San Francisco, 2:28 PM
Thu Dec 10
27 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |
Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |
@LittleDragon: I have to admit it's probably my favorite show on television right now. Whenever I'm in a bad mood or not feeling well I start looking up clips on YouTube.
When it comes to mag-lev train safety, I know of only one accident in the history of mag-lev, and that was caused by a conventional truck hitting the underside of a German elevated track. But it was ugly.
Two problems:
One criticism of diets high in animal proteins is that we eat the animals who have to eat a large amount of vegetation which is wasteful as opposed to just eating the vegetation.
Farmed fish are not as popular amongst environmentalist as you might think. Salmon, for instance, have been accused of affecting the population of wild salmon, being more contaminated (with PCB's for instance) since there dietmay be contaminated and they don't range as wide and are not as rich in Omega-3 FA's as wild.
Funny, now this post looks like one where somebody complains that wind power turbines kill migrating birds.
Well, the good news is farming vegetation under the sea is a kinch, the japanese have been doing it for centuries. Hawaiian tourists may not have a taste for it though.
As for the under sea protein farming, it's true, the current methods involve such massive levels of growth hormones and waste material that fish farms need to move every few years because the area around them is too poisonous to continue growing fish in. I hope somebody figures that out properly one of these days.
There was an oyster farm by my old summer cabin, and as such I can happily say they require no artificial feed like salmon farms do, and are just as simple to maintain. I guess there's a fair bit of hope after all.
@CParis: I don't know, some is OK. Catfish is pretty much all farmed and is not bad but it's hard to find anything but farmed north of the mason dixon line to compare it to. I don't much care for Tilapia - it has a metallic aftertaste to me. I'll eat farmed salmon but wild caught King, Keta or Coho - especially from the Copper River - has far more flavor and is worth the extra cost.
What's worse yet is that the unemployment figures aren't accurate. They only show the number of people currently drawing on unemployment and don't take into account the number of people that couldn't find a job since their unemployment has run out or that have been forced into taking two lower paying jobs and still can't make their bills.
@â™ Final â™ : You forgot those that just gave up looking for work so the percentage out of work is even higher. The number purportedly is around 17% give or take.
@â™ Final â™ : On the other hand, it doesn't account for recipients who shouldn't be receiving unemployment, e.g. people who don't need the $360/week or who are employed & get paid off the books. Lots of relatively wealthy layoffs & service industry workers take unemployment when they don't need it.
@â™ Final â™ : The unemployment rate doesn't count people who are under-employed (part-timers), or minors and students, or "discouraged workers", or those on unpaid leave, or certain family members who work in a family business, or people on furlough, or those in job training.
Depending on the source, the real unemployment rate is probably between 18-20%.
@mxmarks: That's the North Slope where they extract oil. Besides the usual drilling operations, they've been doing a bunch of maintenance on the pipeline.
They've had incentive since gas rose two years ago to $4.00 plus a gallon and never went back down to $1.25 a gallon.
@tetracycloide: I don't think he alone is responsible, but his administration is, to a large extent. And since the president is "where the buck ends", it is not unreasonable to shorthand the blame to him.
@Roklimber: i think it would be more accurate to say that it's easier to consign the blame to a single individual or office; not only does that provide an effective rhetorical scapegoat it also makes solving the problem seem easier than it really is.
@tetracycloide: I agree with you. I also agreed with you on your previous post.
This raises the question of whether the president is really where the buck ends.
My (admittedly poor) knowledge of the American political system tells me that the president doesn't actually make the final decision on everything. There are the Congress and the Senate as well.
Regardless, the point is that 8 years of the Bush administration's continuous blundering and inexcusable warring is the cause of our situation today.
My recollection is that by the end of Clinton's second term, the US had a surplus in the trillions. By the end of Bush's second term, the US was in the mess it is now.
@Roklimber: I agree that the buck needs to stop somewhere and that somewhere tends to be the President. In the case of Bush, his party had power in the Congress during most of his term so saying that he had ultimate responsibility I feel is an apt description. There is a difference between responsibility and fault though.
Congress is the body that voted to deregulate the financial institutions so they could make the bad loans. Yes Bush didn't make that call, but he could have Vetoed the bill. Bush is also in charge of choosing those that control the Regulators that were left.
While I feel personally that this is the fault of deregulation that has been occurring for the last 25 years (and all of the administrations during that time) being the one "On Watch" when the event happens means something.
@Roklimber: Oh and one more thing (and this isn't to nit pick, it is to educate) the Senate is part of Congress. The Congress has two parts, the Senate (two reps per state no matter the population) and the House of Representatives (number of reps per state dependent on pop).
You may not even live in USA so you may not care, but I find a lot of people who live here who don't know this.
