Well, if actual mysterious fires do take place in the house, it's pretty clearly not a safe place to live in, any supernatural explanations be damned. The whole thing sounds more like random bursts of electromagnetism, though it would be interesting to know what causes it.
I wonder if some scientist would be interested enough, and not put off by the paranormal babble to put some sensors in the place, and see if there's anything unusual in the place, or if it's just a pyromaniac's hoax. #ghosts
In the US we would have Ty Pennington come out and build them a new house in the same spot in under a week. They could make it a two hour episode. #ghosts
Edited by Belabras: now with Kung Fu grip! at 11/04/09 8:47 AM
Belabras: now with Kung Fu grip! was starred
Belabras: now with Kung Fu grip! was unstarred
That's what happens when you build a house on an old American-Indian burial ground. Let that be a lessons to all those Czech who scoff at such warnings. #ghosts
There was an exorcism performed on a room in my dorm this year. Upside of Catholic university, we got supernatural badasses running around busting those ghosts. #ghosts
@ggodo, the man from R.O.A.C.H.: Please tell me they're a group of really cool almost priests or something like that and they solve paranormal mysteries on the side? And that one of them is a guy under thirty and really cute. :P #ghosts
@Sunshineyness: Well, one of them is just over thirty? and they're mostly just really cool priests. As far as the side work, they mostly pull crazy pranks on each other. These are the greatest priests ever. #ghosts
I am so upset about this! Being Human is my favorite televison show right now. I saw all six episodes on BBC America and purchased the first series from Amazon UK. I love Mitchell, George, and Annie to death. I don't know why SyFy doesn't show the UK series like it did with Dr. Who and The Sara Jane Adventures.
I hate the majority of US televison shows. The actors and actresses with few exceptions are pretty and vapid. They just cannot act. Too many female characters are portrayed as fashion-obsessed airheads. The males are portrayed as douchebags.
The actors and actresses in the UK look more like real people. "Spaced" was the first televison show I could actually relate to as a female geek. I am Black and there are no Black geek characters on US televison except that horrible Urkle character from "Family Matters". "The IT Crowd" is a UK show has a Black geek character named Marcus Moss.
I hate shows like "Desperate Housewives" , "Girlfriends", and "Gossip Girl". "Ugly Betty" is the only US show I actually bother to watch.
I read they are planning to remake "Shameless" which is one of my other favorite UK shows. The very "Britishness" is what makes shows like "Being Human" and "Shameless" unique. Americans know so little about other cultures. We have to "Americanize" everything. This madness has to end! #beinghuman
As someone who didn't think that the US Life on Mars was a "dismal translation" I am willing to give this a chance rather than outright dismiss it. #beinghuman
I'm very, very tired of American producers deciding that if something is good, we should make an American version of it.
How about, if something is good, you release it in the states? Doctor Who has found a gigantic following here, so much so that BBC America has started airing things concurrently. So why can't SyFy just buy Being Human's syndication rights and air it here instead of trying to make it over again?
I feel the same way about the Americanized version of Top Gear that keeps faltering here in the states. Top Gear can't be brought over because there can be no imitation of it. It's those three hosts and that format specifically that makes the how what it is.
I haven't seen Being Human yet, but I imagine it's the same way. British networks air American shows instead of making their own versions, don't they? Aside from game shows I mean. I'm sure that they loved Stargate and Babylon 5 just as much even though it wasn't made on their shores. Can't we return the favor?
@Tomb: R.O.A.C.H.: No, I don't think so. An American remake of Dr. Who would cause a nerd uprising the likes of which mankind has never seen, and likely wouldn't survive from. #beinghuman
Ok, so I'll call bullshit on a SyFy version of Being Human being a bad thing.
First: if there's one thing SyFy can actually do in it's scripted shows, it's finding actors with some sort of unique charisma and fitting them together with unique chemistry.
Say what you want about the network's shows, but the casts have all had chemistry. We'll start with SG-1, which granted, wasn't originally pulled together by Sci-Fi, and ditto with Farscape, which was technically put together by Jim Henson studios. Both those casts had incredible chemistry, and with the exception of Richard Dean Anderson, were mostly unknown actors-- and let's admit that when SG-1 started, Richard Dean Anderson was risking has-been status.
But let's give credit where credit is due-- Battlestar Galactica. Even leaving out the rediscovery of Olmos and Mcdonnel (not to mention their unique chemistry together), consider a few names: Jamie Bamber. Tricia Helfer. Katee Sackoff. James Callis. There's a whole list of actors that BSG discovered and set on the path to promising careers.
Also, Warehouse 13 has a pretty awesome cast, and they've had chemistry from day one. The quirky chemistry of the cast is what makes the show work, as it makes the quirky nature of it's writing believable, of an entire world dominated by mad scientists and flukes of nature somehow gone wrong.
In just a few episodes, I've also been impressed by the casting of SGU. And the writing is fresh, even if the show is basically Stargate: Voyager. My main concerns about the show have more to do with wondering if the writers will give their better cast characters with enough depth to fill and round out.
