I wonder what gravity will turn out to be. Personally, I go with the Gravigremlins playing tug-of-war. Read all about in my paper in Science, right after established science finally admits its cowardice and bows to my brilliance.
I'm still dubious about gravity waves. I understand that if they exist, they're very weak (and tough to detect), but the notion of gravity being anything other than a force resulting from a distortion in spacetime is hard for me to swallow.
What's funny is that I remember the whole theory of gravity being a depression or indent in the fabric of space-time from a Calvin and Hobbes comic more than any physics class.
@nonpareil: I've had the same struggle with the concept. My mental model is that the distortion in space time propagates at the speed of light, but I can't quite come to grips with a "wave like nature" for it. But I really like the idea of generating gravity waves 180 degrees out of phase, using something akin to Bose Gravity Cancelling Mass Phones.
@Doctor Who?: Interestingly, noise in the gravity wave detection experiment GEO600 corresponds well to a prediction for a holographic universe. I'm not sure whether this story was reported in io9. here's one related link:
http://www.npl.washington.edu/AV/altvw145.html
As an aside, the new commenting system doesn't seem to work for me in IE8, though it's ok in Firefox and Opera.
@Log1c: If what I recall from early physics classes is correct, gravity waves are more analogous to electromagnetic waves as a consequence of moving electric charge.
@Log1c: That still leaves me wondering about the nature of the medium those waves propagate through... My physics knowledge is admittedly only passing, but exactly what is space-time anyway?
@Mathmos: That makes complete sense, when you consider how a 'complete' theory of gravity would work with the Higg's Boson and etc etc... so particle interaction in electromagnetic terms (ie without a transmission medium) is pretty solid.
@nonpareil: I think planets and stars basically make "holes" in space - kind of like the holes in swiss cheese. But the matter does cause a distortion in the space, like the planet/star "pushes space out of the way" so it can exist there. That distortion is actually compressed space, so an object falling into a gravitational field is really just falling into a part of space that has been made "smaller" because the planet or star is pushing that "space" out of its way so it can exist. The space around it isn't really "smaller" per se, its just more space squished into a smaller area - so the object falling into it is just traveling through more space faster and will likely collide with the planet/star because the gravity (or compressed space) is greater closest to the surface. You would think the compressed space would have a repellent effect, but I guess we would have to know what space is made out of (Dark Matter) to answer that. Dark Matter will probably answer a lot about gravity.
07/09/09
DOES NO ONE NOTICE THE FIERY EYES OF THE EVIL DEMIURGE?!
(...okay, don't panic...don't panic...)
AHHHhhhhhh......!
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
Plus, their analogy makes sense. I should probably do more reading on this at some point, though.
07/09/09
What's funny is that I remember the whole theory of gravity being a depression or indent in the fabric of space-time from a Calvin and Hobbes comic more than any physics class.
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
http://www.npl.washington.edu/AV/altvw145.html
As an aside, the new commenting system doesn't seem to work for me in IE8, though it's ok in Firefox and Opera.
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
A simple matter is that my current position (arbitrarily) is 100ft, -93ft, 25ft at t = 5:17:23... or in vector form [100 -93 25 5:17:23]...
07/10/09