"because no contemporary woman would ever dress like this."
Clearly the expert quoted has never been to Cardiff, for as far as I was able to tell, there ain't much to do there except cosplay. To wit: this photograph I took at the Millenium Centre last month.
@Brine: I hope that the Google van drives through San Francisco next year during the Dickens Fair, so that we can have hundreds of "ghostly figures" in Street View.
Did the people calling for examination not look at the picture? The legs aren't missing because of extradimensional ghostiness, the picture just wasn't cropped together very well.
Unless those are also ghostly parking poles and ghostly brick patterns, in which case I respectfully retract my pessimism.
@Balius: Those are ghostly parking poles from the great parking pole massacre of 1872. A tragic story, so many innocent parking poles slaughtered . . .
When the lake bed was dry? When exactly would that have been? As I recall, the Great Lakes were supposed to have been carved into the ground by glaciers. The only way all that ice would have been emptied out of the lake beds was when it melted...at which point it should have _become_ the lake (remember, when a glacier "retreats", it's not actually flowing back the way it came, but rather the leading edge is either melting or sublimating). And anything that was standing prior to the glacial carving would certainly no longer be arranged the way they had originally been erected before thousnads of tons of ice flowed through and carved huge canyons in the ground.
Now, since glaciers aren't _just_ ice, I'd say it's safe to say that there were probably a bunch of gigantic boulders caught up in the ice flow, which would have gone straight to the lake bed when the glacier melted. It's possible that a boulder that took this ride could have had carvings on it before it joined the glacier, but any carvings should have been obliterated by the glacial ice flow.
So, the reason this was announced to little fanfare was because it is completely illogical to believe that a true stonehenge-like arrangement of stones would have survived to end up on the lake bed. It also wouldn't make a lot of sense that people with no interaction with the druids would have erected something that appears to have been unique to their culture.
09/27/09
Hm. Long coat. Absurdly long scarf. Mop of curly hair on top of the head...
All that's missing is a little robotic dog shaped like a toaster.
03/27/09
03/27/09
03/27/09
Clearly the expert quoted has never been to Cardiff, for as far as I was able to tell, there ain't much to do there except cosplay. To wit: this photograph I took at the Millenium Centre last month.
03/27/09
And if that fails, [2.bp.blogspot.com]
03/27/09
I guess the internet is just not ready for Welsh Ghost humor.
03/27/09
By the bye, have you been to deaddaffyddhahaha.com?
Hysterical!
03/27/09
03/27/09
Shoot. Am I mixing up fiction with real life again?
03/27/09
03/27/09
I dont know if dracula has been listed on google maps yet, but maybe it's worth a look?
03/27/09
03/27/09
03/27/09
03/27/09
False.
03/27/09
03/27/09
Unless those are also ghostly parking poles and ghostly brick patterns, in which case I respectfully retract my pessimism.
03/27/09
03/27/09
03/27/09
Next.
03/27/09
03/27/09
CAUSED BY GOOGLE TRYING TO COVER UP SOMETHING.
03/27/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
Now, since glaciers aren't _just_ ice, I'd say it's safe to say that there were probably a bunch of gigantic boulders caught up in the ice flow, which would have gone straight to the lake bed when the glacier melted. It's possible that a boulder that took this ride could have had carvings on it before it joined the glacier, but any carvings should have been obliterated by the glacial ice flow.
So, the reason this was announced to little fanfare was because it is completely illogical to believe that a true stonehenge-like arrangement of stones would have survived to end up on the lake bed. It also wouldn't make a lot of sense that people with no interaction with the druids would have erected something that appears to have been unique to their culture.
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09