Enter your username and password.
-
posts about #darkknightgotham more →
Get Used To Eddie Murphy In Batman 3, aka Gotham
| posts about #darkknightgotham more → |
Get Used To Eddie Murphy In Batman 3, aka Gotham |
12/24/08
All you Eddie Murphy haters will cringe after they give the Riddler role to Dane Cooke. You will wish they gave the role to Chris Tucker after that announcement. Or wishing for the "good old days" of Jim Carrey.
12/24/08
12/24/08
That's not true. There were the end credits, signifying that the experience was over.
12/24/08
[splashpage.mtv.com]
12/24/08
12/24/08
12/24/08
12/24/08
Dwayne Johnson as Bane
Seriously, though, anything that brought a quality version of harley quinn or anarky to the screen would be sweet. And I feel like those two could pick up from the ending of DK nicely. I mean, clayface would also be awesome, i think, but it's one that pushes the "yeah this guy could actually exist" limits.
12/24/08
Clayface I is a perfectly workable character. No shapeshifting, no freak accidents that give him special powers...just a guy who's really good with disguises. You know, Hollywood-style disguises, with makeup and toupes and such.
12/24/08
12/24/08
12/24/08
I swear to baby jebus, if you put up a pic of Don Johnson's Heartbeat, I'm gonna reach through the screen and throttle you.
12/24/08
[uk]
12/24/08
12/24/08
12/24/08
Batman: "Those files are all you'll need to bring him down. But I can't do it this time. It's up to you."
Gordon: "But where can I find him? The man's impossible to track down."
Batman: "Look for a condo made of stone-a."
Man, if only to hear the line in the gravely Batman voice...
12/24/08
@Byronotron: well, you know, I figure let's get some more SNL alum in the mix.
12/24/08
12/24/08
12/24/08
Now, though I'd disagree personally, I'd understand if Temple was on that list, and I certainly can't argue about the new one... but Last Crusade... really?
Are you sure you're not getting it and Temple's release order mixed up...?
12/24/08
At least _Temple of Doom_ was telling a different story ... not just the same one with different special effects. _Last Crusade_ was a cheat, a wimp-out, a pandering, festering mess of a film, barely made watchable by high production values and skilled actors unfortunately handed the veriest tripe to speak.
I mean, let's face it: Raiders moved our characters across the globe *for valid storytelling reasons*. Indy starts in the Pre Credits Sequence, moves to College, moves to Tibet, moves to Cairo, gets to Tanis, moves to The Island Fortress, film ends. Last Crusade has to *shove* Indy around to get all the set pieces in (We need him in water for The Boat Scene! Okay, we'll have the NEXT bit in Venice!") On the other hand, Last Crusade hauls our heroes hundreds of miles IN A STOLEN MOTORCYCLE AND SIDECAR for the SOLE purpose of a single, two-second CHEAP JOKE ... and then, poof, we're back where we were, storywise. I'm shocked that I didn't walk out of the theatre with whiplash.
12/24/08
Everyone, pay attention now. Here is a perfect example of someone who missed the entire point of the movie. Last Crusade was about the father/son dynamic, which was _NOT_ part of Raiders.
Also, out of that list of Raiders locations, Tanis is the only one that is pretty much mandated by the McGuffin, since that's the last place where it is known to have been. Everything else was a "because we felt like it" location. I mean, it makes sense that Indy would end up at _a_ college, but not any specific one.
12/24/08
let alone...
Sorry... had to.
12/25/08
12/24/08
12/24/08
12/24/08
12/24/08
Only if you want Gotham City to be defended by Bat-Bobblehead.