San Francisco, 10:58 AM
Fri Dec 11
26 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |
Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |
OK, so now I'm missing the remake of Day of the Triffids as well as the End of Time Part 1? Denmark really doesn't deserve the attention it's getting from me this Jul.
Is it wrong that this Christmas/New Years I'm seriously considering trying to catch swine flu, just so I can stay home and geek out with all the great Sci-fi on TV?
I'd rather Chuck were just a straightforward badass. There's nothing more annoying than a superpower that fails whenever the writers can't find another way out.
The Potter epilogue was infamous? Really? I admit I don't recall any controversy about it - in fact I seem to recall Harry and Hermione futzing about in the woods for most of the school year being more infamous. I'd be interested to read some of the reaction - I rather liked the epilogue.
@Lassus: Reportedly, Rowling was set to kill off Harry at the end of the book from the beginning, but changed her mind at the last minute and made the epilogue that's there now. I guess a lot of HP faithful felt it was a rather disappointing way to end it all.
@TemporalSword: She did get a little blood-happy, but the faithful were disappointed that he didn't die? First I'd heard that.
I admit I hadn't heard he was supposed to buy it. In fact, if he was and she changed her mind, I can see how that probably made her so death-happy with everyone else.
@Lassus: I'm not sure if the disappointment was solely that he didn't die, or just that the whole "flash forward to their 30's and living a normal life" aspect just felt cliched and out of place.
@Lassus: My problem with it was similar to my problem with the final Buffy episode: it was way too happy and did not reflect the tone change of the book. If all the Harry Potter books had been like the 1st book, then the super-happy "We have fabulous lives!" epilogue would have made sense, but it had become a much darker, more grown-up series and the epilogue just sort of pushed that aside.
@TemporalSword: That implies they didn't really read the series. The whole thing was cliched. I read it all, it was mildly enjoyable, but nothing to be excited over.
@ctuley: Eh. I disagree about that. Their friends and family are still dead, they still lived through a horrible, scarring time. I think getting down on the level of happiness and closure that they have as adults in a 15-minute window is based on subjectivity and not really an empirical narrative problem. (Which, ironically, I DO feel was present in the portion of the book I refer to above, the endless hanging out in the forest.)
@Lassus: There were a lot of people pretty angry over it. Reasons bounced around from too cliched, too happy, didn't fit the tone, didn't match the rest of the book, felt tacked on, was written as well, showed that Ginny went from being a bad-ass who fought death eaters to a housewife, focused on how many kids they'd all had, ignored important characters, didn't deal with the repercussions of any of the deaths very well, and my person gripe with it, somehow in only a few pages managed to be confusing and contradict itself (at least, that's what I remember).
But it should be said that because I didn't like it, I read a lot of the things where people were talking about not liking it. If you liked it, you probably didn't notice them, it wasn't a huge firestorm.
@Mary Ratliff: "...showed that Ginny went from being a bad-ass who fought death eaters to a housewife..."
Er, wasn't Ginny's mom a housewife who was bad-ass and fought death-eaters? I would say that extrapolating definite specific aspects of a life not shown from a short epilogue is a mistake. I read it as a snapshot specifically showing a happy time in their adult lives because we just finished a seven-book battle where a lot of people died and were incredibly unhappy.
However, I think a lot of what you say is definitely valid. I was never that invested in the series on a deeper emotional level. I can see how for those who WERE invested, it was troubling and had problems. That is probably a big part of how my opinion doesn't match up. I am not part of the decidedly adult "YA IS AWESOME" meme. I personally think the happiness was done for the original audience, the kids - I'd wonder how all the 11-to-13-year-olds felt.
@Lassus: Yeah, that's definitely true about Molly Weasley. I never really got into that whole debate, it was just one of the things I read people arguing about, mostly people who already didn't like Ginny for one reason or another (she was never my personal favorite actually) but they never could back up why it was such a bad thing since we didn't know for sure that she wasn't still the same way as she was before.
@Lassus: I don't buy the 'they're living normal lives' deal. Harry and Ron are the Wizarding equivalent of secret agents, Hermione is like the Wizarding attorney general, Neville is a Professor, and Ginny (wee found out in interviews) is a Professional Quidditch player.
However, I still think it was unnecessary. I could have imagined most of that (Although I would have had Neville as the DADA professor); and we never found out what happened with a lot of the civil-rights issues.
i cant wait for day of the triffids either; eddie izzard in a PA scenario?! until then io9'ers get your DOTF fix via Netflix, the BBC miniseries was awesome. more about how society goes on after the apocalypse and not blowing the "heads" off plants. [en.wikipedia.org])
Yay for "Chuck"! Anyone else experiencing "Supernatural" withdrawals yet? Where do they get off taking a vacation, don't they know the Apocalypse is happening?
12/10/09
If I was her, it'd be "if you love someone, set their teeth free."
12/10/09
12/10/09
12/10/09
12/10/09
12/10/09
12/10/09
12/10/09
That's funny... No? Little bit?
12/10/09
12/10/09
12/10/09
I admit I hadn't heard he was supposed to buy it. In fact, if he was and she changed her mind, I can see how that probably made her so death-happy with everyone else.
12/10/09
12/10/09
12/10/09
//'s'no Dresden Files.
12/10/09
12/10/09
But it should be said that because I didn't like it, I read a lot of the things where people were talking about not liking it. If you liked it, you probably didn't notice them, it wasn't a huge firestorm.
12/10/09
Er, wasn't Ginny's mom a housewife who was bad-ass and fought death-eaters? I would say that extrapolating definite specific aspects of a life not shown from a short epilogue is a mistake. I read it as a snapshot specifically showing a happy time in their adult lives because we just finished a seven-book battle where a lot of people died and were incredibly unhappy.
However, I think a lot of what you say is definitely valid. I was never that invested in the series on a deeper emotional level. I can see how for those who WERE invested, it was troubling and had problems. That is probably a big part of how my opinion doesn't match up. I am not part of the decidedly adult "YA IS AWESOME" meme. I personally think the happiness was done for the original audience, the kids - I'd wonder how all the 11-to-13-year-olds felt.
12/10/09
12/10/09
However, I still think it was unnecessary. I could have imagined most of that (Although I would have had Neville as the DADA professor); and we never found out what happened with a lot of the civil-rights issues.
12/10/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
She's still time traveling. And it could technically be the same Charlotte but from before she died. That pretty much allows her to pop up anywhere.
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/07/09