@goldfarb: I realize that, it is my home. But turning off the water won't transform it into Tatooine; there's just not that much sand around here.
Seriously, it's more a flat, scrub-brush kind of desert. Let it go back to nature, and it'll be dusty and kind of brushy.
Heck, the name is Spanish for "The Meadows" - before settlement, and urbanization, this place was an oasis. I know it won't go back to that, it it won't be the surface of Arrakis either.
As I said, it's a matter of sand, and the lack thereof. Not all deserts are sand dunes.
@Lassus: Yeah it's not my clearest comment. While I have nothing against them, docudramas are sort of the lowest brow form of information dispersement. Those who don't want to read about it can see a documentary, for those who a documentary is too dry and need a little more zazz can go for a docudrama, after that we get into the realm of things like "The Patriot". I just think it's ironic that they use that medium to call people stupid.
@Garrison Dean: R.O.A.C.H.: nothing plays to the lowest common denomenator better than telling them there's an even lower denomenator to make them feel superior.
A similar, growing business is recovering harvested lumber that "went down with the ship" in the Great Lakes. Much of it is a hundred or more years old, and is actually harder and more useful due to it's years in the cold, nearly oxygen free water.
But what happens if we decide to remove the dam or empty the reservoir? Do we plant the trees again? Do we change the acid balance in the newly exposed soil?
@tetracycloide: I'm well aware of that. I was really commenting that this is isn't as environmentally friendly as all that. All it really does is defers the tree loss until decades later when or if the reservoir is removed.
Sure, the trees are useless to us when buried underwater and perhaps even mildly toxic to fish that move into the dammed lake but, those dead logs still store carbon that won't be released by us. Probably better to just leave them there to rot naturally.
@corpore-metal: so your argument is that when the reservoir is removed new growth will loose the benefit of the already dead trees rotting after the preserving water has been removed? somehow i doubt the significance of this difference given that, if the reservoir is removed, there will likely be a lot of rotting aquatic life in the area already.
I would've thought the environmentalists would scream about the destruction of fish habitats. But I'm not a regular at the Greenpeace meetings, so I don't know.
@BongoFury: Since I don't think you have a serious answer yet, the answer here is that while there will be some tradeoff for fish habitats, the reclaimed lumber worth harvesting will be large enough and in small enough quantities that we won't exactly be destroying habitats for it.
Additionally, there's a tradeoff to be had here - the amount of lumber that can be reclaimed here is pretty significant, and wouldn't require the decimation of land-bound habitats that unsustainable logging requires currently. It's really a much more environmentally friendly solution, and in many cases provides preserved, high quality wood in large volumes.
i believe a similar technique is used to recover submerged timber from older logging operations that sank instead of floating down river. often the timber recovered belongs to now rare or even extinct species and fetches quite a price.
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
Seriously, it's more a flat, scrub-brush kind of desert. Let it go back to nature, and it'll be dusty and kind of brushy.
Heck, the name is Spanish for "The Meadows" - before settlement, and urbanization, this place was an oasis. I know it won't go back to that, it it won't be the surface of Arrakis either.
As I said, it's a matter of sand, and the lack thereof. Not all deserts are sand dunes.
07/06/09
BOOO! :(
07/06/09
There really aren't a lot of sand dunes in the US deserts -- they're so unusual that those that do exist are national parks and tourist attractions.
I don't know where all that sand would come from. More of the Stupid, I guess?
07/06/09
I hope so...it's terrible.
07/06/09
07/06/09
What do you mean, exactly?
07/06/09
07/07/09
01/07/09
Sawfish!
01/06/09
01/06/09
*not counting anime/manga, b/c for all I know, that's a whole damn genre there
01/06/09
01/06/09
01/06/09
Sure, the trees are useless to us when buried underwater and perhaps even mildly toxic to fish that move into the dammed lake but, those dead logs still store carbon that won't be released by us. Probably better to just leave them there to rot naturally.
01/06/09
01/06/09
01/06/09
I'm A Robot Lumberjack and I'm OK?
01/06/09
01/06/09
01/06/09
01/06/09
01/06/09
01/06/09
Additionally, there's a tradeoff to be had here - the amount of lumber that can be reclaimed here is pretty significant, and wouldn't require the decimation of land-bound habitats that unsustainable logging requires currently. It's really a much more environmentally friendly solution, and in many cases provides preserved, high quality wood in large volumes.
01/06/09
I would be highly amused if the robots ran by burning wood.
01/06/09