San Francisco, 7:43 AM
Wed Dec 16
25 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |
Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |
THE SEPARATION by Christopher Priest is the best SF book of the decade, to my mind. Its complex use of real history, alternate history, parallel worlds and human consciousness is simply fascinating.
Mieville I can get behind. Stephenson I'm torn on, as whilst the Baroque Cycle has SF elements, overall it is a historical fiction with a high amount of historical fidelity (moreso than most straight historical works).
ASH: A SECRET HISTORY by Mary Gentle should also be a contender for the list. As an alt-history with magic and an interesting language style, I would rank it as superior to JONATHAN STRANGE AND MR. NORRELL.
For fantasy I think we do need A STORM OF SWORDS on there. A book with so many memorable moments, characters and lines that it's almost overwhelming, along with at least two of the most jaw-dropping "Are you kidding me?" moments in modern fantasy fiction. Probably the moment that post-Tolkien secondary world fantasy stopped aping the old master and finally said, "Right, now things are going to be little bit different," and followed up on in style by the likes of Bakker, Abercrombie and Lynch.
For fantasy of a slightly different stripe, Steven Erikson's DEADHOUSE GATES and MEMORIES OF ICE are pretty impressive works, constantly imaginative and thought-provoking. Later books in the series have proved disappointing, even formulaic, but these two books remain very impressive.
Alastair Reynolds, for me, would be a strong contender for individual best SF writer of the decade. Individual works by other writers have been better than any of his output, but his high rate of output (nine novels and three story collections this decade alone) and its very high quality should be respected. CHASM CITY and PUSHING ICE are classic works of modern SF in their own right.
Ian McDonald's RIVER OF GODS and BRASYL are also very good, and refreshingly show that the future won't just be set in Los Angeles and New York, but that countries like India and Brazil have dazzling, high-tech futures and dangers to deal with as well.
Thanks for the great list Annalee! More book articles please - look how many comments this has generated. I look forward to reading the new books on my must read list.
Will there be another book club selection soon? I was without computer recently so I may have missed an announcement.
I wanted to like the Baroque Cycle, but it was too... baroque (And I adore 17th-century history).
Whereas "Anathem", I zipped through in a ridiculously short amount of time, considering how big it is. I wasn't confused about the plot or the characters once.
This list: not enough pew pew. j/k, but there's an awful lot of fantasy here.
Lists are always fun to see! I've read a quarter of the books you've got listed here and am working on the sixth (Oryx & Crake). It was fun seeing your decade picks, thanks! :)
Wow, there's so much on here I've never heard of. I read Harry Potter on my own and "Tower of Babylon" from Ted Chiang's Stories of Your Life And Others for my science fiction literature class (taught by John Kessel, if you've heard of him), both of which I enjoyed, but for different reasons.
Next time I'm looking for a good science fiction book, I know where to turn.
@Platypus Man: You make me want to go back to university! Science Fiction Literature classes were not available in my day. Time to win the damn lottery and go back to school.
Despite it's recent release, Paolo Bacigalupi's the Windup Girl should be here. A couple others that are worthy would be Altered Carbon and The Lies of Locke Lamora.
Some books I really agree with on that, and of course some I think should have been included. I would have liked to have seen some Scalzi in there, or maybe something else from the young adult genre than Harry Potter- Hunger Games or the Uglies series would be a good choice there.
I do think that this list needs Blindsight, which is the best sci-fi novel I have read this decade.
It's not the most accessible- even though the main characters are, arguably, human, in practice they're fantastically alien beings. There's no comfortable or familiar point of view to follow the plot from.
@amygdala: I'll third it. Blindsight was one of those books that reminded me why I read SF.
I'll alo throw in a recommendation for The Yiddish Policeman's Union. Genre bending at its best.
@dustyr: I would also include the two McSweeney's collections edited by Chabon, Mammoth Treasury Of Thrilling Tales and Enchanted Chamber Of Astonishing Stories. The first one is worth it just for Rick Moody's "The Albertine Notes," a brilliant PKD pastiche.
@Dr Emilio Lizardo: Back in high school (that terrible terrible period in my life I think of as "the dark times", which is to say: pretty much like everyone here's high school experience) I averaged two books a day. Then again, the books I read were a lot lighter weight than what I would spend the rest of my life reading. That's probably true for you too.
I've read that the more education you have the slower your reading speed (in general), because you end up training your brain to read very carefully for dense technical content, and it's difficult to get out of that mode. That was certainly my experience once I got out of graduate school. That may be true for you too.
Now I read about a book every two weeks or so, even though I discipline myself to make time to read nearly every morning (when, being very old, my mind is at its most alert).
So I guess my short comment is: don't beat yourself up for not reading enough. Just find joy in the fact that you love to read.
If having the Baroque Cycle precludes having Anathem listed, I'm going to have to bite the bullet and include the latter rather than the former. Oh the horror. It burns!
