Sometimes I start my writing because I have an idea for a cool moment where even I want to be jumping in my chair. Once I write it down I start working backward to figure out hot to get to that moment. Sometimes it helps to see my writing from a backwards POV. I've even considered doing a story something like the movie Memento where the whole thing is done with the scenes in reverse order.
@cletar: Realizing the character doesn't work is probably the hardest part. It isn't easy to take an honest look at your work and realize that you've screwed up.
@charliejane: Just out of curiosity, how many authors were asked to give an answer to this question (no names required), how many responded at all, how many responded "Not interested", "I don't have the time", "I'm really interested, but I don't have the time", "I don't care about my characters", "My dog ate your question"?
I haven't read any of these authors (for shame!) and I'm interested to see how their comments (and my subjective 'liking' of the authors, based on their comments) actually translates in to liking their work (and their characters), when I do.
BTW Was the question phrased with a gender orientation? The first thing I thought when I saw the strapline "She's dull, or He doesn't play well with others.", was James Cameron's (from Walter Hill) "You write dialogue for a guy and then change the name" about writing strong, interesting (on the screen?) female characters versus 'Hollywood handbags' [at [www.newyorker.com] (half way down starting "Hollywood..."), from [io9.com] ].
Pretty much all of his successful, resonant ("dollars is votes") characters (Terminator, Sarah Connor) are quintessentially 'dull' and definitely 'don't play well with others'.
Is this just a movie thing or do authors like to 'switcheroo' too, when the going gets tough?
@SJ_Edwards:
Of course, Orson Scott Card described Cameron as "cruel, selfish and unkind to all" [en.wikipedia.org] , how does this translate to authors?
@SJ_Edwards: Actually every single author I asked to help me out on this question got back to me. Which was really nice. The "she's dull, he doesn't play well with others" thing was just me trying to say it could be a male or female character having this problem.....
@Charlie Jane Anders: Thanks!
Another good reason to read these authors :)
[Still like to know if they'd ever used a gender switch 'as', or 'as the start of' the solution to this 'problem'.
Not just to switchback the reader's preconceptions and expectations of the character, but their own as well, as a means of breaking good.]
Characters are supposed to be facets of the author's consciousness. So if a character needs a serious kickstart... go get your freak on?
An eighth of cubensis, a gourd rattle, and an old Smith-Corona?
@gods-n-clods: Amen brother. I see dull characters as a fault of the author to see the potential of a character. It's the difference between watching Adam West play himself in Family Guy, which is awesome... and watching him play a dictator in Nation Lampoon's Ratko. (Horrible movie btw, avoid it like the plague) Both have the potential... but one is the product of a weak writer.
A little "inspiration"... in whatever form it may take... is just what the doctor ordered for most. Looking at things from a different angle always helps.
If a character is just horrible... an utter drag on the narrative... (which can and does happen... not all plans work out) sometimes the best thing is to consolidate them into another character.
For example, you can have a character who's major role is to question the captain at a critical moment disappear if you plague him with self doubt. A character who's role is to be a mindless thug working against the hero? Nuke him and suddenly a trusted aid is a double agent.
This can usually be done with a little thoughtful editing, but it has to be handled with care. The last thing you want is a character who is written one way 90% and suddenly changes in the final chapter.
funny.you guys keep putting up cover art from old pulps and i own all of the pulps you took images of.this one you showed is from 1949 or 50 and it is a thrilling wonder quaterly.all or most of the stories came from earlier thrilling wonders or science wonder or wonder stories issues.lots of the reprints came from the 1930's era.
NOTE:
C.A.Smith story is perfect example as that one was from an early Wonder Stories (I OWN) and it is an oversize pulp from 1930 or 31.
Had the pleasure of meeting him twice, and he's a very enthusiastic, very supportive person, who gives good advice. I have his book on writing, which is where a lot of this comes from.
I don't know why but I always think that Ray Bradbury is dead...and then I read something like this and I smile because I'm glad he isn't dead...
I'll have forgotten all this by tomorrow.
