If we were going to mention Chung Kuo's City Europe, then I think it would have been good for completeness's sake to mentioned that in Wingrove's world there was at least one contintent-dominating city for each major land mass on Earth (one each for each continent, where as Asia had two – City East Asia and City West Asia).
The cities in Wingrove's Chung Kuo didn't cover 100 per cent of the available land area, just the more level; in City Europe, only the Alps and the Carpathians were not built over, and were left open as wilderness.
Moreover, on Wingrove's 23rd Century Earth, vast areas of continent were left open to grow food to feed the 36 Billions that the sealed Cities held.
All that being said, there's one important megaconurbation that was left out – the Hooterville/Pixley megacity, popularized by the shared universe of Green Acres/Petticoat Junction stories. Oh, it was kind of an inverted megacity – instead of being filled with humanity, it was filled with farms populated by surrealistic hayseed farmers - but it was a single, vaguely-defined entity. I think it deserved to be mentioned.
Great fun. I always figured The City in TransMet was San Francisco/all of the west coast. Guess I need to read more of it.
The problem with the old concept of mega-cities is that the future doesn't appear to be going to plan. Sure, Moscow is constantly growing, and perhaps Chinese and Indian cities, but they're just becoming supermassive sprawling versions of themselves. And in the West you don't get cities joining themselves. Los Angeles is the best example of what American urban areas will become: megalopolises. There is no city center, just a massive conurbation of many different cities and their centers which people commute to and from throughout. Even if it did get big enough with good enough rail travel to include Santa Barbara or San Diego, each of those individual cities in between will maintain their individuality, but will work together with other municipalities to make the entire area more enjoyable.
Less insanely fun, but more realistic, and arguably more personable.
These are all funny to me for not acknowledging megacity New York; Boston to Atlanta indeed; yeah, those are the landmarks of note. Sure. Newsflash BosWash; you are already a real city; we call you New York.
@mordicai: Don't forget Phoenix. The city and it's surrounding towns merged into one massive sprawling megopolis. Same as LA, Vancouver, BC and Toronto, Ontario.
For the development of mega cities IRL, I recommend Mike Davis' book 'Planet of Slums'. He writes about a number of growing mega cities around the world being swelled by huge numbers of underemployed poor immigrants creating huge favelas/banlieus/townships/whatever you want to call them. The book does mention the growing coastal mega city of urbanising China, as well as a West African mega city centring on Lagos.
Mike Davis generally is one of the best writers tackling these kinds of issues in non fiction, and deserves the attention of folk writing the posts for the Future Metro theme. [en.wikipedia.org])
As for the merger of Edinburgh and Glasgow-the whole reason that there was all the fuss made about how Edinburgh and Glasgow should co-operate is because they don't. There's a long history of rivalry if not straight up hatred between the two.
The reasons for this are complex but imo go back to the fact that Glasgow was the centre of heavy industry and perceived itself as more working class, and masculine, than Edinburgh, the centre of law, finance and, since the Scottish Parliament was established (and now with a Nationalist government the prospect of maybe full statehood) politics and government.
I doubt that this rivalry will be overcome any time soon, as it has pretty deep pyscho-social roots, which paradoxically are perhaps worsened by the end of heavy industry in Glasgow, since Glasgow has lost a lot of its identity and feels in some ways emasculated and defensive.
However, Scotland as a whole is dominated by Edinburgh, Glasgow and their surrounding sattelites, referred to as 'The Central Belt,' and much hated by people from more rural areas like the Highlands.
Incidentally, I'm an inhabitant of Maryhill, a place that was once its own town and has since been swallowed up by Greater Glasgow. [en.wikipedia.org]
Hey Charlie, just to clarify for everybody, City Europe in Chung Kuo was one of 7 such cities, effectively making "City Earth" another Holy Terra, but with oceans and a functional ecosystem.
@RexMaximus: It's been awhile since I read this series, but I thought pretty much the entire landmass of Earth was one big city? Regardless, I'm glad someone even remembered hese books.
@namanintx: I got to the seventh book last fall (the 8th is impossible to find), and I recall that the cities covered all the continents except Antarctica, except where the environments were too inhospitable or impractical (deserts, mountains), or where it made mandatory farmland (Eastern Europe).
