San Francisco, 11:30 AM
Tue Dec 22
27 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |
Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |
I agree with a good portion of this list, but no mention of Warren Ellis? For shame!
There may be other authors writing sci-fi comics, but few with quite as much love (sticky shameful perverted love) for Science . Within the past decade, he's given us:
Planetary - You'd be hard pressed to find another series anywhere more self-referential to the history of comics and sci-fi, spanning everything from Jules Verne, Tarzan, and Doc Savage to giant Tokyo monsters, The Fantastic 4, and the evolution of John Constantine into King Mob.
Global Frequency - Another great mostly-episodic series spanning all manner of sci-fi subjects, from killer cyborgs to memetic viruses.
Desolation Jones - Essentially Jerry Cornelius meets The Prisoner. Slightly less sci-fi than some of the other titles, but 'Y the Last Man' is up there, so I'm including it anyways.
Plus Ocean, Nextwave, New Universal, Doktor Sleepless, Ministry of Space, Ignition City, and probably several more that I'm forgetting.
I posted to much the same, damn shame there's no Ellis on here. But you did forget one important one (given when it ended) Transmetropolitan.
But I'd definitely agree that both Planetary and Global Frequency should have been contenders. Lets hope the Global Freq show turns out to be as good as the GN, because it is the perfect setup for an Outer Limits style show, and I cannot wait for it to get going.
Yeah Scott Pilgrim. I can't wait for Volume 6, but I don't have much hope for the movie, cause I don't think Micheal Cera can pull off being Scott Pilgrim...
@Scorpi: That being said, I think Cera can pull it off. As for getting a new face for it, I think it's wise to have someone with star power to help promoting the film.
@badSamurai: I think, like Bones, Batman counts as sci fi, for the purposes of this site :) Well, that and he's Batman. How can you argue with that, really?
@tamahome: I think it was a great comic, but it certainly had its issues. Like the setup. Friend Bruce has never mentioned or thought about before suddenly pops up, and we find out just how "close" they were? Dead/and/or/villain. Guaranteed.
At the risk of expressing an opinion that -maybe- many people here cannot (or do not want to) relate to -- but, aren't people tired of (or at least hungering for a change from) hyper- character-driven content - especially graphic novels??? I mean - didn't we all go through sympathetic, empathetic, and all other types of pathetic-driven lives in high school?? There's other literature formulae/structures/models out there.
Maybe it is because I travel a lot and i just don't get a chance to spend days getting to know a person intimately (in the learning-their-life-story-type of way) but what about the exploration of a culture, setting, and just getting into the deep-weirdness of a new place. Perhaps the majority of new writers (and maybe now readers) just don't have the skills/experiences to really world-build (or embrace it) and thus immerse oneself in truly exotic settings, cultures -- because maybe they did not think (or cannot-afford) traveling as an important part of their development? who knows? The same with science. I know this has been bandied around a bit - but its comparably easy - in the sense that a lot of people do it (not that it doesn't take years of experience to attain a certain level of expertise) - to make up compelling characters and place them over/within a mediocre, somewhat-underdeveloped setting/time-place. It almost feels like you can just substitute the space station interior for the fourth planet from Alpha Prime for the New York city of 2131 for the downtown of Tokyo of 20 years ago, with only minor sub-details. The setting doesn't seem to come alive -and worse, does not make a difference to the way the characters act. Maybe one could argue that people need something they can relate to so they can really get into a story - like a real-life character -- maybe -- but we're scifi people and we thrive on weird, we prosper in fringe, we eschew comfort, we reject the mundane and typical and everyday in our 'escape' scifi, ne? Perhaps character-driven content comes out as being more polished and literary? Perhaps the desire to have a larger audience and thus make us seem that we're more accepted drives the desire to 'put up' with this type of content. This may end up to be a wider criticism of scifi as a genre, but... wow, the epic is dead or maybe just like authentic scifi (whatever that means), it still continues to exist in the outliers of mainstream, avoiding bigscreen features and New York bestseller lists.. well at least having the internet helps me find them.. so few as there are.
Wow, two Grant Morrison nods but Brubaker, Ellis and Kirkman get snubbed? Atleast Mark Millar was omitted.
Pluto, Planetes, Y: The Last Man definately belong up there.
Warren Ellis' run on Thunderbolts, Kirkman's Invcible (Walking Dead is better SciFi material but Invicible mixes things up more,) Matt Fraction's Invincible Iron Man, The Umbrella Academy, Ed Brubaker's Sleeper along with Brubaker and Fraction's run on Immortal Iron Fist just off the top of my head were my favorite reads of the last 10 years.
They're not technically from this decade, so this isn't one of those "how could you omit ___???" complaints, but I want to give a shout out to the recent Drawn & Quarterly reissues of the 60s/70s work of Yoshihiro Tatsumi. You'll want to lock away the razor blades when reading his bleak depictions of urban big-city life in Japan, but his stories are just stunning.
this article would be much better if it was made like the book article recently published on i09, with synopsis and pictures...and maybe reasoning behind them....wow this article wasnt very well thought out ;)
@SnehalMarten: I didn't read SCOTT PILGRIM until this past summer. While it's certainly not great, and probably my least favorite Oni Press comic ever, I can understand the appeal.
