<![CDATA[io9: emilio estevez]]> http://tags.lifehacker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/io9.com.png <![CDATA[io9: emilio estevez]]> http://io9.com/tag/emilioestevez http://io9.com/tag/emilioestevez <![CDATA[How To Train Your Robot To Recognize You]]> When you come home from work at night, does your robot greet you at the door expectantly, or does it sit there impassively in its recharging node because it can't tell the difference between you, the mailman, and Emilio Estevez? Today's computer scientists are hard at work making sure tomorrow's robots won't leave you feeling emotionally shunned. Check out how researchers at the Carnegie Mellon University Robotics Institute are using something called "Active Appearance Modeling" to improve face recognition algorithms that will make your bot snap to attention when it sees your face.


Recognizing a face is harder than it sounds. Using Active Appearance Modeling (one of the common methods in use today), a computer has to compare a face it sees to an "average face" it has previously learned. It works pretty well when the subject smiles and stares right into the computer's camera, but in real life, lighting, facial expression and "3D pose variation" present serious obstacles.

The Robotics Institute team is working on that last bit. Whenever you turn your head, part of your face is occluded. Without the right features to make its comparison, the computer can't recognize you. New algorithms and programming methods allow for the creation of 3D face meshes that can be adjusted on the fly to fit the subject's face, even if she turns partly away from the camera.

Of course, the government will use this technology to track our every move long before we have friendly helper robots who know us on sight, but it's nice to know we live in a world where something called the Robotics Institute actually exists. Image by: Robotics Institute.

AAM Fitting Algorithms. [Carnegie Mellon University Robotics Institute]

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=390636&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Clubs of the Future with Mick Jagger, Jerry Hall, and Crazy Outfits!]]> I dare you to name a movie sillier than Freejack, a gooftastic flick from 1992 with Mick Jagger as a futuristic bounty hunter (in the year 2009!) who grabs people from the past and sells their bodies to dead rich people whose minds are stored in a giant mainframe. Too bad he messes with race car driver Alex, played with maximum slack by Emilio Estevez, demonstrating how far the poor guy had fallen since Repo Man.

You may remember the mind-bendingly retarded car chase from this flick, but you haven't lived until you've seen the great "club scene" — featuring Mick's then-girlfriend Jerry Hall. Alex's lady pal has taken him to this club to hook him up with a dude who can make him "disappear." So there's Jerry to look at, but also the fashion. Ska glam? Hippie ska glam? Oh my. Luckily Alex gets dosed with something and winds up doing a drunken interview with Jerry while Mick watches and plays a lame "futuristic videogame." And to think all of this will be happening next year in 2009! Whoa.

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=387416&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Repo Man Delivers One of the Best Scientology Parodies Ever]]> Back in the 1980s, then-unknown Emilio Estevez made his debut in a raunchy, SoCal punk rock cult flick called Repo Man. Starring Harry Dean Stanton as Estevez's coked-up mentor, the movie is about what happens when the repo dudes come across a car whose trunk is full of deadly alien loot. And the alien conspiracy subplot is ripped right from Scientology at a time when the Scientologists were still a power to be reckoned with. This scene captures the loony appeal of the flick, as one of Estevez's weird pals tells him all about "Dioretix" and time travel. Sounds like the plot of The 4400, or maybe just something L. Ron Hubbard would have written. It's time for this movie to get a nice revival. [Repo Man]

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=377092&view=rss&microfeed=true