San Francisco, 8:59 PM
Fri Dec 11
30 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |
Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |
@Klebert L. Hall: He obviously does more with his life than navel-gaze. If that's all it takes to get paid, then I would be a billionaire godking by now.
So basically you are saying that it's a waste of time to try and imagine how things could be, where things might be heading? Why are you here?
@Bill-Lee: They may not lie. But half the time they aren't right. Just look at 1984 and 2001: A Space Odyssey. It's been 8 years since I found that obelisk and I'm still not a space fetus.
@Valkyrie Ice: Uh, yeah...I was making a joke. My comment was a play on words since one of his books is called "The Singularity is Near". And really, when you think about it, 2045 is pretty near...well within the lifetime of most of this blog's readers.
@LittleDragon: I have to admit it's probably my favorite show on television right now. Whenever I'm in a bad mood or not feeling well I start looking up clips on YouTube.
When it comes to mag-lev train safety, I know of only one accident in the history of mag-lev, and that was caused by a conventional truck hitting the underside of a German elevated track. But it was ugly.
@MonkeyT: Actually, there are hundreds of mag-lev accidents every year but the extreme Gauss fields erase the survivor's memories and destroy any electronic media of the incident...in fact...what was I saying again?
Two problems:
One criticism of diets high in animal proteins is that we eat the animals who have to eat a large amount of vegetation which is wasteful as opposed to just eating the vegetation.
Farmed fish are not as popular amongst environmentalist as you might think. Salmon, for instance, have been accused of affecting the population of wild salmon, being more contaminated (with PCB's for instance) since there dietmay be contaminated and they don't range as wide and are not as rich in Omega-3 FA's as wild.
Funny, now this post looks like one where somebody complains that wind power turbines kill migrating birds.
Well, the good news is farming vegetation under the sea is a kinch, the japanese have been doing it for centuries. Hawaiian tourists may not have a taste for it though.
As for the under sea protein farming, it's true, the current methods involve such massive levels of growth hormones and waste material that fish farms need to move every few years because the area around them is too poisonous to continue growing fish in. I hope somebody figures that out properly one of these days.
There was an oyster farm by my old summer cabin, and as such I can happily say they require no artificial feed like salmon farms do, and are just as simple to maintain. I guess there's a fair bit of hope after all.
@CParis: I don't know, some is OK. Catfish is pretty much all farmed and is not bad but it's hard to find anything but farmed north of the mason dixon line to compare it to. I don't much care for Tilapia - it has a metallic aftertaste to me. I'll eat farmed salmon but wild caught King, Keta or Coho - especially from the Copper River - has far more flavor and is worth the extra cost.
11:58 AM
"futurism" is "this might happen".
"science fiction" is "if this happens, this will be the consequences".
"fantasy" is "this will never happen, but what fun anyway".
None of them are "this will happen", and any attempt to do so even in the short term pretty much sucks at it.
11:01 AM
01:12 PM
10:11 AM
-Kle.
11:33 AM
So basically you are saying that it's a waste of time to try and imagine how things could be, where things might be heading? Why are you here?
09:46 AM
-Kle.
09:32 AM
"WTF?"
08:50 AM
08:42 AM
12/10/09
12/10/09
12/10/09
12/10/09
12/10/09
12/10/09
12:43 AM
12:56 AM
12/10/09
12/10/09
12/10/09
12/10/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
One criticism of diets high in animal proteins is that we eat the animals who have to eat a large amount of vegetation which is wasteful as opposed to just eating the vegetation.
Farmed fish are not as popular amongst environmentalist as you might think. Salmon, for instance, have been accused of affecting the population of wild salmon, being more contaminated (with PCB's for instance) since there dietmay be contaminated and they don't range as wide and are not as rich in Omega-3 FA's as wild.
Funny, now this post looks like one where somebody complains that wind power turbines kill migrating birds.
12/09/09
Well, the good news is farming vegetation under the sea is a kinch, the japanese have been doing it for centuries. Hawaiian tourists may not have a taste for it though.
As for the under sea protein farming, it's true, the current methods involve such massive levels of growth hormones and waste material that fish farms need to move every few years because the area around them is too poisonous to continue growing fish in. I hope somebody figures that out properly one of these days.
12/09/09
12/09/09
There was an oyster farm by my old summer cabin, and as such I can happily say they require no artificial feed like salmon farms do, and are just as simple to maintain. I guess there's a fair bit of hope after all.
12/10/09
Better than seaweed, I guess.
12/10/09
12/10/09
Most farmed fish tastes pretty nasty, too.
12/10/09
12/10/09
Gotta agree on the King salmon. I avoid most farmed fish - just too bland for me.
12/09/09
That's good since the islands will probably be underwater anyway in a few decades.
12/09/09
12/09/09
Hawaii's famed white sandy beaches are shrinking
[news.yahoo.com]
12/10/09