I need to go back and give Y the LAST MAN another try. A friend of mine who owns a comic shop asked me to read the first trade, and I'm not sure if I ever finished it. Something about it didn't jive, and I was never able to put my finger on it.
@Bill-Lee: Not to mention, it is essentially one man's choices from all the material he read in that time.
I would like to see a graphic novel about a futuristic world where we all acknowledge we have different tastes and don't waste our time bickering over what other's like (or should like). That would be a neat world.
12/15/09
12/14/09
There may be other authors writing sci-fi comics, but few with quite as much love (sticky shameful perverted love) for Science . Within the past decade, he's given us:
Planetary - You'd be hard pressed to find another series anywhere more self-referential to the history of comics and sci-fi, spanning everything from Jules Verne, Tarzan, and Doc Savage to giant Tokyo monsters, The Fantastic 4, and the evolution of John Constantine into King Mob.
Global Frequency - Another great mostly-episodic series spanning all manner of sci-fi subjects, from killer cyborgs to memetic viruses.
Desolation Jones - Essentially Jerry Cornelius meets The Prisoner. Slightly less sci-fi than some of the other titles, but 'Y the Last Man' is up there, so I'm including it anyways.
Plus Ocean, Nextwave, New Universal, Doktor Sleepless, Ministry of Space, Ignition City, and probably several more that I'm forgetting.
12/14/09
I posted to much the same, damn shame there's no Ellis on here. But you did forget one important one (given when it ended) Transmetropolitan.
But I'd definitely agree that both Planetary and Global Frequency should have been contenders. Lets hope the Global Freq show turns out to be as good as the GN, because it is the perfect setup for an Outer Limits style show, and I cannot wait for it to get going.
12/13/09
12/13/09
12/13/09
12/13/09
12/13/09
12/13/09
12/13/09
[END SARCASTIC TRANSMISSION]
12/12/09
12/12/09
Someone dismissed Batman Year 100, but I liked it.
12/13/09
Does Batman RIP count as Sci Fi?
and Mr. Morrison already has 2 books on the list.
IHMO All Star Superman was probably the best overall cape comic of the decade. Just Amazing.
12/13/09
12/13/09
12/13/09
12/13/09
12/12/09
Maybe it is because I travel a lot and i just don't get a chance to spend days getting to know a person intimately (in the learning-their-life-story-type of way) but what about the exploration of a culture, setting, and just getting into the deep-weirdness of a new place. Perhaps the majority of new writers (and maybe now readers) just don't have the skills/experiences to really world-build (or embrace it) and thus immerse oneself in truly exotic settings, cultures -- because maybe they did not think (or cannot-afford) traveling as an important part of their development? who knows? The same with science. I know this has been bandied around a bit - but its comparably easy - in the sense that a lot of people do it (not that it doesn't take years of experience to attain a certain level of expertise) - to make up compelling characters and place them over/within a mediocre, somewhat-underdeveloped setting/time-place. It almost feels like you can just substitute the space station interior for the fourth planet from Alpha Prime for the New York city of 2131 for the downtown of Tokyo of 20 years ago, with only minor sub-details. The setting doesn't seem to come alive -and worse, does not make a difference to the way the characters act. Maybe one could argue that people need something they can relate to so they can really get into a story - like a real-life character -- maybe -- but we're scifi people and we thrive on weird, we prosper in fringe, we eschew comfort, we reject the mundane and typical and everyday in our 'escape' scifi, ne? Perhaps character-driven content comes out as being more polished and literary? Perhaps the desire to have a larger audience and thus make us seem that we're more accepted drives the desire to 'put up' with this type of content. This may end up to be a wider criticism of scifi as a genre, but... wow, the epic is dead or maybe just like authentic scifi (whatever that means), it still continues to exist in the outliers of mainstream, avoiding bigscreen features and New York bestseller lists.. well at least having the internet helps me find them.. so few as there are.
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/13/09
12/13/09
12/13/09
12/13/09
12/13/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/12/09
Pluto, Planetes, Y: The Last Man definately belong up there.
Warren Ellis' run on Thunderbolts, Kirkman's Invcible (Walking Dead is better SciFi material but Invicible mixes things up more,) Matt Fraction's Invincible Iron Man, The Umbrella Academy, Ed Brubaker's Sleeper along with Brubaker and Fraction's run on Immortal Iron Fist just off the top of my head were my favorite reads of the last 10 years.
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/13/09
12/12/09
Why can't they all be that good?
12/12/09
12/12/09
Hell, that first issue of Ultimates is probably the single most cinematic comics I've read in years.
12/12/09
Same with Scott Pilgrim.
Y the Last Man was also boring. Ex Machina would be a much better choice from that same author.
12/12/09
I need to go back and give Y the LAST MAN another try. A friend of mine who owns a comic shop asked me to read the first trade, and I'm not sure if I ever finished it. Something about it didn't jive, and I was never able to put my finger on it.
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/13/09
I would like to see a graphic novel about a futuristic world where we all acknowledge we have different tastes and don't waste our time bickering over what other's like (or should like). That would be a neat world.