• io9
  • science
  • overmind
  • kotaku
  • gizmodo
  • Profile logout login

#evolution#br

io9

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #observationdeck,
  • #tips,
  • #calendar,
  • etc.

San Francisco, 5:08 AM
Sat Dec 19
30 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip your editors:

Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |

News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |

Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |

Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |

Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |

Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |

Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |

Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |

More:
io9 on Facebook
follow io9 on Twitter

SUBSCRIBE TO io9 RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
1428 Subscribers
io9
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of phoenix phoenix
    12/18/09

    In reply to Ten Science Stories That Changed Our Decade
    This is an excellent wrap-up of really interesting and important science-related topics in the past 10 years. They're all sufficiently big, and they're all sufficiently important to be included. Nice choices!
     Reply
    phoenix was starred phoenix was unstarred
    Image of AmishJohn AmishJohn
    12/18/09

    In reply to Ten Science Stories That Changed Our Decade
    I'm waiting for the science breakthrough that automatically shoots these comment spammers in the neck.
     Reply
    AmishJohn was starred AmishJohn was unstarred
    Image of InsidiousTuna InsidiousTuna
    12/18/09

    @AmishJohn: Hear, hear.
     Reply
    InsidiousTuna was starred InsidiousTuna was unstarred
    Image of The5thElephant The5thElephant
    12/18/09

    @AmishJohn: I saw one that was approved the other day! I recoiled in horror.
     Reply
    The5thElephant was starred The5thElephant was unstarred
    Image of njdevil njdevil
    12/18/09

    In reply to Ten Science Stories That Changed Our Decade
    Those are some tasty looking chromosomes...
     Reply
    Ghost_in_the_Machine promoted this comment Edited by njdevil at 12/18/09 5:44 PM njdevil was starred njdevil was unstarred
    Image of njdevil njdevil
    12/18/09

    @njdevil:
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead promoted this comment njdevil was starred njdevil was unstarred
    Image of Ghost_in_the_Machine Ghost_in_the_Machine
    12/18/09

    @njdevil: Mmmm. Gummy genes.
     Reply
    Ghost_in_the_Machine was starred Ghost_in_the_Machine was unstarred
    Image of pixysix pixysix
    12/08/09

    In reply to Charting the Possible Evolution of Same-Sex Liaisons
    For the record, I love the gay community. I lived on Davie street in Vancouver for three years and it's a very endearing community. I just want to clarify because it's a hot button issue if people misinterpret my meaning (which is always possible in a text-based chat)

    Anyways, for the last few years I've kind of figured that homosexuality IS nature's birth control. Everything is supposed to be in balance for the Earth's ecosystem to survive. We have cures for many kinds of infertility and very few women in the developed world die in childbirth anymore. We've cheekily removed the real danger from nearly every disease and natural disaster that the Earth currently has. We can't reabsorb fetuses in the womb when the den is overcrowded (as rabbits do) and we're well past three times the number of humans that the Earth could safely sustain so I think that homosexuality may be a natural form of population control. I know that it has always been around, but I still think that I'm on to something.

    It's hard to convince humans to stop having sex so if they want to have sex in ways that can't possibly cause procreation we can at least put a small dent in the population explosion (population nuclear winter?) Never mind fruitful, go forth and be FABULOUS!
     Reply
    Klebert L. Hall promoted this comment pixysix was starred pixysix was unstarred
    Image of Klebert L. Hall Klebert L. Hall
    12/09/09

    @pixysix:
    You're seeing patterns where they generally don't exist - most of the more complex "natural feedback" ideas are pretty much indistinguishable from conspiracy theories, intellectual-rigor-wise.

    The problem is, that when other animal species overpopulate their environment, you don't suddenly see vast increases in homosexual behavior. Another problem with this idea is that the mechanism for what you propose is difficult to imagine, and even harder to demonstrate.

    Generally, the "control mechanism" for overpopulation is mass starvation.
    -Kle.
     Reply
    Klebert L. Hall was starred Klebert L. Hall was unstarred
    Image of pixysix pixysix
    12/09/09

    @Klebert L. Hall: but we've generally eliminated that possibility, too. It's a horrible solution where we in developed worlds develop 'psychosis' like binge eating and then cure all of the side effects of obesity while we hold food out of the hands of starving third world countries.