Asia was special enough to get two cities.
@RexMaximus: I loved this series as well. I wish it was still in print. I never knew there was a book 8. There were some open areas for growing food, but this was one of the coolest mega cities in anything I've read.
I live in an area where two counties are divided by a bay, and while ours is the more populous side of the bay (with the major city) both counties have for a long time been considered part of the same geographical "zone." Now that the other side of the bay is becoming more wealthy at a rate radical to our side, they've begun the process of distancing themselves culturally from us and trying to extricate themselves from this bi-county setup. Which in actual life experience is a very boring situation, but on paper, as above, has the makings of a greater mega-city civil war novel. I'm on it.
Charlie Jane, I believe you've somewhat misinterpreted A Canticle for Liebowitz.
Texarkana is not a mega-city, but rather the eponymous capital of a city-state in the neo-medieval period after the Flame Deluge which then evolves into the dominant power in the Western Hemisphere. At the end of the book, when humanity has come back to and surpassed 20th Century-level tech, the nation of Texarkana destroys their rival, a pan-Asian nation which I cannot remember the name of.
Also, when I saw "The City" I was super-excited because I thought The Masters of Solitude and Wintermind were getting some love. Alas, no. :(
@cletar: This is only what's in the SF literature. I can't think of any specifically mentioned off the top of my head, and, given that there are at least Japanese mega-cities mentioned, it looks like CJA couldn't find any either.
Well your right about CJA's intentions, but not about what CJA has actually presented...
CJA mentions EdinGow and Gauteng and specifically states that no SciFi has been written about them.... but deems their future 'rail links' make them worthy enough to mention...
Given that I live in Shanghai, a city with a population of 25 million and growing rapidly, currently the only city in the world with a Maglev, and with concrete plans to develop it and its high speed bullet train network, given these and other factors too numerous to mention, I also find the omission of China and India unusual...
Science Fictions role of predicting future developments, through creativity and imagination based upon the present day reality of the author, will surely result in both of these countries featuring heavily in new upcoming works! (though maybe not from Chinese Authors - the Gov here prefers to encourage its authors to fantastically retell its glorious history than concern the hard-working citizens with potential dystopic futures)
-apologies for spelling or grammar errors, written in haste before rushing to class-
@Deftly: I couldn't even find any non-SF references for Chinese mega-cities. Shanghai is a huge city, and no doubt it'll get huger. But I couldn't find any sources claiming that, say, Shanghai and Wuxi were going to merge into one conurbation. That's the kind of thing I spent literally hours googling for. And I admit I haven't read Chung Kuo, but the sources I found on it only mentioned City Europe.
@Charlie Jane Anders: Given time and the rate of urban conurbation development here, Shanghai will merge with other cities into ever larger conurbations... however the governance of those conurbations is another matter... In China there are only 4 metropolitan areas, Shanghai, Beijing, Guangzhou, and Chongqing...
Chongqing is the interesting example here, it is in fact the largest city in China, by population, exceeding Shanghai by some 5-6 million according to some figures (always complicated by migrant workers and unregistered people)... however it was also the last of the great metropolitan areas to be classified as such, prior to this it was actually 7 different cities... thus becoming a 'megacity'
Just because you can't find talk of the merging of governance between urban centres whose conurbations merge doesnt mean in future it wont... and one of the examples I have quoted of yours is that of EdinGow, I'm from the North East of England and I've heard very little of this maglev, and less still of merger of governance of these two cities, even if they did merge conurbations... (though I am aware of and have been privy to proposals for a UK long Maglev)
I am from Newcastle Upon Tyne, and our conurbation has merged with the neighbouring (arch enemy) city of Sunderland, such that we share the same urban transportation system (metro)...
Shanghai's Maglev system is proposed to extend to neighbouring Hangzhou, it has already built the worlds longest and 2nd longest sea bridges acrosss the Hangzhou bay, and to Nearby Ningbo. The city has expanded eastward to the sea occupying all available land, and is spreading south now towards Hangzhou... At the same time it is spreading towards its northwesterly neighbour Suzhou... this spread is relentless and will be accompanied by rapid transport systems allowing for 'effective' communication between all disparate parts
Having said all of this we are talking about two things, the spread and merging of urban conurbations, but also the merging of their government to truly create a megacity... and you are quite correct that there is no signal of this between Shanghai and its territories...
