. Every element of every story can be found in the stories that came before. Just like every art movement is built upon what came before it. One must have still lifes before one can have impressionism.
Having said that, Star Wars is not original. Hero beats bad guy. The end. Not much original about that. You can expound upon it, bring in the monomyth structure, references to Akira Kurosawa films & space serials, and it would still be considered a derivative work, from a point of view.
However, Star Wars is unique in how these ideas were brought together, how they were presented, as can easily be seen by the reaction of movie goers & the film industry in general. If Star Wars were truly unoriginal, it would have had no effect on movie making on any level.
Is it telling the same story we've seen before? From a non-conditional point of view, yes. Is it a story that the world has seen before? Honestly, from a conditional point of view, which is how we treat the world outside of art critique, no. No one had seen anything truly like Star Wars before.
03:07 PM
Writing is like cooking. A different spice will change the flavor of the piece every time.
12:37 PM
Then very terrified.
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
The monolith must have been working double-time that year.
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
Ah, Number Six, what wonderful things you do to my mind.
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
This was intended for edification and humor.
11/26/09
11/28/09
11/28/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/26/09
11/26/09
Then so was Wagner's Ring and the whole Nibelungenlied. And, of course, Puccini.
How about The House of Atreus? And the Oedipus cycle?
I'm gonna do my PhD dissertation: Buffy As A Universal Human Archetype
11/26/09
11/27/09
Well, I'll grant most weren't _sf_ soaps, but look at Wagner's Ring--dwarves (maybe even dwarfs), dragons with magic blood, hero screws his sister, magic swords, magic gold rings, tarnhelms for invisibility, Rinemadens living under the river...if that ain't a fantasy/soap opera combo, I'll eat my Furtwangler CDs.
11/25/09
11/25/09