San Francisco, 4:52 AM
Sun Dec 6
12 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |
Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |
@Garrison Dean: R.O.A.C.H.: Well for me the business model needs to change. For low budget productions, say people do the film for free with a contract saying you get a percentage of the profits.
Imagine how much the actors in "Blair Witch" would have made if they had been promised a piece of the action.
I personally think it's going to happen more and more. I mean you can start making movies with as little as two thousand dollar investment (for a camera, editing software and computer. even cheaper if you skimp a little.)
@Garrison Dean: R.O.A.C.H.: I can make Siddhartha for free! And the actors better not fucking complain, cuz they shouldn't be attached to material goods anyway.
I guess it does depend on who's willing to sacrifice for their art.
@alphanumeric1971: A noble idea however it would never make it past the distribution stage because no producer will buy a film if they know they have to pay out percentages to the actors who worked on it down the line.
05/28/09
05/28/09
05/28/09
Imagine how much the actors in "Blair Witch" would have made if they had been promised a piece of the action.
I personally think it's going to happen more and more. I mean you can start making movies with as little as two thousand dollar investment (for a camera, editing software and computer. even cheaper if you skimp a little.)
05/28/09
I guess it does depend on who's willing to sacrifice for their art.
05/28/09
05/28/09