Dominance is another matter
ps To Clarify my position succinctly, a Megacity to me is a huge sprawling city, Shanghai is already that, with few peers anywhere (Tokyo, Sao Paulo....) - any reference to Shanghai is a reference to a Megacity, what else do you call a city that contains half the population of England, one tenth the entire continental United States, and covers 6500 square kilometres and (rapidly) growing - I love my SciFi, but I live here and the lines between reality and fiction are beginning to blur...
There's the Dallas-Ft. Worth Metropolitan Area, which already exists and encompasses pretty much everything between the two cities and is affectionately known as the MetroMess.
Chi-Pitt? Good god, what a concept. Do you pronounce it as Kai-Pit, or Chip-it?
@Evil Tortie's Mom: R.O.A.C.H.: I've never heard that term before today, despite having lived in the "in-between" area (Northeast Ohio) -- though I was but a wee child then and wasn't given to discussing urban development. We were connected to Pittsburgh, but no more than we were connected to Cleveland. Chicago was rarely mentioned. I imagine that the Great Lakes greatly facilitate regional cohesiveness. Even so, calling it a "Mega-City" is something of a stretch. Calling it an economic region consisting of several large metropolitan areas such as Chicago and Cleve-burg would probably be more accurate, for those of you seeking to write the next great Rust-punk epic.
Lovingly, diligently collected data from all over the SF cannon. Wonderfully intricate and detailed graphics by Stephanie. How did this not get tagged as "Chart Porn"?!
Also, I was sort of already under the impression that Joburg and Pretoria were the same city, except Pretoria was where the white people lived. But... my impression of the area came from the HIGHLY questionable source of my Afrikaaner host family...
09/21/09
The cities in Wingrove's Chung Kuo didn't cover 100 per cent of the available land area, just the more level; in City Europe, only the Alps and the Carpathians were not built over, and were left open as wilderness.
Moreover, on Wingrove's 23rd Century Earth, vast areas of continent were left open to grow food to feed the 36 Billions that the sealed Cities held.
All that being said, there's one important megaconurbation that was left out – the Hooterville/Pixley megacity, popularized by the shared universe of Green Acres/Petticoat Junction stories. Oh, it was kind of an inverted megacity – instead of being filled with humanity, it was filled with farms populated by surrealistic hayseed farmers - but it was a single, vaguely-defined entity. I think it deserved to be mentioned.
09/19/09
The problem with the old concept of mega-cities is that the future doesn't appear to be going to plan. Sure, Moscow is constantly growing, and perhaps Chinese and Indian cities, but they're just becoming supermassive sprawling versions of themselves. And in the West you don't get cities joining themselves. Los Angeles is the best example of what American urban areas will become: megalopolises. There is no city center, just a massive conurbation of many different cities and their centers which people commute to and from throughout. Even if it did get big enough with good enough rail travel to include Santa Barbara or San Diego, each of those individual cities in between will maintain their individuality, but will work together with other municipalities to make the entire area more enjoyable.
Less insanely fun, but more realistic, and arguably more personable.
09/19/09
09/19/09
09/19/09
09/19/09
Mike Davis generally is one of the best writers tackling these kinds of issues in non fiction, and deserves the attention of folk writing the posts for the Future Metro theme. [en.wikipedia.org])
As for the merger of Edinburgh and Glasgow-the whole reason that there was all the fuss made about how Edinburgh and Glasgow should co-operate is because they don't. There's a long history of rivalry if not straight up hatred between the two.
The reasons for this are complex but imo go back to the fact that Glasgow was the centre of heavy industry and perceived itself as more working class, and masculine, than Edinburgh, the centre of law, finance and, since the Scottish Parliament was established (and now with a Nationalist government the prospect of maybe full statehood) politics and government.
I doubt that this rivalry will be overcome any time soon, as it has pretty deep pyscho-social roots, which paradoxically are perhaps worsened by the end of heavy industry in Glasgow, since Glasgow has lost a lot of its identity and feels in some ways emasculated and defensive.
