Enter your username and password.
San Francisco, 2:45 AM
Wed Nov 11
27 posts in the last 24 hours

Tip your editors: tips@io9.com
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz | Email
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders | Email
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner | Email
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis | Email
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan | Email
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier | Email
Ed Grabianowski | Email
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan | Email
Lauren Davis | Email
Chris Hsiang | Email
Lynn Peril | Email
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins | Email
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox | Email
Interns:
Tim Barribeau | Email
Julia Carusillo | Email
Alex Eichler | Email
Cyriaque Lamar | Email
Caitlin Petrakovitz | Email
Mary Ratliff | Email
Josh Snyder | Email
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
11/10/09
11/10/09
Muhahahahahaha! No one will ever know... oh, wait #theberg
11/10/09
11/10/09
I think this sweet bastard is currently in development: #design
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
Do you think they know we don't actually have a ship? #v
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
1: The apparent 'cockpit canopy bump' is too far forward.
So they look 'cab forward' like a Lamborghini vs a Ferrari.
So your 'eye' tells you the centre of gravity is in the wrong place and it shouldn't fly.
2: They adopt a different flight 'attitude' because there is no pilot's eyeline to be flown 'around'.
So they look like they're 'pointing' in the wrong direction to be flying where they're going.
3: In flight there is a lack of dynamic pilot control inputs.
So they don't look like they're being 'flown'.
4: There is no pilot's helmet visible.
So there is no perceived 'eye contact' with the pilot.
5: It's a machine. #design
11/10/09
#design
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
Predator in da house, yo, indeed. #design
11/10/09
1) Berlin was built on a marsh. Nice soft ground; it's been filled in for 750 years now, but a swamp is still a swamp. If these people were to dump 1000 meters of fill into a flat area, there will be a greater subsidence, and foundations around the area will crack as the ground sinks. The areas that were covered by glaciers during the last ice age are still rebounding- this is the obverse of that.
2) If you build a 1000 meter mountain, will you get avalanches? Once again, if you live down the road from the newly minted Tempelhofberg, keep aware of where you children are, during the winter.
3) Does it rain much? Landslides could be a joy as well. Landslides are more deadly then the avalanches. The rubble and debris from each landslide could be added to the new mountain. Hugh Grant might be able to explain what it's like to walk up a hill but come down a mountain.
Doesn't this seem like something they'd be doing in Dubai? #theberg