    Mass starvation can take out other overpopulated animal species before any larger measure is needed because they don't farm and don't have trade agreements.

    I'm not saying that homosexuality is nature's main method of human population control, I'm just saying that nature tries many things at once to keep the planet in check. Homosexuality is not something to be 'cured' so we don't fight it the way that we do genetic heart conditions. Ergo, it has a chance to fill the space in the pop. control department that some minor heart defect used to have.
     Reply
    pixysix was starred pixysix was unstarred
    Image of Klebert L. Hall Klebert L. Hall
    12/11/09

    @pixysix:
    "but we've generally eliminated that possibility, too. "

    Nah, we just aren't actually overpopulated by regular standards yet, outside of some relatively small regions.

    Don't get me wrong, I'd like to see less people. However, nature encourages increases in population up to the carrying capacity limit. There's no evidence of a strong species-diversity-encouraging mechanism.
    -Kle.
     Reply
    Klebert L. Hall was starred Klebert L. Hall was unstarred
    Image of Anekanta - Go Play! Anekanta - Go Play!
    12/08/09

    In reply to The Evolutionary Cost of Being Extremely Sexy
    I'm still skeptical about how well fruitfly mating habits scale to human mating habits; especially in how "fitness" is defined.

    Are we talking physical, mental, social, or emotional fitness? Surely there is more to fitness than simply fecundity.

    Also, is it possible that there's a downside to having too healthy or too fit a population? (over-population / over-consumption of resources; over-specialization, etc.)?

    I'm not well versed in biology, but it just seems like any concept of fitness is highly dependent on the environmental context an organism finds itself in.
     Reply
    Anekanta - Go Play! was starred Anekanta - Go Play! was unstarred
    Image of Annalee Newitz Annalee Newitz
    12/08/09

    @Anekanta - killed by a cacodemon: I don't believe the scientists suggested there was much of a connection between fruitfly and human mating habits. Humans are affected by a lot of factors other than pure evolutionary urges. In other words, there is no Lady Gaga of fruitflies.
     Reply
    Annalee Newitz was starred Annalee Newitz was unstarred
    Image of Dresan Dresan
    12/08/09

    @Annalee Newitz: We think we are but really, in the whole scheme of nature, we're just another animal.

    ...

    An animal capable of LOVE.

    #biology
     Reply
    Dresan was starred Dresan was unstarred
    Image of Anekanta - Go Play! Anekanta - Go Play!
    12/08/09

    @Annalee Newitz: I guess that's just as well--one Lady Gaga on planet Earth seems like more than enough already.
     Reply
    Anekanta - Go Play! was starred Anekanta - Go Play! was unstarred
    Image of Delphinus100 Delphinus100
    12/09/09

    @Dresan: Which doesn't change the issue. We don't always mate/marry for love, and we're capable of falling in love with a variety of body-types...
     Reply
    Dresan promoted this comment Delphinus100 was starred Delphinus100 was unstarred
    Image of GarnetLynne GarnetLynne
    12/09/09

    @Anekanta - Go Play!: unfortuantely we aren't fruitflies and we've over populated the world even with the weak and infirmed. And humans are killing each other off like rats in a maze. If we were fruitflies we would have a short cycle and less population.
     Reply
    Anekanta - Go Play! promoted this comment GarnetLynne was starred GarnetLynne was unstarred
    Image of Anekanta - Go Play! Anekanta - Go Play!
    12/09/09

    @GarnetLynne: I agree that there are too many people on the planet, but I don't think we can really evaluate them on the basis of "weakness" or infirmity. Do you mean physically weak? Mentally, socially, emotionally, or morally weak?

