San Francisco, 10:47 AM
Thu Dec 10
27 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |
Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |
@Belabras: That's just what I was thinking. I'm really fascinated by the human system designs...those helicopters even have vine/wire cutters on the front of the rotor housings, which is a common feature today but one that most people never even see.
I think Phantom Menace scarred us all. The level of hype for that movie was too much, and no movie could have lived up to it. Of course, the movie itself turned out even worse than that, and so now we're all afraid of the same thing here, thus the huge backlash on this movie. If we keep our expectations lowered, then if the movie sucks, we can say "told you so", and if the movie is good, we'll be pleasantly surprised.
I just want a good sci-fi action flick, no more, no less, from a man who I have every confidence, based on past performances, that he knows how to provide that. I don't care if it "changes the way we view movies forever." So, I'm still looking forward to this and have my tickets already bought.
@TemporalSword: The budget combined with the director's pedigree and hiatus have all conspired to hype up the film. How can someone not be excited by a new freaking James Cameron sci-fi film?! It's hard to contain such hype.
Though I have my doubts about the movie in total, I love the designs, especially the creature aspect. The mechs in this flick make the APU's of The Matrix Revolutions look like total trash heaps.
It really confused me and a coworker when we were talking about this film because we each saw a different ending with out knowing there were different endings. Confusion quickly destroyed thanks to IMDB.
i have to disagree! even before i left the movie theater my mind was racing through a hundred different questions! where am i going to get lunch? how long was i asleep in there? why did i do what i did to myself... or did my girlfriend do it? what about the obnoxiously noisey people behind me - often heard by never seen? could they be headed to the same lunch spot as i? one part tex one part mex?
@ZaxxonQ.com: Yeah there are two different endings, there is the ending where Katie gets shot, and another ending which was the Steven Spielberg ending.
@justin0025: I did not see her get shot nor did I see her get turned into this beastie that they are going with. My ending was still different. I don't wanna spoil it.
@justin0025: There are multiple endings? Wow I guess I'm late to the party on this one. The ending I saw was the one in the first image in the gallery up there.
@aubreyf: The directors version has the girl kill the boy then the cops kill the girl. The Spielberg version has the girl kill the boy then the girl disappears.
@LittleDragon: Ah, I see. I thought it was a dig as Spielberg relating to it being a "happy" ending or something and it didn't make sense to me. I get it now!
Ugh. The idea that the demon has "bigger fish to fry" robs the story of all its good drama. Just because it is a demon doesn't mean it has grandiose machinations. Possessive demon with caveman mentality and antics latches on to human woman like a caveman would. Mine, mine, you no have her.
By making this demon into an Errol Flynn villain you have demonstrated to the world that you either: (a) can't let other people succeed without trying to participate yourself and/or (b) you missed the point entirely.
Either way, good luck Scott. I hope you don't fail nearly as hard as I think you will.
@Dr.Quatermass Sc.D: Purveyor of Truth, Disseminator of Lies:
"AVP 1 & 2 both sucked sucked sucked and they had no effect on the awesomeness that is the Alien franchise." - Yeah it did... you can pretty much rule out anything else in either series being made for some time now
"And look at Batman Forever and Batman & Robin. They didn't affect much more than their own reputation." - Wrong! Because of those two horrid movies, it took a lot of time and quite the effort to get WB to even contemplate the idea of another Batman movie.
Studios don't consider the fact that the movies they released were garbage. They just see that it tanked and conclude that no one is interested in the subject matter.
@karelj: Five years back, I would totally agree, but forums like these play an infinitely larger role in the development of movies these days. What we say here does have an effect, albeit small, and accordingly, companies gauge more than just the profits.
Hardly. I've wondered "what happens next" in movies where the monster "wins." After all, people have friends and family who aren't just going to let it slide. There are also these people with guns and badges who get a bit obsessed with unsolved deaths.
10:32 AM
10:12 AM
10:04 AM
09:55 AM
10:03 AM
09:54 AM
I think Phantom Menace scarred us all. The level of hype for that movie was too much, and no movie could have lived up to it. Of course, the movie itself turned out even worse than that, and so now we're all afraid of the same thing here, thus the huge backlash on this movie. If we keep our expectations lowered, then if the movie sucks, we can say "told you so", and if the movie is good, we'll be pleasantly surprised.
I just want a good sci-fi action flick, no more, no less, from a man who I have every confidence, based on past performances, that he knows how to provide that. I don't care if it "changes the way we view movies forever." So, I'm still looking forward to this and have my tickets already bought.
10:01 AM
09:42 AM
10:00 AM
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
uhhh... money?
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12:19 AM
12/09/09
By making this demon into an Errol Flynn villain you have demonstrated to the world that you either: (a) can't let other people succeed without trying to participate yourself and/or (b) you missed the point entirely.
Either way, good luck Scott. I hope you don't fail nearly as hard as I think you will.
12/09/09
If he fails wouldn't that end with what was a rich in flavor film to a bland tasteless peace of crap?
12/09/09
And look at Batman Forever and Batman & Robin. They didn't affect much more than their own reputation.
If this project fails, it will go down alone. Correction, it will go down along with the staff that thought it up.
12/09/09
"AVP 1 & 2 both sucked sucked sucked and they had no effect on the awesomeness that is the Alien franchise." - Yeah it did... you can pretty much rule out anything else in either series being made for some time now
"And look at Batman Forever and Batman & Robin. They didn't affect much more than their own reputation." - Wrong! Because of those two horrid movies, it took a lot of time and quite the effort to get WB to even contemplate the idea of another Batman movie.
Studios don't consider the fact that the movies they released were garbage. They just see that it tanked and conclude that no one is interested in the subject matter.
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
06:38 AM