Reagan's pro-corporation programs are at the core. Deregulation ( some was good ), anti-union, private equity run amok, CEO compensation run rampant, these pull investment dollars out of the companies The inequity of wage increases leave the majority stagnant.
Isn't this the same guy that wanted to save money in school lunches by saying ketchup was a vegetable?
They talk about the poor insurance companies suffering at the hands of the public option.
Letting corporations act as if they had the same rights that individual Americans do.
We've reached the tipping point on the scale but there has to be so much more pain for people to really demand change.
@tetracycloide: Definition of insanity: repeating the same action and expecting a different result. Like sitting back and letting a deregulated financial industry run wild, and then being surprised that they leverage themselves until they crash and take us all down with them. See: S&L scandal, current economic crisis.
@tetracycloide:
There is no temporal nor causitive connection between the unemployment rates shown, and the perceived "europeanness" of adopted economic policies.
Further, your initial statement is itself based on a logical fallacy, namely Questionable Cause. As well, your latest post is, itself, built upon an Appeal to Spite fallacy.
11:49 AM
11:50 AM
11:05 AM
12:54 PM
10:38 AM
11:49 AM
10:31 AM
12/09/09
12/09/09
One criticism of diets high in animal proteins is that we eat the animals who have to eat a large amount of vegetation which is wasteful as opposed to just eating the vegetation.
Farmed fish are not as popular amongst environmentalist as you might think. Salmon, for instance, have been accused of affecting the population of wild salmon, being more contaminated (with PCB's for instance) since there dietmay be contaminated and they don't range as wide and are not as rich in Omega-3 FA's as wild.
Funny, now this post looks like one where somebody complains that wind power turbines kill migrating birds.
12/09/09
Well, the good news is farming vegetation under the sea is a kinch, the japanese have been doing it for centuries. Hawaiian tourists may not have a taste for it though.
As for the under sea protein farming, it's true, the current methods involve such massive levels of growth hormones and waste material that fish farms need to move every few years because the area around them is too poisonous to continue growing fish in. I hope somebody figures that out properly one of these days.
12/09/09
12/09/09
There was an oyster farm by my old summer cabin, and as such I can happily say they require no artificial feed like salmon farms do, and are just as simple to maintain. I guess there's a fair bit of hope after all.
05:02 AM
Better than seaweed, I guess.
07:28 AM
08:05 AM
Most farmed fish tastes pretty nasty, too.
08:13 AM
09:27 AM
Gotta agree on the King salmon. I avoid most farmed fish - just too bland for me.
12/09/09
That's good since the islands will probably be underwater anyway in a few decades.
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
Depending on the source, the real unemployment rate is probably between 18-20%.
12/09/09
Just out of curiosity, any idea what happened up there in this span?
12/09/09
12/09/09
They've had incentive since gas rose two years ago to $4.00 plus a gallon and never went back down to $1.25 a gallon.
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
This raises the question of whether the president is really where the buck ends.
My (admittedly poor) knowledge of the American political system tells me that the president doesn't actually make the final decision on everything. There are the Congress and the Senate as well.
Regardless, the point is that 8 years of the Bush administration's continuous blundering and inexcusable warring is the cause of our situation today.
My recollection is that by the end of Clinton's second term, the US had a surplus in the trillions. By the end of Bush's second term, the US was in the mess it is now.
It's that simple.
12/09/09
Congress is the body that voted to deregulate the financial institutions so they could make the bad loans. Yes Bush didn't make that call, but he could have Vetoed the bill. Bush is also in charge of choosing those that control the Regulators that were left.
While I feel personally that this is the fault of deregulation that has been occurring for the last 25 years (and all of the administrations during that time) being the one "On Watch" when the event happens means something.
12/09/09
You may not even live in USA so you may not care, but I find a lot of people who live here who don't know this.
12/09/09
12/09/09
Reagan's pro-corporation programs are at the core. Deregulation ( some was good ), anti-union, private equity run amok, CEO compensation run rampant, these pull investment dollars out of the companies The inequity of wage increases leave the majority stagnant.
Isn't this the same guy that wanted to save money in school lunches by saying ketchup was a vegetable?
They talk about the poor insurance companies suffering at the hands of the public option.
Letting corporations act as if they had the same rights that individual Americans do.
We've reached the tipping point on the scale but there has to be so much more pain for people to really demand change.
12/09/09
12/09/09
what's the definition of insanity again?
12/09/09
12/09/09
@Barnabus: straw man
this is going to be fun! first person to post an actual point devoid of logical falacies wins a prize!
12/09/09
There is no temporal nor causitive connection between the unemployment rates shown, and the perceived "europeanness" of adopted economic policies.
Further, your initial statement is itself based on a logical fallacy, namely Questionable Cause. As well, your latest post is, itself, built upon an Appeal to Spite fallacy.
Thank you for your time.