However, Scotland as a whole is dominated by Edinburgh, Glasgow and their surrounding sattelites, referred to as 'The Central Belt,' and much hated by people from more rural areas like the Highlands.
Incidentally, I'm an inhabitant of Maryhill, a place that was once its own town and has since been swallowed up by Greater Glasgow. [en.wikipedia.org]
09/19/09
(Dystopian Sydney ahoy!)
09/18/09
09/19/09
09/19/09
Asia was special enough to get two cities.
09/20/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
Texarkana is not a mega-city, but rather the eponymous capital of a city-state in the neo-medieval period after the Flame Deluge which then evolves into the dominant power in the Western Hemisphere. At the end of the book, when humanity has come back to and surpassed 20th Century-level tech, the nation of Texarkana destroys their rival, a pan-Asian nation which I cannot remember the name of.
Also, when I saw "The City" I was super-excited because I thought The Masters of Solitude and Wintermind were getting some love. Alas, no. :(
09/18/09
09/19/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
Well your right about CJA's intentions, but not about what CJA has actually presented...
CJA mentions EdinGow and Gauteng and specifically states that no SciFi has been written about them.... but deems their future 'rail links' make them worthy enough to mention...
Given that I live in Shanghai, a city with a population of 25 million and growing rapidly, currently the only city in the world with a Maglev, and with concrete plans to develop it and its high speed bullet train network, given these and other factors too numerous to mention, I also find the omission of China and India unusual...
Science Fictions role of predicting future developments, through creativity and imagination based upon the present day reality of the author, will surely result in both of these countries featuring heavily in new upcoming works! (though maybe not from Chinese Authors - the Gov here prefers to encourage its authors to fantastically retell its glorious history than concern the hard-working citizens with potential dystopic futures)
-apologies for spelling or grammar errors, written in haste before rushing to class-
09/18/09
09/19/09
Chongqing is the interesting example here, it is in fact the largest city in China, by population, exceeding Shanghai by some 5-6 million according to some figures (always complicated by migrant workers and unregistered people)... however it was also the last of the great metropolitan areas to be classified as such, prior to this it was actually 7 different cities... thus becoming a 'megacity'
Just because you can't find talk of the merging of governance between urban centres whose conurbations merge doesnt mean in future it wont... and one of the examples I have quoted of yours is that of EdinGow, I'm from the North East of England and I've heard very little of this maglev, and less still of merger of governance of these two cities, even if they did merge conurbations... (though I am aware of and have been privy to proposals for a UK long Maglev)
I am from Newcastle Upon Tyne, and our conurbation has merged with the neighbouring (arch enemy) city of Sunderland, such that we share the same urban transportation system (metro)...
Shanghai's Maglev system is proposed to extend to neighbouring Hangzhou, it has already built the worlds longest and 2nd longest sea bridges acrosss the Hangzhou bay, and to Nearby Ningbo. The city has expanded eastward to the sea occupying all available land, and is spreading south now towards Hangzhou... At the same time it is spreading towards its northwesterly neighbour Suzhou... this spread is relentless and will be accompanied by rapid transport systems allowing for 'effective' communication between all disparate parts
Having said all of this we are talking about two things, the spread and merging of urban conurbations, but also the merging of their government to truly create a megacity... and you are quite correct that there is no signal of this between Shanghai and its territories...
Dominance is another matter
ps To Clarify my position succinctly, a Megacity to me is a huge sprawling city, Shanghai is already that, with few peers anywhere (Tokyo, Sao Paulo....) - any reference to Shanghai is a reference to a Megacity, what else do you call a city that contains half the population of England, one tenth the entire continental United States, and covers 6500 square kilometres and (rapidly) growing - I love my SciFi, but I live here and the lines between reality and fiction are beginning to blur...
09/18/09
Chi-Pitt? Good god, what a concept. Do you pronounce it as Kai-Pit, or Chip-it?
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/19/09
09/19/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
First thought: Where's the India of Ian McDonald's River of Gods?
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
Also: originally read Brit-Cit as Brit-Clit.
Finally: Nice map Stephanie!
09/18/09