    Like in the original post, what qualifies as "fitness"?
     Reply
    Anekanta - Go Play! was starred Anekanta - Go Play! was unstarred
    Image of GarnetLynne GarnetLynne
    12/10/09

    @Anekanta - Go Play!: well there are standards set by the medical community. So I presume they mean people who are in good health albeit, mental and physical.
    The big boys set the standards, and they can't live up to them either.
    Just look at the person who commited suicide in the military. He was a healthy person, so they thought. Once again it's subjective and the powers that be who decide, I guess that is what plastic surgery is all about, looking your best and appearing to be healthy, whatever that is.
     Reply
    GarnetLynne was starred GarnetLynne was unstarred
    Image of Faustic_Caust Faustic_Caust
    12/08/09

    In reply to The Evolutionary Cost of Being Extremely Sexy
    @tetracycloide: "we select for extraordinary not fitness"& @Roklimber: "As I understand, one of the most important requirements for a gene pool to produce individuals that adapt easily to changes in their environment is genetic diversity.
    And that's exactly what the fruitfly male behavior achieves. By harassing the bigger and more fecund females, giving a chance to the lesser fit fenales..."

    Combining together the two sentiments here, it seems that human mating preferences are spot on; if genetic diversity is correlated with fitness with respect to disease resistance and such, then favoring phenotypic (and ostensibly genetic) outliers keeps a suite of non-common, potentially beneficial traits in play.

    Furthermore, our technologies of social organization seem fundamentally different from those of the fruitfly: the beautiful/talented/remarkable are voted more resources by the economy, and our customs and laws prevent them from wasting their time being raped all day.
     Reply
    SJ_Edwards promoted this comment Faustic_Caust was starred Faustic_Caust was unstarred
    Image of Plague Plague
    12/08/09

    In reply to The Evolutionary Cost of Being Extremely Sexy
    Well, at least the skeleton isn't photoshopped.
     Reply
    Plague was starred Plague was unstarred
    Image of tetracycloide tetracycloide
    12/08/09

    @Plague: are you kidding? there's no way those lumbar vertebrae are real!
     Reply
    tetracycloide was starred tetracycloide was unstarred
    Image of Agent355 Agent355
    12/08/09

    In reply to The Evolutionary Cost of Being Extremely Sexy
    "fruitfly sperm is toxic." Immediately made me think of a fruitfly Brintey Spears...

    "With a taste of your proboscis
    I'm on a ride
    You're toxic
    I'm slipping under
    With a taste of Drosophila paradise
    I'm addicted to you
    Don't you know that you're toxic"
     Reply
    MISS MERCY STREET promoted this comment Agent355 was starred Agent355 was unstarred
    Image of golddiggersof2033 golddiggersof2033
    12/08/09

    @Agent355: Well done.
     Reply
    golddiggersof2033 was starred golddiggersof2033 was unstarred
    Image of Dash_Stryker Dash_Stryker
    12/08/09

    @Agent355: "I hit it like this, I hit like that, I hit it with a Woffle ball bat." -The Beastie Boys.
     Reply
    Dash_Stryker was starred Dash_Stryker was unstarred
    Image of ReiRei0 ReiRei0
    12/08/09

    In reply to The Evolutionary Cost of Being Extremely Sexy
    So... this has to do with science fiction... how, exactly?
     Reply
    golddiggersof2033 promoted this comment ReiRei0 was starred ReiRei0 was unstarred
    Image of ExtensionOfBob ExtensionOfBob
    12/08/09

    @ReiRei0: I think there has been a precedent set from day one in which science non-fiction is also fair game, and while this doesn't on first glance seem to be in same category as pictures of space because of its sexiness, its sexiness does not immediately render it irrelevant...as you can't have science fiction without science and you can't have sexy science fiction without sexy science.
     Reply
    Annalee Newitz promoted this comment ExtensionOfBob was starred ExtensionOfBob was unstarred
    Image of etwarrior etwarrior
    12/08/09

    @ReiRei0: try clicking on that big "SCIENCE" link at the top of the page and count the number of articles that aren't "science fiction".

    It's interesting science information which io9 provides a delightful supply of. This supply of information also generally makes my days better, so fie on you for complaining about it.
     Reply
    Annalee Newitz promoted this comment etwarrior was starred etwarrior was unstarred
    Image of golddiggersof2033 golddiggersof2033
    12/08/09

    @ReiRei0: Because science fiction is... ummmmm... based on scientific ideas? 20 years from now, there may be an entire novel saga based on the mating of fruit flies in space.

