If they want to do something that's "Firefly-like, but not Firefly" I wouldn't object to a remake of Earth 2, provided Tim Curry wasn't allowed within 500 ft. of the set.
If they keep the core premise of "An overpopulated Earth launches a colonization mission to another planet, but the ship is sabotaged and only a few survive. The planet turns out to be inhabited by various indigenous lifeforms, and had previously been a dumping ground for hardened criminals and other undesirables." and then scrap 90% of everything else, then you've got a pretty open-ended show that can be shot entirely in Vancouver, with lots of opportunity for drawn out Lost-eque "OMG, What's in the hatch!!!" style drama.
@Erich Krueger: I'd watch it, even with a crappy American cast, on the sole condition that they dust off Paul Darrow, and have him come back as a (more) bitter half-crazy Avon, who's been locked away 'Man In the Iron Mask' style in a top secret Federation prison for the last 30 years.
I'd be tempted to ask for Jacqueline Pierce back too, but apparently she's moved to South Africa to raise monkeys. And no, I'm not making that up.
He glossed right over what's wrong with the entertainment industry in general. You can't put hard SF on SyFy? Why the hell not? Where do you put it? Lifetime? FOX? I thought the whole idea behind 900 cable channels was that you could have niche programming and sustain it without blockbuster ratings.
What's confused and disguted at the same time? Confusted?
@KinoEscalate: Wasn't there a rumour at some point that this is going to HBO? Pay cable is really the only venue I can see that would realistically pick up 100 episodes of an unproven TV show.
@DeltaGuy: Granted, Star Wars, the TV show, is unproven, but do you honestly think that all the SW geeks/nerds (myself included) would really NOT watch it. It would be very lucritive (sp) for ANY network to pick it up.
@jmortj5: It may be lucrative, depending on how intense the bidding war is for the series, and if the networks are able to avoid overpaying for its rights. Considering the current financial situation of broadcast television, I really doubt that any of the networks (NBC, CBC, ABC, FOX, or The CW) are really going to be able to guarantee all 100 episodes will be aired, or be willing to pay such a premium for an unproven product. I personally believe that TimeWarner will purchase the rights, and air the series in first-run on HBO, and then in a second, basic cable on TNT.
@wandering_nomad: They don't need to take it, NBC-Uni already owns it. They just need to release the pilot on DVD, reair it again on SyFy as a "premiere", and instant Space Opera!
If they do not go with Virtuality, however, I do believe that they should focus on launching a new series. As enjoyable as Firefly and Farscape both were, each series carries too much baggage to be relaunched. With a good creative team, SyFy can create something just as good. Fans and viewers simply need to give them this opportunity, and move on past these cancelled gems.
Someone ought to approach Peter David about creating a Space Opera. I like what he did on Babylon 5 and his Trek stuff is consistent. Plus he's incredibly prolific so there would be no shortage on scripts and ideas. Listen to my giant brain, SyFy. It knows all.
The thing that I think disturbs us most was, people, as we expected, saying 'Well this is just another opportunity to put more ECW on the air.' Or, 'This is another opportunity to do even more reality.' That isn't true and recent announcements [prove otherwise]. We've picked up Caprica, it'll launch in the new year. We've picked up Stargate Universe, the next exciting chapter of the longest running space opera in TV history. This isn't about retrenching, this is about absolutely embracing the totality of not just our core audience but actually, a new audience in the future."
Quite frankly, your comments have the same ring as speeches we've all heard as employees when a company embarks on an unpopular and universally disapproved change. A corporate manager comes and makes a speech. The executive says "We're not really doing what it seems like we're obviously doing." We all know that it's a bunch of baloney and we also he's just doing his job.
Putting on more ECW or reality programming? That's exactly what you're going to do. You're disturbed? Of course, you're disturbed - it's your job to peddle this stuff and people have called you out on it before you even introduced the logo. Nobody likes to be called out.
Let's face it. If you had any other plan, you wouldn't saying "...this is about absolutely embracing the totality of not just our core audience but actually, a new audience in the future."
