<![CDATA[io9: daleks]]> http://tags.lifehacker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/io9.com.png <![CDATA[io9: daleks]]> http://io9.com/tag/daleks http://io9.com/tag/daleks <![CDATA[R2D2's Secret Controller — Revealed!]]> Look who's inside R2D2, in this new T-shirt from TeeFury. (Look closely: seems the helpful droid has had a secret agenda, to do with Exterminating, all along.) This "Haynes manual" design T-shirt, designed by artist Reece, is only available today.

Reveal the truth about Artoo's secret Skaro connection, and prove that you own the owner's manual for the droid, by getting the T-shirt today only. [TeeFury]

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5395797&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Ten Epic Steampunk Projects We Wish We'd Thought Of First]]> We've all seen the goggles, the brass, the keyboard mods. But a few steampunk projects go above and beyond, boggling the mind and leaving us breathless. Here are ten steampunk projects that succeed in transporting us to other worlds.



Dr.Grordbort's Infallible Aether Oscillators


You may have read about Dr.Grordbort's amazing artillery here before, or perhaps you even had the pleasure of seeing them at Comic-Con. These ray-guns are the careful craftsmanship of WETA designer Greg Broadmore, who has created an entire world for his work to reside in, publishing Dr. Grordborts Contrapulatronic Dingus Directory. Broadmore is also responsible for all of the cool alien contraband tech in District 9. Take a gander at this WETA Informercial for his Infallible Aether Oscillators:




Steampunk TARDIS Console

Livejournal user Douglas442 is working on a project we wish we'd thought of first; a Steampunk TARDIS console. We assume he's building it using a only a sonic screwdriver. Douglas has posted a 3D rendering of the eventual finished project, pictured here. Wouldn't Matt Smith look dandy in his bow tie and tweed at this gleaming console? Assuming, of course, that his Doctor is a bit more competent at flying through time and space than some of his predecessors....

Steampunk Dalek
Because we can't get really mention the Doctor without making some mention of the deadly dustbins, here is an amazing little project from Who fan Alex Holden, the base of which is apparently a Dalek Bubble Bath bottle. (And yes, Cyberman Bubble Bath is also available.)

Chronotheric Fluxing Capacitron

It's what makes time travel possible. The inventor (the elusive Absinthetic) explains his revolutionary time-traveling device:

I set forth in a series of experiments, attempting to capture that energy and use it towards my research on creating tears in the fabric of time. Though I cannot divulge the exact method, I will grant you the final product: lightning in a bottle! With this incredible success, after much trial and error of course (and three dead cats), I had the 1.21 gigawatts necessary to power the Chronotheric Fluxing Capacitron and send myself back (and forward!) through the time-aether. A rotating "time dial" allows me to set the exact date and time I wish to arrive in (to the nearest hour)

A photo gallery of the CFC can be found here. His Wonderland Expedition Kit is also well worth a look, and was a runner-up for this list.


The Electriclerk
Bringing the dystopian deskware of Brazil to life, our next entry is the incredible Electriclerk . According to the Make: blog, The ElectriClerk is a functional 1988 MacSE with a 1923 Underwood typewriter base, which craftsman and creator Andrew Leman says was "built for a game of Cthulhu Lives! that has yet to be played." Leman is a multi-talent prop maker and designer, and we shudder to think what awesomeness could ensue if he and WETA's Broadmore ever collaborated.


Steampunk Telectroscope
Based on the infamous Victorian hoax, the Telectroscope is ostensibly a transatlantic tunnel, allowing viewers in London to peer through a giant 'telescope' and see viewers in New York, and vice versa. The web-cam installation appeared in both cities last year courtesy of artist Paul St. George and the Artichoke Trust, whose mechanical innovations and gigantic inventions are the next two entries on our list.


The Sultan's Elephant
The brainchild of the Artichoke Trust and theater company Royal de Luxe,The Sultan's Elephant is both dazzling performance art and a masterpiece of steampunk conceptual design. The first performance took place in Nantes, France for the Jules Verne Centennial, and involved a massive mechanical elephant, a time-traveling little girl and her rocketship. The show was performed in London in 2006 to much fanfare. If you haven't already seen it, check out this video of the Elephant in London:




Machines of the Isle of Nantes
Artichoke and Royal de Luxe set up shop in a vast shipyard and warehouse in Verne's hometown of Nantes to construct the Sultan's Elephant and other fantastical mechanical contraptions for our enjoyment. Along the way the Machines de l'île factory became a tourist attraction in itself, and in 2007 became a permanent exhibit hall and museum for the Royal de Luxe crew. The museum is home to, among other oddities, a full-scale replica of the Sultan's Elephant and a replica of the giant mechanical spider known as La Princesse. The crew is currently working on a giant merry-go-round of undersea creatures (including a giant squid!) which will debut in Spring 2010 - book tickets now!


