It's worrying that scientists are willing to fuck with the natural order of things like this, but then again, industry has been doing the same thing (with a less honourable motive) for ages. So who knows? Nautue, let us manipulate you.
The dust storm was the most exciting thing to happen around these Sydney-parts for a long time. It was crazy how everyone just woke up, looked at the thick, bright orange sky and went 'huh, would you look at that? The sky is orange,' then headed off to work as if nothing was up.
I personally woke up and started getting excited about the imminent apocolypse.
sounds interesting to me.hey it can't be any worse than the damn polutants we keep spewing into the enviroment.this is an example of "good polution" i guess.
DIRT POLLUTION !!!!
I hope global warming (or climate change) is a problem for a long time. Not because I hate the earth, I just want to make sure the activists are occupied. Without something to stop or save they are listless.
I'm reminded of the the character in Tales of the City (About SF in the 70s) where the guy's girlfriend joins the Israeli army because she couldn't deal with Viet Nam being over. Couldn't be happy without a cause to get involved in.
The problem is over due it and you get a massive deadzone like in the Gulf of Mexico west of the Mississippi river. The problem is the algae bloom dies and as it decays it sucks the oxygen out of the water. This makes the zone unable to support life.
@Dayburner: We may be facing something similar here in the San Francisco Bay. After over 150 years the last of all the sediment from the runoff of gold mining in the Sierras is finally washing out to sea. Life in the bay struggled and succeeded in adjusting to the murkier waters and now it may have to adapt to clearer conditions as "nature originally intended". An algae bloom is a serious and dangerous possibility here.
This is exactly how God planned everything, the soil becomes too dry due to drought caused by "global warming" and blows into the ocean which in turn counteracts global warming causes. Everything work out fine if we just stay the hell out of the way and let nature run it's course.
It's too damn cold here for me to believe in global warming.
@tmittan01000001002003004: Of course, by the time the climate is changed enough to have massive, widespread droughts, you will have killed off all the species that lived in those regions, raised the sea level to flood coastal, and disrupted countless other ecosystems beyond any hope of recovery. But sure, call that "working out fine" while you sit in your air conditioned room and blithely condemn the natural world to destruction because it's "what God wanted".
This is crazy--no one should be allowed to do this without at least international consultation.
The truth is that we really don't know what this will do to the oceans, or the planet. These are very complex systems; these brute force solutions are bound to have unforeseen consequences.
"You live in a desert!
You know what it's going to a be
a hundred years from now?
It's going to be a ------- desert!
We have deserts in America
we just don't live in them!"
There are probably upsides and downsides to this idea. What I can't comprehend is people who argue that the way the climate naturally changes is in some sense superior to human-guided change. The climate doesn't have a mind or a plan, and it doesn't change in ways that are meant to do good or bad. It just happens. The Sahara doesn't "need" to be a desert. It just happens to be one. This is good for some species, and bad for others. But unlike the blind forces of nature, human scientists can weigh the pros and cons, and make plans to carry out changes that will improve things in the long run.
Today, we have the power to change the climate, for good or ill. Abdicating this responsibility is a choice with consequences, just as trying to use this ability for good is a choice with consequences. Pretending that somehow, the blind forces of nature "know best" is just a way of running away from our responsibilities, and of ignoring the power we now have, which is a dangerous way of thinking.
@ParryLost: Yes, but if something goes horribly wrong, then humans have to take responsibility for that, and we can always say that humans ought to have known better.
If the climate does it, fate, well, then the results may be tragic, but there's no one to get mad at, no one to hate--it's just the way things turned out.
I remember seeing this in Disney's "Eyes in Outer Space", which was released 50 years ago. After the animated weather control sequence, Paul Frees intoned how we can turn "useless" deserts and polar ice caps into pleasant farmland. Frickin' around with the environment isn't really a new or radical concept.
Given that a desert's borders are always in flux, I'm in principle opposed to reclaiming land from it. I am opposed to whiping it out entirely, since the desert also serves its purposes. My biggest concern is over what they plan on using to reclaim it. Introducing species just makes bigger problems in the end.
10/08/09
The dust storm was the most exciting thing to happen around these Sydney-parts for a long time. It was crazy how everyone just woke up, looked at the thick, bright orange sky and went 'huh, would you look at that? The sky is orange,' then headed off to work as if nothing was up.
I personally woke up and started getting excited about the imminent apocolypse.
10/08/09
DIRT POLLUTION !!!!
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
I'm reminded of the the character in Tales of the City (About SF in the 70s) where the guy's girlfriend joins the Israeli army because she couldn't deal with Viet Nam being over. Couldn't be happy without a cause to get involved in.
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
[serc.carleton.edu]
10/08/09
10/08/09
It's too damn cold here for me to believe in global warming.
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
ian jones: Me am fixing climate! no am play gods!
10/08/09
10/08/09
The truth is that we really don't know what this will do to the oceans, or the planet. These are very complex systems; these brute force solutions are bound to have unforeseen consequences.
10/08/09
Yup. But then again, that's what BOINC projects are for. Maybe we can actually figure this stuff out, before we do something stupid.
09/18/09
You know what it's going to a be
a hundred years from now?
It's going to be a ------- desert!
We have deserts in America
we just don't live in them!"
09/16/09
Today, we have the power to change the climate, for good or ill. Abdicating this responsibility is a choice with consequences, just as trying to use this ability for good is a choice with consequences. Pretending that somehow, the blind forces of nature "know best" is just a way of running away from our responsibilities, and of ignoring the power we now have, which is a dangerous way of thinking.
09/16/09
If the climate does it, fate, well, then the results may be tragic, but there's no one to get mad at, no one to hate--it's just the way things turned out.
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
(I was seriously going to pitch a fit if the first comment wasn't a Dune joke, and now it's a random Harvey Birdman joke.)
09/16/09
09/16/09
Given that a desert's borders are always in flux, I'm in principle opposed to reclaiming land from it. I am opposed to whiping it out entirely, since the desert also serves its purposes. My biggest concern is over what they plan on using to reclaim it. Introducing species just makes bigger problems in the end.