What did you just say? Absolutely nothing.
But you can't come out and say "We are making this channel less about science fiction."
The fact that this conference call even took place to explain this change means it has already failed by any measuring stick and it is all damage control now.
Everyone needs to relax and stop bashing the name for the sake of bashing the name and leaving a 'funny' comment.
We haven't even seen anything about how the channel will look, sound or feel. I think everyone should wait to pass judgement on Syfy until we actually see it in action.
@hanspecans: Yeah, but that was all about merging Ha! and The Comedy Channel, and they didn't come up with a goofy spelling of their old name. This is the latter, done for some nebulous point.
But hey, maybe some good will come out of this, and people will start referring to cheap crap as "syfy", while reserving "scifi" for the good stuff. That way, when you go into the DVD store, you can eliminate fully half of what's there based on which section it got filed in.
07/08/09
FYREFLY
07/08/09
07/07/09
I am not thinking it will be more Farscape on the channel but come on. Webisodes? Something? Set int he same universe? Anything? Bueller?
07/07/09
If they keep the core premise of "An overpopulated Earth launches a colonization mission to another planet, but the ship is sabotaged and only a few survive. The planet turns out to be inhabited by various indigenous lifeforms, and had previously been a dumping ground for hardened criminals and other undesirables." and then scrap 90% of everything else, then you've got a pretty open-ended show that can be shot entirely in Vancouver, with lots of opportunity for drawn out Lost-eque "OMG, What's in the hatch!!!" style drama.
07/07/09
Barring that; Blake's 7!
07/07/09
I'd be tempted to ask for Jacqueline Pierce back too, but apparently she's moved to South Africa to raise monkeys. And no, I'm not making that up.
07/07/09
07/07/09
What's confused and disguted at the same time? Confusted?
07/07/09
That was some of the finest non-think doublespeak ever from him.
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
If they do not go with Virtuality, however, I do believe that they should focus on launching a new series. As enjoyable as Firefly and Farscape both were, each series carries too much baggage to be relaunched. With a good creative team, SyFy can create something just as good. Fans and viewers simply need to give them this opportunity, and move on past these cancelled gems.
07/07/09
Kings...IN SPACE!
Ian McShane delivers monologues...IN SPACE!
Give me a job already, Skiffie
07/07/09
I'd watch it.
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
Seinfeld In Space -- "what is the DEAL with the food in the plastic bags?"
03/24/09
Quite frankly, your comments have the same ring as speeches we've all heard as employees when a company embarks on an unpopular and universally disapproved change. A corporate manager comes and makes a speech. The executive says "We're not really doing what it seems like we're obviously doing." We all know that it's a bunch of baloney and we also he's just doing his job.
Putting on more ECW or reality programming? That's exactly what you're going to do. You're disturbed? Of course, you're disturbed - it's your job to peddle this stuff and people have called you out on it before you even introduced the logo. Nobody likes to be called out.
Let's face it. If you had any other plan, you wouldn't saying "...this is about absolutely embracing the totality of not just our core audience but actually, a new audience in the future."
What did you just say? Absolutely nothing.
But you can't come out and say "We are making this channel less about science fiction."
03/24/09
03/24/09
We haven't even seen anything about how the channel will look, sound or feel. I think everyone should wait to pass judgement on Syfy until we actually see it in action.
You guys aren't going to watch Caprica and SGU?
03/24/09
03/24/09
Welcome to io9.
03/24/09
03/24/09
Remember when comedy central used to be called "Ha!".
Ok i just dated my self with that post.
03/24/09
Yep. That's when I first started watching MST3K.
03/24/09
Yeah, but that was all about merging Ha! and The Comedy Channel, and they didn't come up with a goofy spelling of their old name. This is the latter, done for some nebulous point.
But hey, maybe some good will come out of this, and people will start referring to cheap crap as "syfy", while reserving "scifi" for the good stuff. That way, when you go into the DVD store, you can eliminate fully half of what's there based on which section it got filed in.