The Swimming Cities
The Swimming Cities are something out of Terry Gilliam's daydreams, part Mad Max fantasy and partWaterworld reality. The first iteration, Swimming Cities of The Switchback Sea, is a collaborative project by notable artists and eccentrics such as Swoon, Chicken John, and Kinetic Steam Works crew. A flotilla of seven sister raft-cities, hand-crafted and cobbled together with everything including the kitchen sink, they voyaged down the Hudson River river last year and put on various multi-media performances from there decks. This year, the gang reunited and built three vessels christened The Swimming Cities of Serenissima, and sailed the rafts across the Adriatic sea to crash the Venice Biennale. We eagerly await the next installation by these merry mischief makers.



We couldn't complete this list without mentioning the Treehouse, could we? Brought to you by the fine purveyors of steam-powered wonder, Kinetic Steam Works, the Treehouse emerged as a installation for Burning Man 2007 and has since become something of a Steampunk celebrity. The 30' tall Treehouse has been traveling, and most recently showed up at Coachella. Members of KSW are currently in Nevada, assembling the Raygun Gothic Rocket in Black Rock City.

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5348553&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Countdown Science Fiction's 10 Most Murderous Robots]]> It's one thing to talk about Killer Robots, but which ones have actually managed to really rack up the senseless slaughter? Here are our choices for the ten deadliest robots for you to avoid.

Now, we know that this list is going to upset more than a few of you (Especially if you disliked the three Star Wars prequels), but we're not ranking these killer robots in order of awesome - Because then you would have seen IG-88 and KARR, amongst others - nor even in order of evil, but literally in terms of estimated kill-rate. Which robot has killed the most living things? That's all we're interested in.

So, get started with the countdown, and feel free to dispute our choices in the comments. Just don't send a robot after us, to change our minds.

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5259677&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Could'a Been Contenders...]]> Wondering where Daleks, Cybermen and the Borg are? They're over in the "Do cyborgs really count as robots?" corner, although it's arguably worth pointing out that Daleks aren't really robots at all, just aliens inside weirdly-shaped suits of armor... that may as well be robots for all we actually care. I'm sure there will be arguments about this, nonetheless. Also missing from the list: The Decepticons, who must've killed many people during their various toy, cartoon, comic and movie reigns of terror, but none that I can remember in "real" continuity (Which is to say, All Hail Megatron doesn't count, because it's intentionally an "alternate reality" story). Also also missing is Brainiac, who has just been retconned again into being as organic as robotic, sadly.

Who else have we missed? Tell all here.

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5261104&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[#1: The Manhunters]]> How deadly are they? They destroyed all life within Space Sector 666 because of a "programming glitch." How big is a Space Sector? Unknown, although the entire universe is split into at least 3601 of them, and Final Crisis claims that there are "thousands of worlds" within Earth's sector. So let's just say that's a lot of life extinguished.
Who's responsible? The Guardians of the Universe, the immortal blue dwarves who'd learn from the mistake of creating unstoppable killing machines and try and fix it by creating weapons of almost limitless potential and giving them to living beings... before embarrassing them by calling them Green Lanterns. As you can tell, that one worked out much better, at least commercially.
Last seen... hooking up with the fear-filled Sinestro Corps in 2006's The Sinestro Corps War, although you can probably expect to see them in this summer's Blackest Night crossover series from DC Comics at some point.

Next: See who didn't make the list.

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5261098&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[#2: Unicron]]> How deadly is he? He eats planets for breakfast. And lunch. And dinner. And if they're populated, all the better; it adds texture, apparently.
Who's responsible? It very much depends who you ask; Unicron has been given multiple histories throughout the years, including being a fallen god who somehow became a robot, a murderous robot exiled from his home planet or the much more common "his origins are lost to the mists of time." Given that all of the Transformers' origins are a little nebulous (Someone had to have built the first Transformer, right? But who?), it's possibly best not to dwell on this point for too long.
Last seen... Being destroyed by Galvatron (of all robots) and his body folding itself into a black hole called The Unicron Singularity in Transformers: Cybertron.

Next: Science Fiction's Most Killhappy Robots!

