The Reaper may be unmanned, but a jet it's not. It's basically a beefed-up predator with hard points for weapons like missiles and other forms of high-tech mayhem.
@Pope John Peeps II: He's (most likely) referring to the ambiguity of "wedding" in extremist Islamic groups. It can mean a real wedding or a suicide bomber going to Allah to get his virgin brides.
Periodically, intelligence groups will misinterpret the reference and a real wedding will get bombed.
Your mistake is forgiven as it included a reference from the the greater Nerd Kingdom.
@Pope John Peeps II: It's okay here because you are among your own kind, other losers who understand Gundam references or any other obscure anime/scifi/comic/etc comment that a person of normal societal status would scratch their head and said "What wedding?"
@nathanst: Aah I was totally unaware of that meaning. How amazingly interesting. And by interesting, I mean horribly creepy in a way that makes me really skeeved out by Middle Eastern fanatic culture.
@Pope John Peeps II: Not that the Gundam reference wasn't appreciated, but I was referring to the trigger-happy propensity of Americans to bomb weddings, in part due to the reason nathanst mentioned.
Part of the problem of semi-automated/ remote weaponry is how easy it is to kill without connection to the consequences. Roboticized weapons need a convention now!
@Greasy Breakfast: Just so you're aware, no part of the firing of weapons on remote drones is automated. It's exactly the same as a pilot firing a weapon from a plane. Including that they have to ask clearance to fire on clearly identified targets.
@ThisDudeRufus: It still has a human pilot. It's not autonomous. When you tell your computer to save a file, it does it for you. That doesn't make it autonomous.
@ThisDudeRufus: As you say above They are not autonomous. Autonomous control would mean the vehicle could perform/execute mission under it's own control. That, is not the same as Auto-pilot. These thing are controlled by human operators remotely.
@Dr.Evil: Oh, yeah, I was just saying they can operate on their own for a while. If I had to bet what happened, they just lost remote control over it because the receiver broke or something.
I realize you want to make exciting headlines, but this sounds no different than when my remote controlled helicopter's receiver gets busted and it just keeps flying and won't take new orders;
what will be exciting is when a UAV drone CHOOSES to do something its not supposed to...simply "it kept flying in one direction and we couldn't stop it"...IS NOT like the situation in the film "Stealth"
NOR is "it attacked the wrong target...because its stupid and THOUGHT it was shooting the right vehicle but made an honest mistake because they look similar"
Even Asimov acknolwedged with the Three Laws that a major unstated exception is that "no robot has ever INTENTIONALLY harmed a human being"....there are of course accidents and mistakes, but motive is what's important.
@ChaDeBugre: what makes you say that? Reapers pretty much look like Predators, except I think they're bigger. How can you tell them apart, please? I need to know, it may be a matter of life and death once the machine uprising takes place.
@J_Frank_Parnell: Predator has a piston engine. Reaper has turbo prop, a larger wingspan and the tail is inverted from the predator. Other than that they look identical. Picture above is a Reaper.
Sounds like a scene from Stealth!!!! That said..I would have let it roam. Its probably the only sentient thing that knows where Osama is!!!!!!! It was probably on its way there!
@RavenNemain: Agreed. How do we know the flying deathbot wasn't on a mission of peace? He could have been on his way to the UN with an overture for harmony between robots and humans. Killing what we don't understand, this is just like the hairless sloth all over again . . .
On the other hand, I'm glad the US military had the good sense to nip this in the bud before it turned into Stealth. No one wants to see that happen.
09/18/09
09/18/09
the robot jet fighter plane thing
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
I'm such a loser. Kill me.
09/18/09
Periodically, intelligence groups will misinterpret the reference and a real wedding will get bombed.
Your mistake is forgiven as it included a reference from the the greater Nerd Kingdom.
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
Part of the problem of semi-automated/ remote weaponry is how easy it is to kill without connection to the consequences. Roboticized weapons need a convention now!
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
what will be exciting is when a UAV drone CHOOSES to do something its not supposed to...simply "it kept flying in one direction and we couldn't stop it"...IS NOT like the situation in the film "Stealth"
NOR is "it attacked the wrong target...because its stupid and THOUGHT it was shooting the right vehicle but made an honest mistake because they look similar"
Even Asimov acknolwedged with the Three Laws that a major unstated exception is that "no robot has ever INTENTIONALLY harmed a human being"....there are of course accidents and mistakes, but motive is what's important.
I see no motive here.
09/18/09
...sorry...
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
@J_Frank_Parnell: I am curious too. A quick search turned up this guy as a Reaper drone. Looks pretty close to me.
09/18/09
@Ruthless, If you let me: And one with the landing gears down for better comparison.
09/18/09
@Ruthless, If you let me: While this appears to be a Predator drone.
I am no expert, but it looks like Annalee got it right.
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
On the other hand, I'm glad the US military had the good sense to nip this in the bud before it turned into Stealth. No one wants to see that happen.
09/18/09
@#c15468750: curse our ignorant ways...
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
#@!
09/18/09
04/09/09
You know, the rubber mask set.
04/09/09
Yep, that's what we need, a bunch of teenagers and a semi-talking dog, they'd solve it all.