<![CDATA[io9: charles darwin]]> http://tags.lifehacker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/io9.com.png <![CDATA[io9: charles darwin]]> http://io9.com/tag/charlesdarwin http://io9.com/tag/charlesdarwin <![CDATA[Darwin's Evolutionary Doubt Fills An Hour Of PBS]]> What happened in the year to Charles Darwin before the publication of "On the Origin of Species"? According to PBS, all manner of bad things, and it's something they've enlisted Lost's Desmond to help tell you all about it.

Darwin's Darkest Hour is the name of a new television movie created by National Geographic for PBS, starring Lost's Henry Ian Cusick as the famous evolutionary scientist, depicting what PBS are calling the "professional and personal traumas" he endured in the year before the publication of his famous book. According to National Geographic president Michael Rosenfeld, the movie exists to make Darwin more understandable to laypeople... both personally and professionally or, as he puts it:

[Making Darwin's] vulnerabilities while also making his great insights understandable.

The movie will premiere on PBS on October 6th.

PBS airs 'Darwin's' story [Variety]

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5321636&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[A New Explanation for the Way Humans Evolved from Apes]]> It's Charles Darwin's 200th birthday, and we still don't know why humans and chimps share 99 percent of their DNA, yet are such different animals. A new study published today advances a weird new theory.

A group of researchers at the University of Washington have discovered that there is one area where human and ape DNA mutated very rapidly during the time that they were diverging on the evolutionary tree. Both species' genomes mutated a great deal in areas where there are a lot of repeat sequences of DNA. Humans, like most creatures, have areas of their genome where the same chunk of genetic code is repeated once or several times.

According to the University of Washington, lead researchers Tomas Marques-Bonet and Jeffrey M. Kidd said:

The new study shows big differences in the genomes of humans and great apes within duplicated sequences containing rapidly evolving genes. Most of these differences occurred at a time just prior to the speciation of chimpanzee, gorilla, and humans.

So is it possible that the reasons for such dramatic differences between human and chimp can be traced back to these quickly-mutating repeat regions?

According to the University of Washington:

Chimps and people share almost 99 percent of the non-duplicated sequences of their genomes; their proteins are virtually identical; and there are very few rearrangements that distinguish ape-human chromosomes. In contrast, the researchers noted that the duplicated sequences show much more variation than the other portions of the genetic code.

But this is such a new area of research that we need to be cautious before drawing any firm conclusions. While this looks like a promising avenue for further inquiry, the researchers explained:

There is still no final answer as to why chimps and humans are different. Maybe segmental duplications that are specific to humans are another layer to explore, or maybe the distinction between human and chimps is not found in these genetic differences. What is certain is that genetic differences contribute significantly to what makes a human and chimp different, and we know that these regions of our genetic code are changing much more rapidly than most others. The next challenge will be making sense of all these differences and the genes that are affected by them.

While previous studies have suggested that we will learn more about ourselves by studying so-called junk DNA, or DNA that doesn't seem actively involved in coding for proteins. But this new work suggests we study the parts of our genetic code that repeat themselves. These odd, repeated segments of our DNA may be the key to understanding why we mutated into the hairless, neurotic hominids we are, instead of turning into happy-go-lucky bonobos.

SOURCES:

University of Washington

Nature

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5151804&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Was Darwin The Spicoli Of His Times?]]> Jennifer Connelly and Paul Bettany are cast as married couple in Jon Amiel's biopic Creation about the life of Charles Darwin. Bettany will won't be donning much of the evolutionary theorist's mighty beard, because this picture promises to show us the life of a young Darwin, and his struggles. THR claims, "The scientist finds himself caught in a struggle between faith and reason, love and truth." I'm all for anything that shows "crazy" Darwin hot rodding around town smoking cigarettes and chasing skirts. But what kind of man was he in his youth, was he a Spicoli, a Bueller or a Dean, and can he out do the Kinsey movie? [The Hollywood Reporter]

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5045677&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[What The League Of Extraordinary Gentlemen Movie Could Have Been]]> The film version of Alan Moore's graphic novel The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen is probably the worst movie adaptation of all time. It failed to capture the spirit of the graphic novel, didn't stay true to the characters, and devolved into just another vehicle for Sean Connery. But take heart. Check out this trailer for Tarsem Singh's The Fall, which is everything League could have been. The flick has been playing all over the world, and will finally be coming to the U.S. in March.

The Fall unites an unlikely band of steampunk-era heroes — The Indian, The Ex-Slave, The Explosives Expert, The Masked Bandit, and Charles Darwin — to fight a common enemy, Governor Odious. Director Tarsem is best known for his movie The Cell, which was gorgeous eye-candy with a story that dragged. He's also been attached to the remake of Westworld and Nautica, but was either replaced or left those projects. The Fall was shown at the Toronto International Film Festival in 2006, and has taken its sweet time to make its way around the world.

It looks to be equal parts Big Fish and Pan's Labyrinth as well as The League. That's a good start. Plus, Charles Darwin as a fictional science hero? We're there.

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=361070&view=rss&microfeed=true