Even SyFy's other shows that I don't like show amazing casting with incredible chemistry. They just have problems with plot and writing. The reason Eureka lost interest with me was that I hated it's premise, but I'll be the first to admit that it's cast has great charisma and carries the show much further than it's writing deserves. I was hooked on SG Atlantis until the writing got a bit too drawn out. From what I've seen of Sanctuary, the cast is again spectacular, but the writing is just too hooked on the 'we fight bad guys' trope. It feels like it wants to be Buffy with bigger guns.
Which brings us to Sci-Fi's problem with writing, in which case I think an American Being Human is actually well-suited to the network.
Let's admit it: SyFy's writing problem is budget.
They had to cancel the amazingly well-written Farscape because they couldn't afford the production budget of the show's costuming, set pieces, etc., and a universe that wasn't as exotically alien just wouldn't have been Farscape.
That's why SG-1 fared better; less freaky aliens, and military surplus is cheap to buy for costuming. SG-1's eventual writing problem was a reluctance to pull the plug on what was obviously the network's flagship show in favor of the untested SG-Atlantis or the more expensive BSG.
BSG fared better because it didn't require many new sets, and those that it did were cheap to replicate. It's budget problem was paying for it's amazing cast, and they finagled their way into that by strategic DVD sales and cutting the seasons in half.
SG-Universe has worked so far because so far there's only really one set that counts that isn't modern day America (aka Vancouver).
Warehouse 13 works because it's major set piece is both cheap to replicate, and most of the show takes place in modern day America (Vancouver), and it's major technical needs are a few cool looking props.
Eureka blows because it eventually settled into 'super-science breakdown of the week.' Tied to it's set and more importantly it's in-character location, it's too repetitive. Sanctuary doesn't have Eureka's location problem, but suffers from the monster of the week bit. SG-Atlantis was great until they had to start re-cycling bad-guys to live within their budget.
Being Human simply doesn't have these budget hurdles. Extreme costuming is limited. The setting would be modern day America (read: likely Vancouver again). It's a drama, so there doesn't have to be as much budget for complex action scenes or monsters of the week. There is no escalation to apocalypse, as in Buffy/Angel, that requires an ever escalating cast of bad guys to fight. In other words, it presents no major budget hurdles to feedback into the writing and moderate it towards lame.
As for 'not being British enough,' meh. Some people have a fetish for anything British, but really.. meh. British comedy isn't really all that special. I don't like either version of the Office.
And I'd question whether SyFy isn't going to be edgy enough. I mean really, they're looking to compete with shows like Mad Men, to capture some of the audience of True Blood. They got pretty edgy in BSG (seriously, how many times did we see near naked Jamie Bamber, or Katee Sackoff, or Tricia Helfer, or... list goes on. The BSG crew screwed like rabbits, in retrospect.) #beinghuman
@Jason Hubbard: If they can remake Being Human that has a cast with even half the chemistry that Warehouse 13 has, I'll be happy. Even in Sy-Fy's short lived shows like The Invisible Man and The Dresden Files, those casts just oozed chemistry. And Being Human is very much a character based program. You just made me look forward to watching this. #beinghuman
@mekki: They do find a lot of under-rated, charming actors. Shoot it in the bad part of town in Vancouver and there ya go. 3 unknowns (who therefore won't cost much), random guest stars (ditto)... as long as it's well-written, it could work.
But I fear they'll focus-group it to death. #beinghuman
11/04/09
I wonder if some scientist would be interested enough, and not put off by the paranormal babble to put some sensors in the place, and see if there's anything unusual in the place, or if it's just a pyromaniac's hoax. #ghosts
11/04/09
11/04/09
Anyhow, he has better things to do, like pick up the pieces of his failed gubernatorial campaign. #ghosts
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/05/09
10/30/09
I hate the majority of US televison shows. The actors and actresses with few exceptions are pretty and vapid. They just cannot act. Too many female characters are portrayed as fashion-obsessed airheads. The males are portrayed as douchebags.
The actors and actresses in the UK look more like real people. "Spaced" was the first televison show I could actually relate to as a female geek. I am Black and there are no Black geek characters on US televison except that horrible Urkle character from "Family Matters". "The IT Crowd" is a UK show has a Black geek character named Marcus Moss.
I hate shows like "Desperate Housewives" , "Girlfriends", and "Gossip Girl". "Ugly Betty" is the only US show I actually bother to watch.
I read they are planning to remake "Shameless" which is one of my other favorite UK shows. The very "Britishness" is what makes shows like "Being Human" and "Shameless" unique. Americans know so little about other cultures. We have to "Americanize" everything. This madness has to end! #beinghuman
10/29/09
10/29/09
Siffy, not so much... #beinghuman
10/29/09
10/29/09
like i have been saying many times we need new scifi not remakes #beinghuman
10/29/09
How about, if something is good, you release it in the states? Doctor Who has found a gigantic following here, so much so that BBC America has started airing things concurrently. So why can't SyFy just buy Being Human's syndication rights and air it here instead of trying to make it over again?