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5261095&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[#3: The Cylons]]> How deadly are they? They destroyed the twelve colonies of humanity, committing genocide on a scale unimaginable to everyone except Glen A. Larson and Ron Moore.
Who's responsible? It depends on which version you're asking about. The original series had the robots built by a dying alien race also called cylons, whereas the recent reboot gave them a backstory not unlike The Matrix's robot overlords (Built by humans as worker drones before rebelling and starting war).
Last seen... restarting the human race by populating Earth, millions of years ago, in this year's Battlestar Galactica season finale.

Next: Planet-Eating Robots!

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5261093&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[#4: Separatist Battle Droids]]> How deadly are they? Apparently, an unstoppable killing machine that continually causes trouble for the Republic and their Jedi forces during the many years of Star Wars' Clone Wars. Despite their apparent ineffectualness, the war continued for many years, therefore the estimated high kill-rate and higher ranking on this list. Sorry, prequel haters.
Who's responsible? The dully-named Trade Federation Army and Confederacy of Independent Systems, who seceded from the Galactic Republic and then tried to convince others to do so with the help of trigger-happy idiot drones who like to kill things. But let's face it, it's all really Senator Palpatine's doing, considering he was the one pulling all the strings behind the scenes in the first place.
Last seen... standing down after Darth Vader killed the Federation's leaders in 2005's Star Wars Episode III: Revenge Of The Sith.

Next: Genocidal Robots With A Plan!

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5261091&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[#5: Skynet/The Terminators]]> How deadly are they? They took over the Earth and are pretty much trying to destroy all human life, starting with a successful nuclear annihilation of three million people. You've seen The Terminator movies, right?
Who's responsible? The military. Sure, you could blame original creators Cyberdyne Systems, but I'm blaming the bulk of the problems on the US military, who took over the Skynet project when Cyberdyne was destroyed. They wanted to create the ultimate defense system, after all; why didn't they foresee that it would decide that they were the threats that it needed defending from?
Last seen... making life difficult for John Connor and friends in Terminator: Salvation.

Next: Ineffectual-But-Deadly Droids!

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5261090&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[#6: Sentinels (The Matrix)]]> How deadly are they? They took over the Earth and keep humans around only as batteries. Which, you know, is potentially an environmentally solution to the whole need for energy (Although they did start out with solar power.
Who's responsible? Humanity en masse. The robots that ended up taking over the world started out as domestic help and cheap labor to handle the jobs that we didn't; it was only after it was decided that robots had no legal rights that they decided to get nasty.
Last seen... coming to peaceful terms with what was left of humanity on a pretty-much destroyed Earth in The Matrix Revolutions.

Next: Time-Traveling Murder Machines!

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5261077&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[#7: Sentinels (Marvel Comics)]]> How deadly are they? They almost eradicated the mutant race, killing millions in one afternoon's work by destroying the island of Genosha. There's also a much-visited future where the Sentinels have taken over the world and killed the X-Men and many other superheroes.
Who's responsible? Humanity's intolerance and fear. Oh, and Dr. Bolivar Trask, a man who saw mutants as a threat to humanity and decided to build a collection of giant robots dedicated to genocide just in case. Subsequent models have come from the US government, the Norse God Loki and the Sentinels themselves, amongst many others who wanted to get involved in the killing game.
Last seen... as nano-Sentinels escaping after a killing spree during 2007's "Messiah Complex" storyline in the X-Men comics.

Next: Eco-Friendly Killbots!

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5261081&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[#8: Ultron]]> How deadly is he? He singlehandedly slaughtered the inhabitants of the fictional European nation of Slorernia, before enslaving the alien robot race the Phalanx and taking over countless planets as a result, for his own nefarious ends.
Who's responsible? Hank Pym (the superhero known as Ant Man, Giant Man, Goliath, Yellowjacket and, currently, the Wasp) built the original Ultron as a lab experiment in AI, but it was a little too successful; rebelling against Pym, Ultron has been responsible for all of his subsequent rebuilds and remodels.
Last seen... apparently being destroyed by Quasar and Adam Warlock at the end of 2008's Annihilation: Conquest crossover. But that never lasts.

Next: Mutant-Hunting Robots!

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5261060&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[#9: ABC Warriors]]> How deadly are they? As deadly as you want them to be; in the future's Volgan war (When the west goes to war with the fictional Russian-analog "Volgan Republic"), human soldiers are slowly replaced by robots created to fight wars. Slowly enough, in fact, that the ABC Warriors get more than a few kills in before the war ends, at which point they get to kill some more people while - at various times - rebelling against their makers, terraforming Mars, assassinating people for chaos magic rituals and getting involved in other unlikely scrapes.
Who's responsible? The military brains of the western alliance and the Volgans. Both sides came up with their own robot soldiers, giving them artificial intelligence, advanced weaponry and no immediately-obvious off switch.
Last seen... in a robotic mental asylum on Mars, reminiscing about their wartime struggles in 2000AD's current "The Volgan War" storyline.