    If you think it's dull, don't click on it. I don't give two shakes about Avatar (sh!!!) so I just don't visit those posts.
     Reply
    golddiggersof2033 was starred golddiggersof2033 was unstarred
    Image of tipsymongoose tipsymongoose
    12/08/09

    In reply to The Evolutionary Cost of Being Extremely Sexy
    "the mating process is itself damaging to the health of the females - fruitfly sperm is toxic."

    I so could have gone through my whole life without ever needing to know that bit of information.
     Reply
    Annalee Newitz promoted this comment tipsymongoose was starred tipsymongoose was unstarred
    Image of blackoak blackoak
    12/08/09

    In reply to The Evolutionary Cost of Being Extremely Sexy
    Doesn't this argument (maintaining mediocrity) work only by presuming that we all have the same tastes/look for the exact same attributes in a mate?

    I'm sure the study addresses this point (or I've just asked a stupid question - not for the first time) but I've missed it.
     Reply
    Annalee Newitz promoted this comment blackoak was starred blackoak was unstarred
    Image of Annalee Newitz Annalee Newitz
    12/08/09

    @blackoak: I think you are confusing fruitfly psychology with human psychology!
     Reply
    Annalee Newitz was starred Annalee Newitz was unstarred
    Image of BullfightsOnAcid BullfightsOnAcid
    12/08/09

    In reply to The Evolutionary Cost of Being Extremely Sexy
    "Baby, you are so hot. You are fecund to none."
     Reply
    BullfightsOnAcid was starred BullfightsOnAcid was unstarred
    Image of Dash_Stryker Dash_Stryker
    12/08/09

    In reply to The Evolutionary Cost of Being Extremely Sexy
    that's why skinny girls stop menstrating!
     Reply
    Dash_Stryker was starred Dash_Stryker was unstarred
    Image of Hahaue Hahaue
    12/08/09

    @Dash_Stryker: "Nothing tastes as good as thin feels."
     Reply
    SJ_Edwards promoted this comment Hahaue was starred Hahaue was unstarred
    Image of Vulcan Has No Moon Vulcan Has No Moon
    12/08/09

    @Hahaue: Kate Moss must have gone her entire life without tasting Belgian chocolates.
     Reply
    Vulcan Has No Moon was starred Vulcan Has No Moon was unstarred
    Image of drclaytonforrester drclaytonforrester
    12/08/09

    In reply to The Evolutionary Cost of Being Extremely Sexy
    This depresses me, as I keep wanting to go after the prettiest girl in town. And so do a lot of guys. What do we do, all band together and say, 'slow down, let's ease up here'? It kind of contradicts the natural tendency to be competitive. Very confusing and perplexing.

    Although friends of mine with 'less-than-perfect-looking' mates (whatever that means) have stellar, beautiful children - so I guess there is a lot to be said here for not having to go after the most attractive female in town. Still, it does conflict with males' brains' tendency to go after the pretty girl. Maybe finding a girl that you think is pretty yet not getting a seeming swarm of attention is the way to go. You know, pairings - everybody goes off with their pairings, in a couple -
     Reply
    EBone promoted this comment drclaytonforrester was starred drclaytonforrester was unstarred
    Image of EBone EBone
    12/08/09

    @drclaytonforrester: This article is about fruit flies. Nothing says it applies to human beings.
     Reply
    EBone was starred EBone was unstarred
    Image of MissBurlesque MissBurlesque
    12/08/09

    In reply to The Evolutionary Cost of Being Extremely Sexy
    uhh that "girl" is Lady Gaga.. just so you all know
     Reply
    Annalee Newitz promoted this comment Dash_Stryker approved this comment MissBurlesque was starred MissBurlesque was unstarred
    Image of Annalee Newitz Annalee Newitz
    12/08/09

    @MissBurlesque: yeah she's a lady so don't call her girl!

    I am completely obsessed with Lady Gaga right now.
     Reply
    Annalee Newitz was starred Annalee Newitz was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or io9 account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.