My personal favorite is the story "Why I Left Harry's All-night Hamburgers," by Lawrence Watt-Evans. Look it up if you're not familiar. It's a different take on the concept than most.
The Star Trek 2009 Movie "parallel timeline" is mentioned and the article also says "the new Movie-Earth lines up so well with Mirror-Earth and OriginalSeries-Earth that it's really only a matter of time before some comic or novel seeks to cross them all over"...
Is that now the most popular theory in Star Trek fandom, that there are three different universes describing 1. ST:ENT/ST:TOS/ST:TNG/ST:DS9/ST:VOY 2. ST:ENT/ST:2009movie 3. the Mirror episodes (OriginalSeries-Earth, Movie-Earth, Mirror-Earth or whatever they are called)?
If it is a "parallel timeline" does Star Trek fandom also accept it as a "parallel universe"?
What about ST:TNG Yesterday's Enterprise - that's a different kind of time travel from the Star Trek 2009 Movie?
@John Nor: Considering TNG doesn't keep continuity with TOS (exhibit A: Zephram/Zefram Cochrane's birth planet, exhibit B: KHAAAAN), I'd make it at least 4.
"Even before most people had heard of Erwin Schrödinger, we knew that there were plenty other Earths out there..."
First, the immediate examples given after this statement all post-date Schrödinger(1887-1961). Schrödinger postulated his happy happy cat in 1935. There are examples of multiverse stories that do indeed predate Schrödinger, the various "fairy world" stories would count but they're more fantasy than science fiction (albeit, one man's magick is another's technology and demons are just really powerful nasties from another dimension). Second, uh, most people still haven't heard of Schrödinger. :-)
Additions to the mix . . . Roger Zelazny's Amber series or Keith Laumer's Imperium or H. Beam Piper's Paratime Police . . . ad infinitim.
@Azogue: Perhaps the first use of the idea of fictions creating alternate universes was by De Camp and Pratt. Their characters travelled between worlds by changing their mental axioms and visited the worlds of Norse, Irish and Finnish myth, Orlando Furioso, The Faerie Queen, Coleridge's Xanadu and I'm sure others, (not in that order).
06/07/09
06/07/09
06/07/09
Is that now the most popular theory in Star Trek fandom, that there are three different universes describing
1. ST:ENT/ST:TOS/ST:TNG/ST:DS9/ST:VOY
2. ST:ENT/ST:2009movie
3. the Mirror episodes
(OriginalSeries-Earth, Movie-Earth, Mirror-Earth or whatever they are called)?
If it is a "parallel timeline" does Star Trek fandom also accept it as a "parallel universe"?
What about ST:TNG Yesterday's Enterprise - that's a different kind of time travel from the Star Trek 2009 Movie?
06/07/09
06/06/09
06/06/09
06/06/09
Still, love your commenter name!
06/06/09
First, the immediate examples given after this statement all post-date Schrödinger(1887-1961). Schrödinger postulated his happy happy cat in 1935. There are examples of multiverse stories that do indeed predate Schrödinger, the various "fairy world" stories would count but they're more fantasy than science fiction (albeit, one man's magick is another's technology and demons are just really powerful nasties from another dimension). Second, uh, most people still haven't heard of Schrödinger. :-)
Additions to the mix . . . Roger Zelazny's Amber series or Keith Laumer's Imperium or H. Beam Piper's Paratime Police . . . ad infinitim.
06/06/09
06/06/09
06/06/09
I especially enjoy his concept of "fictons"; units of imagination, that if widely shared create a parallel universe.
Thus his characters visit the Lensman, Dejah Thoris and Oz. Best start off points: "The Number of the Beast" or "The Cat Who Walked Through Walls."
Love that stuff.
06/06/09
06/06/09
06/06/09
06/06/09
Unless of course my TiVo got them from an alternate universe. In which case it better be finding me Firefly seasons 2-5.