Next: The Self-repairing Murderbot!

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5261057&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[#10: Mechagodzilla]]> How deadly is he? He rampages continually against Japan and fights Godzilla on a regular basis, with his laser eyes and flamethrower breath. I'm guessing there's got to be some level of collateral damage going on there. Also, he kills giant monsters, which can come in handy.
Who's responsible? Originally alien monkeys the Simians (who built him as a tool to help them achieve world domination), but humanity keeps finding itself rebuilding Mecha over and over again, apparently forgetful of the fact that he keeps on destroying parts of cities.
Last seen... disappearing to the bottom of the ocean to ensure Godzilla's death in 2003's Tokyo SOS.

Next: Robot Warriors!

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5261056&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[First Glimpse Of Doctor Who's Newest Bug-Eyed Monsters]]> The BBC promised that the Tritovore, the alien nasties who'll turn up in Doctor Who's Easter special, will rank up there with the Daleks and Cybermen. But don't take their word, see for yourself!

((Pictures removed. Sorry!))

Okay... not quite Dalek material, I guess. But I could see people dressing up as Tritovore for Halloween, partly because they're just Dharma Initiative members with fly heads. And with any luck, we'll be seeing all-Tritovore dance squads soon. We can hope!

In "Planet Of The Dead," the Doctor and a charming thief named Christina get on a London bus, which gets whisked off to an alien world, where presumably mayhem ensues.

[Doctor Who on LJ and DWDaily_Ru and Who Daily]

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5179984&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Doctor Who Villains Revealed, Insane Hyperbole Ensues]]> Remember the Daleks, Doctor Who's cybernetic villains? And the Cybermen, Doctor Who's other cybernetic villains? Of course you do. But soon you'll be uttering the name Tritovore in the same breath as those world-shattering villains. Doctor Who's Easter special will introduce these new monsters, which are described as half-man, half-fly. A BBC source told Digital Spy:

They are disgusting and will last long in the memory... Everyone remembers the Daleks and the Cyberman, but not a lot else if they're honest. The Tritovore will change that. Scriptwriters are confident they'll make a huge impact.

And the Tritovore may come back in future episodes as well. I have to say, if you want to create a menace we'll be naming for years to come, including the word "Trite" in their name probably isn't the best move. [Digital Spy]

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5143302&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The BBC Tried To Ruin Doctor Who – Before It Even Began]]> The BBC has released the earliest planning documents for its time travel dramedy Doctor Who – and they pitched a show very different from the one we love. This treasure trove of notes from 1963, online for the first time, presents the BBC's three unbreakable rules for good science fiction, including no robots and no bug-eyed monsters. Read on for a vision of a Doctor Who that could have been – and that could have looked a lot more like Torchwood.

In 1962, the head of BBC serial dramas requested a study on whether "SF" could be adapted for television. The answer? Not really. "People aren't all that mad about SF," the first report observes, "but it is compulsive." And most SF was American, leaving the BBC with only the "modest writer" Arthur C. Clarke and the "clumsy and old-fashioned" C.S. Lewis to adapt. (in another jab at C.S. Lewis, he is labeled "boring and platitudinous" – perhaps they're lucky he passed away the day before "An Unearthly Child" aired, and couldn't complain that the TARDIS stole his "bigger on the inside" shtick).

Television SF, they conclude, "must not be written by SF writers." Most SF of the day consisted of "the imaginative short story with philosophic overtones" – fine on paper, but no good for television. One wonders if they'd ever heard of a little thing from across the pond called The Twilight Zone.

But the Beeb prevailed! And a follow-up memo concluded three basic rules for a proper SF serial, which boil down to:

1. No Bug-Eyed Monsters
2. No Tin Robots
3. No elaborate SF settings (ie, the interior of a spaceship or the surface of a planet)

The Daleks, the Cybermen, the TARDIS console, and several Welsh quarries all hang their heads in shame.

Once they'd established the ground rules, the BBC's best and brightest were still stuck on a premise – and their solution sounds suspiciously similar to Torchwood. "Partners in a firm of scientific consultants!" announces the new series' concept notes, hoping that bold-face type will make a consulting firm sound exciting. Cecil Webber, writing the pitch, wanted our heroes to be called "The Troubleshooters." A young man, a young woman, a child, and "a maturer man with a character twist" (Ian, Barbara, Susan, and the Doctor?) would solve off-beat scientific mysteries, with some freelance adventuring on the side. So, basically, Torchwood. Except the same document also states that "SF is deliberately unsexual." Torchwood, minus the sex. Sounds awesome.