@braak: You are, as usual, completely correct.: I think giant sideburns are part of the "classic science fiction author" uniform. Even Andre Norton used to sport them, although hers were made of yak fur.
@braak: You are, as usual, completely correct.: Don't you always wear your lab coat when writing science fiction? It's the standard uniform -- read up on it the SFWA membership rules.
@braak: I was also alarmed by the shots of him stowing an empty Coors can with many others on the counter, grabbing what seemed like a slice of meat or cheese or maybe cookie dough (?) and then grabbing another Coors from the fridge.
But then I thought about it and I was like you know what? When I'm 80 years old, I'm going to fucking wear a lab coat with tennis shorts and eat cookie dough too. Fuck yeah.
@Annalee Newitz: What's wrong with a wedge of cheese and half a dozen cans of beer? I don't know what YOU have for breakfast, but I see nothing wrong here...
@braak: You are, as usual, completely correct.: I always thought he was going for the Martin Van Buren look. It was all the rage when Bradbury was a child.
Brad Meltzer's comments remind me of a conversation i had with my editor earlier today (he's currently going over a new story of mine) he told me "it's a great story! but we need to have a talk, you really need an editor."
and than i found myself wondering what he does all day....
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
I haven't read any of these authors (for shame!) and I'm interested to see how their comments (and my subjective 'liking' of the authors, based on their comments) actually translates in to liking their work (and their characters), when I do.
BTW Was the question phrased with a gender orientation? The first thing I thought when I saw the strapline "She's dull, or He doesn't play well with others.", was James Cameron's (from Walter Hill) "You write dialogue for a guy and then change the name" about writing strong, interesting (on the screen?) female characters versus 'Hollywood handbags' [at [www.newyorker.com] (half way down starting "Hollywood..."), from [io9.com] ].
Pretty much all of his successful, resonant ("dollars is votes") characters (Terminator, Sarah Connor) are quintessentially 'dull' and definitely 'don't play well with others'.
Is this just a movie thing or do authors like to 'switcheroo' too, when the going gets tough?
11/19/09
Of course, Orson Scott Card described Cameron as "cruel, selfish and unkind to all" [en.wikipedia.org] , how does this translate to authors?
Just asking :)
11/19/09
11/19/09
Another good reason to read these authors :)
[Still like to know if they'd ever used a gender switch 'as', or 'as the start of' the solution to this 'problem'.
Not just to switchback the reader's preconceptions and expectations of the character, but their own as well, as a means of breaking good.]
11/19/09
An eighth of cubensis, a gourd rattle, and an old Smith-Corona?
11/19/09
A little "inspiration"... in whatever form it may take... is just what the doctor ordered for most. Looking at things from a different angle always helps.
If a character is just horrible... an utter drag on the narrative... (which can and does happen... not all plans work out) sometimes the best thing is to consolidate them into another character.
For example, you can have a character who's major role is to question the captain at a critical moment disappear if you plague him with self doubt. A character who's role is to be a mindless thug working against the hero? Nuke him and suddenly a trusted aid is a double agent.
This can usually be done with a little thoughtful editing, but it has to be handled with care. The last thing you want is a character who is written one way 90% and suddenly changes in the final chapter.
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
Had to do that with a character I liked but didn't fit.
11/19/09
11/19/09
NOTE:
C.A.Smith story is perfect example as that one was from an early Wonder Stories (I OWN) and it is an oversize pulp from 1930 or 31.
11/19/09
11/19/09
Link:
[io9.com]
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
I'll have forgotten all this by tomorrow.
11/19/09
1) Science Fiction.
2) Good.
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
And after Labor Day no less! The nerve.
11/19/09
11/19/09
/grandpasimpson
11/19/09
But then I thought about it and I was like you know what? When I'm 80 years old, I'm going to fucking wear a lab coat with tennis shorts and eat cookie dough too. Fuck yeah.
11/19/09
So I'm ahead of the curve then?
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/18/09
and than i found myself wondering what he does all day....