I watched a PBS special about this theory. and they demonstrated how an impact crater wouldn't be found. Many times comets themselves are pieces of rock, gas, and ice..instead of one large whole piece of rock. So if one were to enter the atmosphere, it wouldn't be like an asteroid that would leave a large crater. instead it would be like tossing pea gravel onto sand, but obviously on a much larger scale. Thus leaving many shallow craters that could easily fill with sediment over time.
I ♥ Bitchy Trampolines promoted this comment
Edited by acrobatic rabbit at 07/22/09 11:40 AM
acrobatic rabbit was starred
acrobatic rabbit was unstarred
@neolex: No, it's really "international", though, NASA did most of the heavy lifting and incurred a much larger share of the cost. Remember that it was in development for several years as Space Station Freedom/Alpha before it became the International Space Station. And those shuttle launches aren't cheap.
What does it matter? The whole thing gets chucked into the ocean in 8 years anyway. Which NASA gets sole responsibility for, BTW. Then you can call it NASA's $100,000,000,000+ Giant Hunk of Falling Garbage.
Actually, you could call it that now if you ask me.
Idiotic policy to kill a platform well before its time because the previous chimp in office didn't want to share toys with others and instead wanted to yank us away from hard science and towards playacting GI Joes on the moon. Which, inevitably, will be strangled on the vine due to budget cuts anyway. A BIG win for anti-science.
Should reboot, focus on the station and unmanned missions, more Hubbles, etc.
@ZanipoloLebron: technically all shockwaves are pressure. But that's a rapidly rising mass of hot gas pushing aside water vapour that's being rapidly condensed.
Umm, how exactly does this qualify as 'the missing link'? I see a long tail, five digits on the hands and feet -- nothing that differs greatly from the modern-day lemur. This only possibly proves that lemurs were able to get their asses fossilized just like everything else back then.
Sometimes, it seems like scientists are grasping at straws in their race to publicize that they have all of the answers. We ALL know that more research is required before heavy claims like these can be made. Remember what they said about brontosauruses and the planet Pluto?
@Pope John Peeps II: "The link sends you directly to an academic paper on this exact subject, so if you want to know why it's important, just read it."
Or, God buried her there to test us. And you failed. Shameful.
I shall go back to sticking my thumbs in my ears now. My thumbs, of course, which did NOT evolve from a creature very similar to if not directly from this here "specimen" (read: devil test).
07/22/09
07/22/09
07/22/09
07/22/09
07/22/09
06/23/09
06/22/09
'Luckily, NASA's International Space Station was watching.'
Since when did NASA solely own the ISS; or is the word 'International' just a PR bye line?
06/23/09
What does it matter? The whole thing gets chucked into the ocean in 8 years anyway. Which NASA gets sole responsibility for, BTW. Then you can call it NASA's $100,000,000,000+ Giant Hunk of Falling Garbage.
Actually, you could call it that now if you ask me.
06/23/09
Idiotic policy to kill a platform well before its time because the previous chimp in office didn't want to share toys with others and instead wanted to yank us away from hard science and towards playacting GI Joes on the moon. Which, inevitably, will be strangled on the vine due to budget cuts anyway. A BIG win for anti-science.
Should reboot, focus on the station and unmanned missions, more Hubbles, etc.
06/22/09
Sorry, every time volcanoes are posted and tagged geoporn...
06/22/09
06/22/09
06/22/09
06/22/09
06/17/09
05/19/09
Sometimes, it seems like scientists are grasping at straws in their race to publicize that they have all of the answers. We ALL know that more research is required before heavy claims like these can be made. Remember what they said about brontosauruses and the planet Pluto?
05/19/09
But I don't think anyone save an actual paleontologist is going to know what is important and not important.
Unless you happen to know what a "toilet claw" is, or the "haplorhine diversification". Which you don't.
05/19/09
05/19/09
05/19/09
Why would he do that????????
05/19/09
If it's MY ancestor, that sentence would read: "Bacon".
05/19/09
I shall go back to sticking my thumbs in my ears now. My thumbs, of course, which did NOT evolve from a creature very similar to if not directly from this here "specimen" (read: devil test).
05/19/09
Seriously, at this fucking point people like you actually bring up creationism MORE than ACTUAL CREATIONISTS.
05/19/09
05/19/09
05/19/09
04/01/09