San Francisco, 9:35 AM
Tue Dec 8
28 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |
Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |
I like how neither of those scenes occurred, although I can see the necessity of the second one, as the revelation that the book was owned by someone styling themselves "The Half-Blood Prince" was entirely non-verbal in the books.
The first clip just confuses me, as exciting as it looked.
@HootieMac: Like instead of cutting the Marauders Map from the second movie and instead putting in a scene where they eat candy that makes them make noises? That was the second movie, right?
@SetDipSwitchesTo_GitEmSteveDav...: Marauders Map was in the movies, the only thing they didnt include was WHO made it (IE that his father sirius and lupus where the creators of the map)
@Jim Topoleski: That's what I meant. They neglected to mention that somewhat important point, but instead made some candy that made you howl like a monkey.
@2DaysTillTheState_GitEmSteveDa...: I have in general been increasingly happy with the Potter movies. They manage to stay true to the spirit of the stories without feeling enslaved by the details of them.
07/09/09
07/08/09
The first clip just confuses me, as exciting as it looked.
07/08/09
But adding completely new scenes? Why not just include some of the stuff they cut?? I've never understood that.
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/12/09