I feel the same way about the Americanized version of Top Gear that keeps faltering here in the states. Top Gear can't be brought over because there can be no imitation of it. It's those three hosts and that format specifically that makes the how what it is.
I haven't seen Being Human yet, but I imagine it's the same way. British networks air American shows instead of making their own versions, don't they? Aside from game shows I mean. I'm sure that they loved Stargate and Babylon 5 just as much even though it wasn't made on their shores. Can't we return the favor?
10/29/09
The pilot/prototype eppisode thing was a lot more fun, imho.
Its certainly no "Jeykll" #beinghuman
10/29/09
10/29/09
10/29/09
First: if there's one thing SyFy can actually do in it's scripted shows, it's finding actors with some sort of unique charisma and fitting them together with unique chemistry.
Say what you want about the network's shows, but the casts have all had chemistry. We'll start with SG-1, which granted, wasn't originally pulled together by Sci-Fi, and ditto with Farscape, which was technically put together by Jim Henson studios. Both those casts had incredible chemistry, and with the exception of Richard Dean Anderson, were mostly unknown actors-- and let's admit that when SG-1 started, Richard Dean Anderson was risking has-been status.
But let's give credit where credit is due-- Battlestar Galactica. Even leaving out the rediscovery of Olmos and Mcdonnel (not to mention their unique chemistry together), consider a few names: Jamie Bamber. Tricia Helfer. Katee Sackoff. James Callis. There's a whole list of actors that BSG discovered and set on the path to promising careers.
Also, Warehouse 13 has a pretty awesome cast, and they've had chemistry from day one. The quirky chemistry of the cast is what makes the show work, as it makes the quirky nature of it's writing believable, of an entire world dominated by mad scientists and flukes of nature somehow gone wrong.
In just a few episodes, I've also been impressed by the casting of SGU. And the writing is fresh, even if the show is basically Stargate: Voyager. My main concerns about the show have more to do with wondering if the writers will give their better cast characters with enough depth to fill and round out.
Even SyFy's other shows that I don't like show amazing casting with incredible chemistry. They just have problems with plot and writing. The reason Eureka lost interest with me was that I hated it's premise, but I'll be the first to admit that it's cast has great charisma and carries the show much further than it's writing deserves. I was hooked on SG Atlantis until the writing got a bit too drawn out. From what I've seen of Sanctuary, the cast is again spectacular, but the writing is just too hooked on the 'we fight bad guys' trope. It feels like it wants to be Buffy with bigger guns.
Which brings us to Sci-Fi's problem with writing, in which case I think an American Being Human is actually well-suited to the network.
Let's admit it: SyFy's writing problem is budget.
They had to cancel the amazingly well-written Farscape because they couldn't afford the production budget of the show's costuming, set pieces, etc., and a universe that wasn't as exotically alien just wouldn't have been Farscape.
That's why SG-1 fared better; less freaky aliens, and military surplus is cheap to buy for costuming. SG-1's eventual writing problem was a reluctance to pull the plug on what was obviously the network's flagship show in favor of the untested SG-Atlantis or the more expensive BSG.
BSG fared better because it didn't require many new sets, and those that it did were cheap to replicate. It's budget problem was paying for it's amazing cast, and they finagled their way into that by strategic DVD sales and cutting the seasons in half.
SG-Universe has worked so far because so far there's only really one set that counts that isn't modern day America (aka Vancouver).
Warehouse 13 works because it's major set piece is both cheap to replicate, and most of the show takes place in modern day America (Vancouver), and it's major technical needs are a few cool looking props.
Eureka blows because it eventually settled into 'super-science breakdown of the week.' Tied to it's set and more importantly it's in-character location, it's too repetitive. Sanctuary doesn't have Eureka's location problem, but suffers from the monster of the week bit. SG-Atlantis was great until they had to start re-cycling bad-guys to live within their budget.
Being Human simply doesn't have these budget hurdles. Extreme costuming is limited. The setting would be modern day America (read: likely Vancouver again). It's a drama, so there doesn't have to be as much budget for complex action scenes or monsters of the week. There is no escalation to apocalypse, as in Buffy/Angel, that requires an ever escalating cast of bad guys to fight. In other words, it presents no major budget hurdles to feedback into the writing and moderate it towards lame.
As for 'not being British enough,' meh. Some people have a fetish for anything British, but really.. meh. British comedy isn't really all that special. I don't like either version of the Office.
And I'd question whether SyFy isn't going to be edgy enough. I mean really, they're looking to compete with shows like Mad Men, to capture some of the audience of True Blood. They got pretty edgy in BSG (seriously, how many times did we see near naked Jamie Bamber, or Katee Sackoff, or Tricia Helfer, or... list goes on. The BSG crew screwed like rabbits, in retrospect.) #beinghuman
10/29/09
10/29/09
But I fear they'll focus-group it to death. #beinghuman