The next document, "Background Notes for Dr. Who," brings us a little closer to the show we know, as the "maturer man with a twist" becomes "a frail old man lost in time and space." This draft intended the mystery of Dr. Who (it's really hard to type "Dr. Who" and not "the Doctor," by the way!) to get re-set with each story, remaining inscrutable to the other characters. Dr. Who is a bit of a luddite, who hates scientific progress. He wants to find "an ideal past," and then "destroy or nullify the future." Head of Drama Sydney Newman penciled in a rejection of this idea – not because it sucks, but because he didn't want Dr. Who to be a reactionary.

Webber finishes up the document by offering several theories about Dr. Who's true identity:

"Was it by means of Dr. Who's machine that Aladin's palace sailed through the air? Was Merlin Dr. Who? Was Cinderella's Godmother Dr. Who's wife chasing him through time? Jacob Marley was Dr. Who slightly tipsy, but what other tricks did he get up to that Yuletide?"

Well, he was proven right on the Merlin count, but I'm not so sure about the rest…

[BBC]

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5094018&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[BSG's Cylons Were Originally Daleks With Legs]]> What better way to celebrate the 30th anniversary of Battlestar Galactica this week than by disillusioning fans? We'll do that by letting you know just how unoriginal the show's robotic bad guys really were. It's not enough that they looked like Darth Vader's cheaper, silver cousins - now we find out that they were originally intended to have been very similar to Doctor Who's favorite alien cyborgs, as well.

As part of a retrospective look at the creation of BSG's Cylons, original designer Andrew Probert revealed the hidden Dalek-eque origin that we were all spared:

Originally the Galactica motion picture (for overseas distribution) was filmed with dialog explaining that the Cylons were creatures. They were blind and created helmet scanners to see. That explains the helmets... The living Cylons were changed to robots for the TV series because of an hourly body-count limitation for prime-time television. There was, however, no limit to how many robots could be ‘killed’ per hour so they became robots and dialog was revised to explain it all.

It's not often you'll hear us saying this, but thank the Gods for network TV standards and practices. It's not that we're against the idea of Daleks with legs per se, but if the Cylons had been armor-wearing aliens in the original show, it's unlikely that we would've gotten the various twists, turns and headfraks provided by the sleeper agents in Ron Moore's reinvention of the show.

the true history of the cylons [Darth Mojo]

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5051980&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[All Hail The Returning Dalek Emperor (Parrot)]]> Good news! The Dalek-impersonating parrot we told you about? The one who had flown away from home, promising to exterminate the entire human race? He's been found again, and now there's a video of him chanting the Dalek watchword and looking, actually, quite sinister. [BBC]

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5048550&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Has Russell T Davies Destroyed The Daleks?]]> Have the Daleks been rendered dramatically impotent by overuse in Doctor Who? That's the theory behind a new essay online, whose author argues that we've seen too much wholescale destruction to allow Russell T Davies' favorite alien overlords to seem threatening ever again.

Digital Spy's Ben Rawson-Jones feels that we've not only seen too much of the Daleks, but we've also see them completely destroyed too many times:

Rose Tyler's absorption of the Tardis vortex allowed her to disintegrate every Dalek in existence (apparently), which was a sudden plot twist that tied in with the ongoing 'Bad Wolf' story arc. Fast forward a year later and the Daleks are out in force and dominating the Earth's skies. Rose Tyler pulls a lever and suddenly all the Daleks (except the Cult of Skaro) fly into the Void and out of reality. Job done.

Most recently in 'Journey's End', Donna Noble has to flick a few switches in the Crucible and, shock horror, the Daleks go doolally and blow up. All of them. In seconds. Again.

Just as importantly, he argues, even when the Daleks aren't being genocidally defeated, they still seem ineffectual:

[T]here's a danger of returning to the days when Daleks would scream "exterminate" several times until their intended victim was able to escape. This happened to both Wilf and Sarah Jane in the latest season finale, although one trigger-happy Dalek at least managed to strike The Doctor with a glancing shot. Still, even that didn't do much damage. Are they starting to fire blanks?

While the Daleks were never able to kill off any series regulars, he's kind of got a point; when was the last time that they managed to exterminate anyone of any real importance to a storyline? Maybe one of the first things Steven Moffat should do when he takes over is to create a couple of redshirts to create some sense of pathos when the evil pepperpots inevitably return. He could even call one Scott Hall.

Cult Spy: The Impotence of the Daleks [Digital Spy]

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5035244&view=rss&microfeed=true