I'm a bit surprised "The Name of the Wind" didn't make it. For anyone who's read both that and "Acacia", could you provide a couple sentences' comparison?
Truthfully, although it's a terrible thing to contemplate, I'd be in favor of a project by io9 of a long and wide scope to define some genres. Not empirically, but for the purpose of this site specifically. I understand this may be impossible, but ending up with a list like this, it certainly would help.
@Lassus: I've read most of these, but I haven't read The Baroque Cycle nor ANATHEM (although both are sitting on the huge stack of books in my office at home that are threatening to collapse 2012-like at any time). But since CRYPTONOMICON is one of my favorite books in any genre of all time, I'd have to make that my Neal Stephenson choice. I talked about it so passionately at the lunch table that most of my lunch buddies read it, then they too raved about it, driving the non-reading minority at the table crazy. Ahhhh, good times.
@RavenNemain: I had to force myself to the end of Time Traveler, too. I honestly couldn't figure out all the hype. As I read, I kept feeling like she was trying to impress me with her knowledge of music and art etc. But the story, ugh, sloooooow.
12/14/09
Mieville I can get behind. Stephenson I'm torn on, as whilst the Baroque Cycle has SF elements, overall it is a historical fiction with a high amount of historical fidelity (moreso than most straight historical works).
ASH: A SECRET HISTORY by Mary Gentle should also be a contender for the list. As an alt-history with magic and an interesting language style, I would rank it as superior to JONATHAN STRANGE AND MR. NORRELL.
For fantasy I think we do need A STORM OF SWORDS on there. A book with so many memorable moments, characters and lines that it's almost overwhelming, along with at least two of the most jaw-dropping "Are you kidding me?" moments in modern fantasy fiction. Probably the moment that post-Tolkien secondary world fantasy stopped aping the old master and finally said, "Right, now things are going to be little bit different," and followed up on in style by the likes of Bakker, Abercrombie and Lynch.
For fantasy of a slightly different stripe, Steven Erikson's DEADHOUSE GATES and MEMORIES OF ICE are pretty impressive works, constantly imaginative and thought-provoking. Later books in the series have proved disappointing, even formulaic, but these two books remain very impressive.
Alastair Reynolds, for me, would be a strong contender for individual best SF writer of the decade. Individual works by other writers have been better than any of his output, but his high rate of output (nine novels and three story collections this decade alone) and its very high quality should be respected. CHASM CITY and PUSHING ICE are classic works of modern SF in their own right.
Ian McDonald's RIVER OF GODS and BRASYL are also very good, and refreshingly show that the future won't just be set in Los Angeles and New York, but that countries like India and Brazil have dazzling, high-tech futures and dangers to deal with as well.
12/12/09
Will there be another book club selection soon? I was without computer recently so I may have missed an announcement.
12/12/09
12/12/09
Whereas "Anathem", I zipped through in a ridiculously short amount of time, considering how big it is. I wasn't confused about the plot or the characters once.
This list: not enough pew pew. j/k, but there's an awful lot of fantasy here.
12/14/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/13/09
12/13/09
12/13/09
Regardless...yeah, fantastic Sci-Fi. His followup book Starquake was also fabulous.
12/12/09
Next time I'm looking for a good science fiction book, I know where to turn.
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
It's not the most accessible- even though the main characters are, arguably, human, in practice they're fantastically alien beings. There's no comfortable or familiar point of view to follow the plot from.
12/12/09
More than any other novel I've read recently (even Glasshouse), Blindsight gets inside your head and twists things around. Awesome, if not accessible.
12/12/09
12/12/09
I'll alo throw in a recommendation for The Yiddish Policeman's Union. Genre bending at its best.
12/13/09
12/12/09
I need to retire so I can go back to the two-books-a-week I read in school.
12/12/09
I've read that the more education you have the slower your reading speed (in general), because you end up training your brain to read very carefully for dense technical content, and it's difficult to get out of that mode. That was certainly my experience once I got out of graduate school. That may be true for you too.
Now I read about a book every two weeks or so, even though I discipline myself to make time to read nearly every morning (when, being very old, my mind is at its most alert).
So I guess my short comment is: don't beat yourself up for not reading enough. Just find joy in the fact that you love to read.
12/12/09
I'm a bit surprised "The Name of the Wind" didn't make it. For anyone who's read both that and "Acacia", could you provide a couple sentences' comparison?
Truthfully, although it's a terrible thing to contemplate, I'd be in favor of a project by io9 of a long and wide scope to define some genres. Not empirically, but for the purpose of this site specifically. I understand this may be impossible, but ending up with a list like this, it certainly would help.
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
But I agree with the people who are asking aboug Neil Gaiman - American Gods, Anansi Boys, The Graveyard Book... All excellent.
12/12/09